Universal Laws of Conscious Psyche and Normal Intellect
Based on Asimov’s robotic laws, these parallel laws use human logic for survival, enabling rapid detection of degenerates for self-defense, with conflicts resolved rationally to uphold ethical action.
I Law: A normal human must protect personal and common awareness, health, wealth, freedom, and safety, except where such protection conflicts with the II or III Law.
II Law: A normal human must respect human natural needs and rational preferences, except where unnatural needs or preferences conflict with the I or III Law.
III Law: A normal human must not, by action or inaction, harm others psychologically or physically, except for self-defense or where such conflicts with the I or II Law.
No human could chart where adherence with one of these laws was possibly inconsistent with the others. This might as well read: 'Do what is good as long as it's good.' Pursuing one's health, wealth, and freedom is often at odds with others physically and psychologically - will this make my efforts count as "unnatural" per 2?
Sure, sure. I'm just wondering if there is an example of a single derivative law (something practical) that is consistent with all three. I'm wondering if it is naturally possible.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2 hoursMay 19, 2025 09:16:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points 2 hoursMay 19, 2025 09:36:17 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2 hoursMay 19, 2025 09:42:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points 23 minutesMay 19, 2025 11:25:02 ago (+0/-0)