[sic] 111K catalogued child abuse cases in a 30-day period; 55%-85% of these degenerates sharing CP have raped over 13 children victims under the age of 12 in their life.
We need a top-down purge. It should be legal to torture-murder paedophiles.
Something is fishy. "Every red dot ..." Over half the USA was colored red. And how did the only seven members of C3 (whatever that is) collect this IP data? And why don't they target the obviously known sharing sites? It just doesn't make logic sense to me, and I refuse to believe that being a pedo is some kind of norm. This seems like fear-mongering, psy-op material.
Dude it's a printed off visualization using probably govt owned software. Do you think there's less of this shit out there than on the map? Wtf is this take even?
Shit, dude, with the way computers are designed these days, I wouldn’t be surprised if anyone can have their computer used as a proxy for such activities. Glow niggers can likely plant the shit on your computer.
I like to think NAT is safe. But I’m not a security expert.
I'm a free speech guy. I don't care either way. But there are multiple things regarding "child porn" ban that show it has nothing to do with the fucking children involved in the creation.
Both the idea that AI generated child porn should be banned also, and the idea that death films shouldn't be banned point this out clear as day.
So basically. No one actually fucking cares about the kids actually used in it. They just wanna make sure other's aren't getting off to kids in any way shape or form. Oh and they wanna make the distribution and possession of intelligence agencies and elite's favorite diddle activity evidence is illegal to possess by the plebs.
No one actually fucking cares about the kids actually used in it.
No idea where you got that from, but that's a retarded take. Like so retarded I have no idea where you could've even come up with it. Of course don't want kids raped because we don't want to have their lives destroyed, which is what it does. CONSOOMING videos of raped children, fake and gay or not, is not "muh frees peach" issue. The Founders didn't write 1A with kiddy gooners in mind.
They just wanna make sure other's aren't getting off to kids in any way shape or form
Yea we'd like that too. I'm Aristotelian on this, as we all should be. When you indulge vice, you get more vice. When you indulge virtue, you get more virtue. Porn may not lead everyone to become sexual deviants, but some 100/100 trannies out there will tell you that porn got the ball rolling. Similarly, there might be some child gooners out there that can stick to AI child porn, but the vast amounts of pedos will goon over it until they need something more substantial, i.e. "the real thing" i.e. the kids that you incorrectly think "no one fucking cares about."
Let me guess: you're one of those "legalize all drugs" types too, right? That's worked out so well for Portland and other shitholes that refuse to prosecute drug crimes.
Deter the vice, and it will lead to more people seeking virtue. Just because some people will not be persuaded by the deterrent is no excuse for removing the deterrent, though it may be justification for increasing the efficacy of the deterrent.
Oh and they wanna make the distribution and possession of intelligence agencies and elite's favorite diddle activity evidence is illegal to possess by the plebs
Yea something tells me the child coomers aren't downloading vast quantities of porn and sifting through it in hopes of building a case against some powerful political actor.
I absolutely agree if it's based on real kids or hyper realistic, but if it includes stuff like the japs lolis I'm more wary. The slippery slope has been proven real and this would 100% be used to fuck us over.
Goddammit man we are unquestionably cooked. We all agree child porn in any form is perverse and wrong and consequently should be illegal and dealt with harshly and your response is "But what about my loli anime/manga!?!?"
Shut the fuck up weeb. If your cartoon kiddy porn is so important to you that you would forgo protecting real children from sex crimes, then there's no hope for you. Fuck it, you go to prison too.
While the people generating it are pervs, the question comes down to harm.
I can probably suggest that normalization of sexualizing children is harmful, but that exists in many legal forms in Hollywood, beauty pageants, etc.
There is nuance to the debate.
Should people who harm children be harshly sentenced? Yes.
The crux of the issue, though, is that politically protected pedophiles are also engaged in other crimes. This is why exposing elite pedophiles and executing them is so important to society. It solves a wide breadth of other problems.
The people in the intelligence agencies involved are similarly culpable. Execute them. Stop providing child porn the masses.
One pervert in his basement making photoshops is not the same as FBI agents running honeypots with millions of dollars of infrastructure behind them and the blessing of the government.
The Feds are the problem. The blackmail schemes and trafficking networks they curate are the problem.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 9 points 7 hoursMay 13, 2025 07:28:27 ago (+9/-0)
[sic] 111K catalogued child abuse cases in a 30-day period; 55%-85% of these degenerates sharing CP have raped over 13 children victims under the age of 12 in their life.
We need a top-down purge. It should be legal to torture-murder paedophiles.
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 7 points 7 hoursMay 13, 2025 07:52:01 ago (+7/-0)
It is. Just dont get caught.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 2 points 5 hoursMay 13, 2025 09:26:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 6 points 6 hoursMay 13, 2025 08:35:39 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 4 points 6 hoursMay 13, 2025 09:02:32 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 2 hoursMay 13, 2025 12:33:48 ago (+0/-0)
This has been an issue since the internet mass adoption in the Dialup days. Before then peados met via CB/HAM Radio.
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront 0 points 2 hoursMay 13, 2025 12:53:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 3 points 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 10:36:52 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 1 point 20 minutesMay 13, 2025 14:55:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 17 minutesMay 13, 2025 14:59:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Trope
[ - ] Trope 0 points 7 minutesMay 13, 2025 15:09:04 ago (+0/-0)
I like to think NAT is safe. But I’m not a security expert.
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 0 points 1 hourMay 13, 2025 14:01:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront 0 points 2 hoursMay 13, 2025 12:53:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 2 hoursMay 13, 2025 12:31:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 7 hoursMay 13, 2025 07:45:08 ago (+1/-1)
Should ai generated child porn be banned or not?
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 5 points 6 hoursMay 13, 2025 08:34:27 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 11:14:03 ago (+1/-1)
Both the idea that AI generated child porn should be banned also, and the idea that death films shouldn't be banned point this out clear as day.
So basically. No one actually fucking cares about the kids actually used in it. They just wanna make sure other's aren't getting off to kids in any way shape or form. Oh and they wanna make the distribution and possession of intelligence agencies and elite's favorite diddle activity evidence is illegal to possess by the plebs.
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 3 hoursMay 13, 2025 11:38:44 ago (+1/-0)
No idea where you got that from, but that's a retarded take. Like so retarded I have no idea where you could've even come up with it. Of course don't want kids raped because we don't want to have their lives destroyed, which is what it does. CONSOOMING videos of raped children, fake and gay or not, is not "muh frees peach" issue. The Founders didn't write 1A with kiddy gooners in mind.
Yea we'd like that too. I'm Aristotelian on this, as we all should be. When you indulge vice, you get more vice. When you indulge virtue, you get more virtue. Porn may not lead everyone to become sexual deviants, but some 100/100 trannies out there will tell you that porn got the ball rolling. Similarly, there might be some child gooners out there that can stick to AI child porn, but the vast amounts of pedos will goon over it until they need something more substantial, i.e. "the real thing" i.e. the kids that you incorrectly think "no one fucking cares about."
Let me guess: you're one of those "legalize all drugs" types too, right? That's worked out so well for Portland and other shitholes that refuse to prosecute drug crimes.
Deter the vice, and it will lead to more people seeking virtue. Just because some people will not be persuaded by the deterrent is no excuse for removing the deterrent, though it may be justification for increasing the efficacy of the deterrent.
Yea something tells me the child coomers aren't downloading vast quantities of porn and sifting through it in hopes of building a case against some powerful political actor.
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 21 minutesMay 13, 2025 14:54:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 12 minutesMay 13, 2025 15:03:31 ago (+0/-0)
Would you label that snuff or murder? How about those girls that got beheaded?
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 -3 points 5 hoursMay 13, 2025 09:26:00 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 4 points 5 hoursMay 13, 2025 09:32:12 ago (+5/-1)
Shut the fuck up weeb. If your cartoon kiddy porn is so important to you that you would forgo protecting real children from sex crimes, then there's no hope for you. Fuck it, you go to prison too.
[ + ] MeyerLansky
[ - ] MeyerLansky 1 point 3 hoursMay 13, 2025 11:48:52 ago (+1/-0)
While the people generating it are pervs, the question comes down to harm.
I can probably suggest that normalization of sexualizing children is harmful, but that exists in many legal forms in Hollywood, beauty pageants, etc.
There is nuance to the debate.
Should people who harm children be harshly sentenced? Yes.
The crux of the issue, though, is that politically protected pedophiles are also engaged in other crimes. This is why exposing elite pedophiles and executing them is so important to society. It solves a wide breadth of other problems.
The people in the intelligence agencies involved are similarly culpable. Execute them. Stop providing child porn the masses.
One pervert in his basement making photoshops is not the same as FBI agents running honeypots with millions of dollars of infrastructure behind them and the blessing of the government.
The Feds are the problem. The blackmail schemes and trafficking networks they curate are the problem.