They talk about a declining population as being overtaxed to care for the elderly. Source?? All about healthcare - the ponzi scheme of nationalized health. Solution: stop funding the elderly when the burden becomes too high.
Yes that is cold hearted, but no matter how the US goes, in 4 or 5 years there will be a budget crisis due to the exploding interest on the debt, and unless the government wants the fallout from a loan default, there will have to be cuts, and hopefully the cuts will be to the elderly programs.
The programs of most nations were designed around a lifespan of 70ish years, now everybody is living for 85 years, straining the system, and most of those people are suffering constantly. I am a big fan of quality of life over quantity of life.
Instead of having all this fear porn about needing lots of kids, who will have a definite low quality of life for their productive years, let's have a good discussion on national insurance programs.
If person x pays in $100k to some program, the max output should be a set number, say $200k, and when that limit is reached, say goodbye to payments.
The fact that old people or self-created health retards can take $400k of services per year is just insane. The biggest losers in these cases? All the young people.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2 daysMay 11, 2025 21:57:09 ago (+0/-0)
They talk about a declining population as being overtaxed to care for the elderly. Source?? All about healthcare - the ponzi scheme of nationalized health. Solution: stop funding the elderly when the burden becomes too high.
Yes that is cold hearted, but no matter how the US goes, in 4 or 5 years there will be a budget crisis due to the exploding interest on the debt, and unless the government wants the fallout from a loan default, there will have to be cuts, and hopefully the cuts will be to the elderly programs.
The programs of most nations were designed around a lifespan of 70ish years, now everybody is living for 85 years, straining the system, and most of those people are suffering constantly. I am a big fan of quality of life over quantity of life.
Instead of having all this fear porn about needing lots of kids, who will have a definite low quality of life for their productive years, let's have a good discussion on national insurance programs.
If person x pays in $100k to some program, the max output should be a set number, say $200k, and when that limit is reached, say goodbye to payments.
The fact that old people or self-created health retards can take $400k of services per year is just insane. The biggest losers in these cases? All the young people.
No wonder people aren't having kids.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2 daysMay 12, 2025 00:44:49 ago (+0/-0)