Japan is just fucked with or without abortions. In fiscal year 2023, approximately 126,700 induced abortions were reported in Japan. Not enough to matter in the long run.
What is the warning given to investors? "Past performance does not necessarily equate to future results"
Why do these kikes keep thinking that extinction is inevitable? Every woman can have 10 to 15 babies if the resources provide for them. Right now there are no resources available for good quality of life. Smarter to let the population decline.
Oh, but then the kike ponzi schemes of social welfare would crumble and take all that money away from the kikes.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 1 monthMay 5, 2025 10:01:54 ago (+1/-0)
True.
The only reason an article like this could be true, is if the populations are becoming infertile for various (((reasons))) and the kikes are broadcasting their knowledge and intentions before the truth comes out.
Funny you should ask. Wikipedia has a page on this: About 20,000 abortions take place in Israel every year, with the figure remaining steady, despite a substantial increase in the population.
Lol. Did they decide to swap the narrative up? Are we finally pushing the doomsday population crisis bullshit into the mainstream?
As little as a year ago, there was literally not one publication making any sort of claim even remotely close to what this article does. The general consensus was along the lines of "GDP will hit a dip, then everybody will be way better off than they were before", which both makes sense and is entirely in line with what we have seen happen again and again throughout history.
Now we have "pronatalists" and are facing an "extinction event". This is even more retarded than global warming, because those imbeciles can at least fall back on the uncertainty of conflicting data.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 1 monthMay 5, 2025 09:37:12 ago (+2/-0)
What is the warning given to investors? "Past performance does not necessarily equate to future results"
Why do these kikes keep thinking that extinction is inevitable? Every woman can have 10 to 15 babies if the resources provide for them. Right now there are no resources available for good quality of life. Smarter to let the population decline.
Oh, but then the kike ponzi schemes of social welfare would crumble and take all that money away from the kikes.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1 monthMay 5, 2025 09:54:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 1 monthMay 5, 2025 10:01:54 ago (+1/-0)
The only reason an article like this could be true, is if the populations are becoming infertile for various (((reasons))) and the kikes are broadcasting their knowledge and intentions before the truth comes out.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 1 monthMay 5, 2025 09:46:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic [op] 0 points 1 monthMay 5, 2025 15:01:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Jinglebanger
[ - ] Jinglebanger 0 points 1 monthMay 5, 2025 18:04:43 ago (+0/-0)
As little as a year ago, there was literally not one publication making any sort of claim even remotely close to what this article does. The general consensus was along the lines of "GDP will hit a dip, then everybody will be way better off than they were before", which both makes sense and is entirely in line with what we have seen happen again and again throughout history.
Now we have "pronatalists" and are facing an "extinction event". This is even more retarded than global warming, because those imbeciles can at least fall back on the uncertainty of conflicting data.
There's zero excuse for this level of ignorance.