A few years ago, a British company called Genus set out to design pigs immune to this germ using CRISPR gene editing.
This is the worst case scenario.
It's even worst than mRNA genetically raping the people who are injected with it. CRISPR gene editing goes on forever. As long as that genetic material is intact, it will keep dividing and passing on this edited genetic code for eternity.
This has the potential to "Vaccinate" anyone who consumes these animals, and then pass on the genetic "vaccination" to their off-spring.
But as more recent studies have been conducted, it has become apparent that the acquired spacer regions of CRISPR-Cas systems are indeed a form of Lamarckian evolution because they are genetic mutations that are acquired and then passed on.
I don’t agree. The natural genetic material in you and me does not divide forever, our cells hits the hayflick limit and stop dividing.
Eating pigs with editted genes will not alter our genes any more than eating normal pigs. When you eat a pig, you do not start encoding the gene sequences of pigs into your genome. You just break down pig meat and absorb its constituent nutrients. The same thing happens with the modified pig meat. It does not alter your DNA. But it might do bad or unexpected things to the pig gene pool. It might cause the disease in question to become more virulent. It will almost certainly incentivize factory farmers to keep pigs in more densely packed living environments. Soon we’ll have square pigs like in space truckers.
But as more recent studies have been conducted, it has become apparent that the acquired spacer regions of CRISPR-Cas systems are indeed a form of Lamarckian evolution because they are genetic mutations that are acquired and then passed on.
That does not mean what you think it means. It is talking about the pig population acquiring traits through non-natural mutation/selection process.
acquiring traits through non-natural mutation/selection process.
It is EXACTLY what I mean.
When you body ingests the CRISPR altered protein, it will be taking up the non-natural CRISPR gene segments and using them to build cells in your own body.
And before you claim that eating pork will not transfer unaltered cells into your system. I suggest you revisit just one of the many examples of what happens when humans consume improperly cooked pork. Recall that some parasites (unaltered ingested cells) actually cross the blood-brain barrier, and can even end up inside the human eye, liver, and etc.
I seriously doubt there has been adequate studies done on this exact topic.
No. Its clear you think the human population can “contract” modified genes from editted pigs. They can’t.
When you body ingests the CRISPR altered protein, it will be taking up the non-natural CRISPR gene segments and using them to build cells in your own body.
Wrong. There is nothing biologically unusual about these genes. They contain the same amino acids as DNA in an unmodified pig. And your body breaks down all the DNA into amino acids . Your body can’t tell the difference between the two versions of the gene . The DNA is denatured by your digestive tract.
And before you claim that eating pork will not transfer unaltered cells into your system. I suggest you revisit just one of the many examples of what happens when humans consume improperly cooked pork. Recall that some parasites (unaltered ingested cells) actually cross the blood-brain barrier, and can even end up inside the human eye, liver, and etc.
But parasites are alive. The pig is dead when you eat it. Its cells do not multiply. Its cells are dead. You are saying that dead pig cells have some prion like behavior, and thats not reasonable. If it happened with “CRISPR” pig cells, it would happen with normal pig cells too. CRISPR cells are not different in that way.
Ok. Allow me to prove you wrong with a even better example.
Proteins, from a Mother's breast milk, enter the babies blood stream and have TWO absolutely verified effects upon the infant cells.
- 1. The Mother's immune system transfers antibodies into the child's blood stream, VIA INGESTED BREAST MILK, which protects the infant for a matter of months. 100% proven.
- VIP 2. The Mother's INGESTED BREAST MILK transfers mRNA COVID-19 spike proteins into the infants blood stream and effectively vaccinates the infant. This also subjects the infant to all of the same potential side effects associated with direct mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. 100% proven.
As I said before... the mRNA can be transferred via the ingestion of proteins, and in fact do everything the direct vaccination does.
I invite you to dispute the above. I can provide the needed studies which prove my point.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 4 points 11 hoursMay 2, 2025 16:07:50 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 3 points 10 hoursMay 2, 2025 16:38:31 ago (+3/-0)*
This is the worst case scenario.
It's even worst than mRNA genetically raping the people who are injected with it. CRISPR gene editing goes on forever. As long as that genetic material is intact, it will keep dividing and passing on this edited genetic code for eternity.
This has the potential to "Vaccinate" anyone who consumes these animals, and then pass on the genetic "vaccination" to their off-spring.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR#Evolution
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 hoursMay 2, 2025 17:47:59 ago (+0/-0)
Eating pigs with editted genes will not alter our genes any more than eating normal pigs. When you eat a pig, you do not start encoding the gene sequences of pigs into your genome. You just break down pig meat and absorb its constituent nutrients. The same thing happens with the modified pig meat. It does not alter your DNA. But it might do bad or unexpected things to the pig gene pool. It might cause the disease in question to become more virulent. It will almost certainly incentivize factory farmers to keep pigs in more densely packed living environments. Soon we’ll have square pigs like in space truckers.
That does not mean what you think it means. It is talking about the pig population acquiring traits through non-natural mutation/selection process.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 1 point 7 hoursMay 2, 2025 20:01:17 ago (+1/-0)*
It is EXACTLY what I mean.
When you body ingests the CRISPR altered protein, it will be taking up the non-natural CRISPR gene segments and using them to build cells in your own body.
And before you claim that eating pork will not transfer unaltered cells into your system. I suggest you revisit just one of the many examples of what happens when humans consume improperly cooked pork. Recall that some parasites (unaltered ingested cells) actually cross the blood-brain barrier, and can even end up inside the human eye, liver, and etc.
I seriously doubt there has been adequate studies done on this exact topic.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 hoursMay 2, 2025 21:04:25 ago (+0/-0)
No. Its clear you think the human population can “contract” modified genes from editted pigs. They can’t.
Wrong. There is nothing biologically unusual about these genes. They contain the same amino acids as DNA in an unmodified pig. And your body breaks down all the DNA into amino acids . Your body can’t tell the difference between the two versions of the gene . The DNA is denatured by your digestive tract.
But parasites are alive. The pig is dead when you eat it. Its cells do not multiply. Its cells are dead. You are saying that dead pig cells have some prion like behavior, and thats not reasonable. If it happened with “CRISPR” pig cells, it would happen with normal pig cells too. CRISPR cells are not different in that way.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 4 hoursMay 2, 2025 22:31:29 ago (+0/-0)
Proteins, from a Mother's breast milk, enter the babies blood stream and have TWO absolutely verified effects upon the infant cells.
- 1. The Mother's immune system transfers antibodies into the child's blood stream, VIA INGESTED BREAST MILK, which protects the infant for a matter of months. 100% proven.
- VIP 2. The Mother's INGESTED BREAST MILK transfers mRNA COVID-19 spike proteins into the infants blood stream and effectively vaccinates the infant. This also subjects the infant to all of the same potential side effects associated with direct mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. 100% proven.
As I said before... the mRNA can be transferred via the ingestion of proteins, and in fact do everything the direct vaccination does.
I invite you to dispute the above. I can provide the needed studies which prove my point.
[ + ] SmartArseWhiteBoy
[ - ] SmartArseWhiteBoy 0 points 18 minutesMay 3, 2025 03:12:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 3 points 11 hoursMay 2, 2025 16:23:12 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Eliack
[ - ] Eliack 1 point 4 hoursMay 2, 2025 22:37:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] oyveyo
[ - ] oyveyo 1 point 6 hoursMay 2, 2025 21:21:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PuddinTame
[ - ] PuddinTame 0 points 39 minutesMay 3, 2025 02:51:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 7 hoursMay 2, 2025 20:21:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WillisJaxson
[ - ] WillisJaxson 0 points 9 hoursMay 2, 2025 17:43:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] the_old_ones
[ - ] the_old_ones 0 points 10 hoursMay 2, 2025 17:29:39 ago (+0/-0)