You should care what he says. Controlled opp speaks unfiltered truth a majority of the time. "There is no con without confidence."
Also, consider his timeline. Have you read Solzhenitsyn? Had you heard of him before Peterson? There is no author in the last 300 years who lays out the JQ better than he. Peterson was on the trail of something and THAT is why they had to get control of him. Even when they did, The Gulag Archipelago escaped into the zeitgeist.
They narrowly dodged a bullet with Peterson. Got him under control just in time.
Even his own description that they lack empathy matches the lack of empathy he clearly has for non-Zionists.
I get that he talks like a child and that can appear innocent and vulnerable, but that projection of innocence and vulnerability is exactly what he describes dark triads doing.
As a clinical psychologist (and a former university prof) he would be well aware of the fact that you can't discriminate against people in a professional setting on the basis of disability (it is classified as a mental disorder under DSM-5). Disabilities fall under the prohibited grounds of discrimination in Canada. Disabilities need to be accommodated and treated.
If he is currently practising as a psychologist and has clients that are trying to have their dark triad treated, if the clients felt like he was giving them bad or substandard direction, they could open a human rights case against him based on these things he says in interviews. For the sake of his own protection he probably just doesn't take on clients with dark triad. If his goal was to keep his license (it's currently under challenge) he's an idiot. But it's entirely possible that he wants his license revoked so that he can play the victim. As a spokesperson within an industry intended to attract clients with things like dark triad, he is potentially damaging that business by the things he says. It would be like a plumber calling people with leaky pipes "worthless parasites": the plumber is hurting his business by what he says (and he might by extension be giving the entire industry of plumbing a bad name). The same principle applies in Peterson's case.
Peterson demonizes groups for his own gain, and plays it off like he is vulnerable and in need of protection. When you look at what he does while realizing what he reasonably knows professionally, my impression is that asking him if he's dark triad isn't too far out there.
Inflated self-esteem or a grandiose sense of self-importance or superiority Craving admiration Exploitative relationships (i.e., manipulation) Little to no empathy Identity is easily disturbed (i.e., can’t handle criticism) Lack of attachment and intimacy Feelings of depression or emptiness when not validated A sense of entitlement Can feel like others are envious of them, or may envy others
You literally can't go three responses deep without invoking muh fee fees. Even when you're actually trying, you're incapable of serious, rational thinking, and your entire gambit shows itself for what it always ends up being: an extended wahmen moment.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 7 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 10:25:05 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 16:15:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] autotic
[ - ] autotic 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 19:21:44 ago (+0/-0)
Also, consider his timeline. Have you read Solzhenitsyn? Had you heard of him before Peterson? There is no author in the last 300 years who lays out the JQ better than he. Peterson was on the trail of something and THAT is why they had to get control of him. Even when they did, The Gulag Archipelago escaped into the zeitgeist.
They narrowly dodged a bullet with Peterson. Got him under control just in time.
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 3 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 13:06:08 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 13:21:58 ago (+1/-0)
The same principle might apply to the dark triad. Has anyone ever asked Peterson if he is dark triad?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 15:38:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] autotic
[ - ] autotic 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 19:23:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 3 daysApr 26, 2025 07:57:59 ago (+0/-0)
Even his own description that they lack empathy matches the lack of empathy he clearly has for non-Zionists.
I get that he talks like a child and that can appear innocent and vulnerable, but that projection of innocence and vulnerability is exactly what he describes dark triads doing.
As a clinical psychologist (and a former university prof) he would be well aware of the fact that you can't discriminate against people in a professional setting on the basis of disability (it is classified as a mental disorder under DSM-5). Disabilities fall under the prohibited grounds of discrimination in Canada. Disabilities need to be accommodated and treated.
If he is currently practising as a psychologist and has clients that are trying to have their dark triad treated, if the clients felt like he was giving them bad or substandard direction, they could open a human rights case against him based on these things he says in interviews. For the sake of his own protection he probably just doesn't take on clients with dark triad. If his goal was to keep his license (it's currently under challenge) he's an idiot. But it's entirely possible that he wants his license revoked so that he can play the victim. As a spokesperson within an industry intended to attract clients with things like dark triad, he is potentially damaging that business by the things he says. It would be like a plumber calling people with leaky pipes "worthless parasites": the plumber is hurting his business by what he says (and he might by extension be giving the entire industry of plumbing a bad name). The same principle applies in Peterson's case.
Peterson demonizes groups for his own gain, and plays it off like he is vulnerable and in need of protection. When you look at what he does while realizing what he reasonably knows professionally, my impression is that asking him if he's dark triad isn't too far out there.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 11:35:39 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 09:56:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 16:16:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 16:32:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 10:09:34 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 10:30:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 10:38:38 ago (+0/-0)
Did you listen to his description? Its a good analysis of your nature. You are textbook NPD.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 2 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 10:59:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 11:25:39 ago (+1/-0)
Its called the DSM 5.
Craving admiration
Exploitative relationships (i.e., manipulation)
Little to no empathy
Identity is easily disturbed (i.e., can’t handle criticism)
Lack of attachment and intimacy
Feelings of depression or emptiness when not validated
A sense of entitlement
Can feel like others are envious of them, or may envy others
I feel like this is a bit of #5 and #9
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 11:31:15 ago (+0/-0)
Gg ez no re.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 11:33:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 12:02:37 ago (+0/-0)
You bore me.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 4 daysApr 25, 2025 15:37:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 15:46:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 4 daysApr 25, 2025 09:48:55 ago (+0/-0)