Sign into an existing account

No. Last time, the reporter lied, and it isn't a different group of people. The 4 anon sources are the people telling the story. You have no idea what information was shared or who is sharing that info.

In the original story, the reporter said that he saw classified information. That was a lie. There was no classified information. In the second story, 4 anon sources said Hegseth shared information inappropriately, and provided no evidence of any such thing.

The Secretary of Defense is allowed to have conversations with people about what he's doing. There has been no wrongdoing shown, other than the wrongdoing with regards of attacking Yemen for the benefit of Israel.

And, again, it's starting to look like Waltz brought that journalist into the chat and Hegseth didn't catch it. Hehseth is standing in the way of a group pf people inside the Trump Administration who want to attack Iran's nuclear facilities in accordance with the planned Isrseli attack that had been scheduled for Mid-May. If they manage to get Hegseth removed, the chances of a War With Iram escalate dramatically. Is that what you want to see happen?

Waltz created the first chat and brought that reporter into the chat, not Hegseth. But it's Hegseth getting the blame from the pro-zionist media who want a war with Iran. Can you not see what's happening, or do you want that war, too?

Hegseth and Gabbard want a deal with Iran. Waltz and Ratcliffe want the US to strike Iranian nuclear facilities and to topple the Iranian leadership for the benefit of Israel. This fight is being televised by those on the pro-Isrsel side and you're barfing up the talking points for them. Is it just because you hate Trump or do you want to see a war with Iran, too?