Yes, it's the NYT, I know not Voats most popular news outlet. But they broke it. I'll be interested to see the fallout from this, but I think it will be difficult for him to survive this career wise after his seconds got the axe earlier this week.
A shame, because he seemed promising and was pretty to look at.
according to four people with knowledge of the chat.
This shit again?
Sean Parnell, the chief Pentagon spokesman, did not respond to several requests for comment before this article was published.
Ie, several emails sent minutes before the story was published.
After it was published, Mr. Parnell responded on social media. “Another day, another old story — back from the dead,” he wrote. “There was no classified information in any Signal chat, no matter how many ways they try to write the story.”
So, there is no story to this story, just like last time.
The New York Times wants a war with Iran for the benefit of Israel. Hegseth stands in the way, so the NYT is doing what they do all the time. Lie their fuckin' ass off, using unnamed sources to cover for just making shit up.
[ - ] Storefront [op] 1 point 1 monthApr 20, 2025 23:44:26 ago (+1/-0)
I don't disagree with you in a general sense, but four is a lot of sources to be made up and I'd bet the real play is sources in govt that want Hegseth out and are leaking like crazy. Might be interesting I'd the leakers get sacked before him however.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 monthApr 21, 2025 06:49:16 ago (+1/-0)
Who said that there was 4? The guy writing the story? Why do you believe him that there is 4? What if he had said 15? Would that make it more or less believable?
Greg Jaffe, Eric Schmitt and Maggie Haberman
Every single one of these people have tried to convince you that Trump collided with Russia, that Ukraine was winning, and that Trump caused an insurrection. These are not credible people. Stop believing anything that they say unless they provide proof.
There is an internal struggle going on between people that want a war with Iran for the benefit of Israel, and those who don't. These authors want that war, like they've wanted every war prior.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 1 monthApr 20, 2025 22:30:51 ago (+6/-0)*
Ie, several emails sent minutes before the story was published.
So, there is no story to this story, just like last time.
The New York Times wants a war with Iran for the benefit of Israel. Hegseth stands in the way, so the NYT is doing what they do all the time. Lie their fuckin' ass off, using unnamed sources to cover for just making shit up.
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront [op] 1 point 1 monthApr 20, 2025 23:44:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 monthApr 21, 2025 06:49:16 ago (+1/-0)
Every single one of these people have tried to convince you that Trump collided with Russia, that Ukraine was winning, and that Trump caused an insurrection. These are not credible people. Stop believing anything that they say unless they provide proof.
There is an internal struggle going on between people that want a war with Iran for the benefit of Israel, and those who don't. These authors want that war, like they've wanted every war prior.
[ + ] Storefront
[ - ] Storefront [op] 1 point 1 monthApr 21, 2025 10:32:24 ago (+1/-0)
Interesting stuff, love your posts.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 monthApr 21, 2025 11:37:37 ago (+1/-0)
And the sacking was 4 pro- war with Iran guys, too.
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 2 points 1 monthApr 21, 2025 01:39:10 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 2 points 1 monthApr 20, 2025 22:40:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 1 monthApr 20, 2025 21:21:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 1 monthApr 20, 2025 21:15:21 ago (+1/-2)
I hate to see turnover this early but Hegseth is a whore. His own mother thought he was an asshole.