Martin Heidegger's Nazi works primarily include his involvement with the National Socialist movement during the Nazi era, particularly his brief but highly publicized tenure as rector of Freiburg University in 1933. He also wrote and lectured extensively during this period, including his "The Origin of the Work of Art" (1935). His "Black Notebooks", a collection of journals written between 1931 and 1970, revealed a darker side to his philosophy, including anti-semitic statements.
Key aspects of Heidegger's Nazi works:
Brief Rectorship at Freiburg University:
Heidegger briefly served as rector of Freiburg University, a position he resigned after just a few months due to criticism of his Nazi sympathies and his lack of success in his role.
The Origin of the Work of Art:
While not explicitly a Nazi work, this lecture explores themes that resonate with the Nazi ideology, particularly its focus on a sense of national identity and a rejection of modern, technological society.
Black Notebooks:
These journals, published in 2014, reveal Heidegger's deep-seated anti-semitism and his views on the modern technological world as a threat to meaning.
Silence on the Holocaust:
After 1945, Heidegger never publicly addressed the Holocaust, leading to accusations of silence and disengagement with the horrors of the Nazi regime.
I dunno. Adversaries can often be the best to look to for praise. Some notable, I forget which, said something to the effect that Heidegger was a piece of shit AND the greatest philosopher of the twentieth century.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 16:00:25 ago (+1/-0)
He could be the best mind to have ever lived or the dumbest muther fucker on the planet. Point is, jew programmed AI ain't gonna tell you like it is, especially re white supremacists.
I ask the AI - how did Heidegger critique bourgeois society
Heidegger critiqued bourgeois society, particularly its emphasis on individual comfort and conformity, by arguing that it leads to a "they" mentality, where individuals hide from their own mortality and authenticity. He believed this resulted in a loss of connection to Being and an overemphasis on technology and a rationalized view of the world.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
The "They" and Inauthentic Living:
Heidegger used the concept of "das Man" or "the They" to describe the anonymous, impersonal forces that shape modern society. He argued that individuals often shy away from confronting their own finitude and instead seek comfort and belonging within this collective "they". This conformity prevents them from engaging in authentic, meaningful existence.
Critique of Technology:
Heidegger saw technology as a major force in the decline of Being. He argued that modern technology reduces the world to a collection of resources and objects, emphasizing human control and manipulation over a deeper engagement with reality. This, in turn, leads to a loss of appreciation for the unique characteristics of individual things and a reduction of human experience to mere functional needs.
Emphasis on Rationality and Calculation:
Heidegger criticized the bourgeois society's tendency to view the world through a lens of rational calculation and control. He believed this led to a dehumanizing view of nature and human beings alike, focusing on efficiency and productivity rather than deeper meaning.
Loss of Connection to Being:
Ultimately, Heidegger's critique of bourgeois society centered on the idea that it prevents individuals from fully experiencing their own being. He believed that true freedom and authenticity lie in confronting the reality of death, embracing finitude, and connecting with the deeper meaning of Being.
The quote by Martin Heidegger, referencing the Führer, is: "The Führer himself and he alone is the German reality, present and future, and its law". He uttered these words in 1933 while at Freiburg University, shortly after becoming its rector and joining the Nazi Party. This quote demonstrates Heidegger's endorsement of the Nazi Führer principle, where the leader is seen as the sole embodiment of truth and law.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Context:
Heidegger's quote was made during a period of intense political upheaval and the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany.
Content:
The quote directly links the Führer (Hitler) to the very essence of German reality and law, suggesting that all aspects of German life are governed by the Führer's will.
Meaning:
This quote reflects Heidegger's embrace of the Nazi ideology and his subordination of individual thought and freedom to the authority of the Führer.
Significance:
It is a key example of Heidegger's problematic involvement with Nazism and raises questions about his philosophical views and their connection to political reality.
The statement "Heidegger, the Führer is the law" reflects a key aspect of Heidegger's controversial political stance during the Nazi period. He embraced the Führer principle, associating it with his philosophical concepts of Being and the call of German destiny, effectively giving ontological sanction to Hitler's absolute rule. This endorsement was expressed in his lectures and writings, aligning his philosophy with the Nazi ideology. Elaboration:
Heidegger's Embrace of the Führer Principle:
Heidegger's philosophy, particularly his concept of Being and the call of destiny, was interpreted by him as aligning with the Führer principle. He saw the Führer as a manifestation of this "calling," a figure who embodies the essence of the German people and their destiny.
Ontological Justification:
He argued that the origin of political action lies not in knowledge but in Being itself, thus justifying the Führer's authority as a direct expression of Being.
Political Texts and Lectures:
Heidegger's views were expressed in his lectures and political texts during the Nazi period, explicitly endorsing the Führer principle and aligning it with his philosophical framework. For instance, he stated that "The Führer himself and he alone is German reality and its law, today and for the future,".
Significance:
This endorsement of the Führer principle, along with Heidegger's subsequent actions as Rector of Freiburg University, highlight the problematic intersection of his philosophy and the Nazi regime. His actions included pushing the Nazi agenda and the reorganization of universities, according to Philosophy Now.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:57:38 ago (+0/-0)
Ask it about proof of the holohoax, see what happens.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:58:03 ago (+0/-0)
Dugin is of course heavily influenced by him.
More:
https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/is-heidegger-contaminated-by-nazism
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 16:00:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:32:33 ago (+0/-0)
Heidegger critiqued bourgeois society, particularly its emphasis on individual comfort and conformity, by arguing that it leads to a "they" mentality, where individuals hide from their own mortality and authenticity. He believed this resulted in a loss of connection to Being and an overemphasis on technology and a rationalized view of the world.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
The "They" and Inauthentic Living:
Heidegger used the concept of "das Man" or "the They" to describe the anonymous, impersonal forces that shape modern society. He argued that individuals often shy away from confronting their own finitude and instead seek comfort and belonging within this collective "they". This conformity prevents them from engaging in authentic, meaningful existence.
Critique of Technology:
Heidegger saw technology as a major force in the decline of Being. He argued that modern technology reduces the world to a collection of resources and objects, emphasizing human control and manipulation over a deeper engagement with reality. This, in turn, leads to a loss of appreciation for the unique characteristics of individual things and a reduction of human experience to mere functional needs.
Emphasis on Rationality and Calculation:
Heidegger criticized the bourgeois society's tendency to view the world through a lens of rational calculation and control. He believed this led to a dehumanizing view of nature and human beings alike, focusing on efficiency and productivity rather than deeper meaning.
Loss of Connection to Being:
Ultimately, Heidegger's critique of bourgeois society centered on the idea that it prevents individuals from fully experiencing their own being. He believed that true freedom and authenticity lie in confronting the reality of death, embracing finitude, and connecting with the deeper meaning of Being.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:30:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:28:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:26:31 ago (+0/-0)
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Context:
Heidegger's quote was made during a period of intense political upheaval and the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany.
Content:
The quote directly links the Führer (Hitler) to the very essence of German reality and law, suggesting that all aspects of German life are governed by the Führer's will.
Meaning:
This quote reflects Heidegger's embrace of the Nazi ideology and his subordination of individual thought and freedom to the authority of the Führer.
Significance:
It is a key example of Heidegger's problematic involvement with Nazism and raises questions about his philosophical views and their connection to political reality.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:24:12 ago (+0/-0)
Elaboration:
Heidegger's Embrace of the Führer Principle:
Heidegger's philosophy, particularly his concept of Being and the call of destiny, was interpreted by him as aligning with the Führer principle. He saw the Führer as a manifestation of this "calling," a figure who embodies the essence of the German people and their destiny.
Ontological Justification:
He argued that the origin of political action lies not in knowledge but in Being itself, thus justifying the Führer's authority as a direct expression of Being.
Political Texts and Lectures:
Heidegger's views were expressed in his lectures and political texts during the Nazi period, explicitly endorsing the Führer principle and aligning it with his philosophical framework. For instance, he stated that "The Führer himself and he alone is German reality and its law, today and for the future,".
Significance:
This endorsement of the Führer principle, along with Heidegger's subsequent actions as Rector of Freiburg University, highlight the problematic intersection of his philosophy and the Nazi regime. His actions included pushing the Nazi agenda and the reorganization of universities, according to Philosophy Now.