☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

Six men charged after woman was forcibly removed from Idaho town hall meeting

submitted by Sal_180 to news 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 12:55:01 ago (+1/-1)     (www.ktvb.com)

https://www.ktvb.com/video/news/local/idaho/six-men-charged-after-woman-was-forcibly-removed-from-idaho-town-hall-meeting/277-3a3a86ff-cc66-4ee6-a36c-8609e149859d



18 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 1 weekApr 19, 2025 01:41:12 ago (+0/-0)

Town hall meeting. Had no right to even tell her to leave, which itself is a civil rights violation for deprivation of redressing government.

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 2 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 13:35:02 ago (+2/-0)

The Cunt was asked multiple times to leave, and was given several warnings that force would be used if she didn't go on her own.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeytIg5F0UA

Here is a viral video of it. The fucking leftist Cunt deserved everything she received and more.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:12:29 ago (+1/-0)

Nope. Security cannot lay hands on you to remove you unless you get violent. All they can do is call the cops. The cops must issue a tresspas notice and then they can arrest you if you refuse to leave.

[ - ] observation1 -1 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 17:06:47 ago (+0/-1)

Thats not true at all.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 1 weekApr 19, 2025 01:45:26 ago (+0/-0)

It most certainly is. Private security is there to observe and report unless their is an immenent threat if harm to others.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 1 weekApr 18, 2025 18:10:23 ago (+1/-0)

If it's a public town hall people have the right to speak left or right crazy or not. Unless she was disrupting or being violent herself in case they could have called the cops.

Be careful if you're looking for silencing people because the next person it'll be silenced is you. Town Hall meetings are supposed to be open to the public.

I don't know what the specific incidents was but be careful what you wish for.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 1 weekApr 19, 2025 01:43:55 ago (+0/-0)

I like the first amendment and I like when leftists show that they are stupid.

Further that was private security at a public political event. Call the police for disturbing the peace if she was committing a crime.

[ - ] Sal_180 [op] -1 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:41:57 ago (+0/-1)

Not surprised you support a group of men assaulting a woman

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 14:44:38 ago (+0/-0)

The Cunt was asked to leave peacefully multiple times by the Sheriff of that county. She refused. If those men wanted to actually injure that Communist-cunt, then she would have beaten to a pulp.

I'm not surprised you support a mouthy leftist-cunt whose only purpose was to endlessly disrupt a peaceful public meeting.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:13:02 ago (+2/-0)

Why didn't the Sheriff have her arrested? Why let security assault her?

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:21:07 ago (+0/-0)

He was there. Identified himself multiple times, and repeatedly warned the woman. Perhaps he thought it was best to allow the paid security to do the job they were getting paid to do?

There is a full version of this video out there. The entire confrontation once the Sheriff got involved was over 7 minutes long. At least 5 minutes of it was spent asking that bitch to comply peacefully.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:22:46 ago (+0/-0)

Big mistake.

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:24:58 ago (+0/-0)

On the part of the Communist-Cunt of a woman. Yes.

The video, the legal orders given by the Sheriff, and the complete record of her chain disruptions, and refusal to comply will be her downfall.

Mark my words.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:43:27 ago (+0/-0)

6 people were charged with assault by the County Attorney. Surely, they knew the circumstances. If the charges get dropped now, they could sue for wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution. It looks like they are all in on protecting her.

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:48:54 ago (+0/-0)

You can get charged with anything if you get an officer willing to sign the complaint. It doesn't mean that they will actually be found guilty of anything.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 15:54:49 ago (+0/-0)

No. To be charged would mean that the prosecutor thinks there's a case and filed an information. And again, if that prosecutor is wrong, those arrested could sue.

Being arrested only requires a complaint. Being charged is a step beyond an arrest, following a review by the prosecutor. We'll see how it goes. But if the sherif was there, he should have gotten the police involved. They have qualified immunity when they effect an arrest. They could have arrested her, removed her, and no filed on the complaint, then released her if they didn't want to pursue actual changes against her.
Continue thread

[ - ] observation1 0 points 2 weeksApr 18, 2025 17:11:52 ago (+0/-0)

The McCloskeys were "charged" by Attorney Kim Gardner too.

Now their records are now expunged. During the trial the judge openly wondered what gave with the politically motovated charge.

Being charged doesnt mean shit. And yes, security can remove you from an event.

Why are you such a retard, always, about this kind of stuff. Embarassing for you. Stop reading leftist drivel.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 1 weekApr 19, 2025 01:47:03 ago (+0/-0)

There job is not assault. Observe, report, protect. The sheriff should have done his job instead of letting some meathead thugs violate her civil rights.