It's been a while since I've made a post here, though I'm not lacking for comment responses and good discussions.
Lately, though, I've been irritated by the number of NPCs who are quoting Einstein's definition of insanity to me. You know the one: "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."
Einstein was a patent thief, and a jew with a persistent mockery of scientific method.
The definition of insanity is far more simple than that one. And it's not even required to use one single definition; that's the trap. There is a good definition that stands above many others, and from which many others can be created that branch out from it.
Here's the REAL definition of insanity: "it's an inability to accept the Truth when it is presented to you, directly."
Using that definition, how many of the people you know, both right and left leaning, would fail the test of that definition?
For the sake of circumstances, I can present to you some further examples of the definition.
1. An inability to learn from a negative result, no matter how small (this one parallels Einstein's definition, but is much more focused).
2. The lack of mental progress in determining what resources one can use or learn to better himself or his environment at no cost to anyone or no competition with anyone, thus giving rise to all.
3. Staying solely in ONE place.
4. Desiring what is not impossible, but failing to earn or create it.
5. Conformity with those who are provably wrong.
6. Acting like a problem exists when a solution has been provided and implemented successfully.
7. Being unable to grow out of behaving like a child as an adult, or behaving like an adult when you are a child.
8. Ignorance of God's existence or forming a personal connection to the higher Divine being that requires worship.
Which of the above definitions suits your perspective and experience the best?
By no means am I suggesting that you accept anything that I am talking about here on face value. Test for yourself and determine the outcome. I only want to promote the discussion that leads to better circumstances for all of us.
Edit 4.11.2025. Such thoughtful responses! I'm so glad to be having this discussion. I've thought further about the subject, and I have some more definitions to add above.
You might ask why I added a religious aspect to the last one. It's actually quite simple; there's a reason why the Bible is not being taught in schools, and it's because it forces children to consider moral implications of logic. While being "progressive" is the phrase used by the degenerates who refuse worship, creating a personal connection to God is something that removes insanity completely, especially when acting in God's benefit only solidifies one's true calling.
It is important to also remember that 'insanity' is not a term used in medicine or psychology, and its' only technical usage is actually in law, where the condition of the mind is found to be such that an individual cannot be held liable for their actions.
Here's the real kicker: in law, you're considered insane if you follow the law by default.
Sanity comes from confessing "insanity" through following through on knowing your own personal rights, and especially if you know the difference between legal and lawful.
Always arm yourself with the mental tools you need to fight the battle that they present you with.
Contrary to what you may think, there's a shit ton of thought provoking arguments that happen here daily; it's only up to the readers' individual perspective to catch the glimpses of fluid discussions that hold weight to what is being talked about.
Now that I live every day like it's my last (thank you corona panic), it's become so much easier to tell who's talking shit and who means what they say, even though they're wrapped up in their own, personal, egoic battles.
This. I drop high quality info here and there and most people don't even pick up on it. I am a high level ninja with connections all over the world and have inside information straight for S-3
AKCHUALLY I came to learn that cognitive dissonance is not just holding two conflicting ideas at the same time, but it is characterized as the discomfort or "psychological conflict" that arises from holding two contradicting/conflicting ideas.
That actually explained so much, because so fucking many people who should be experiencing cognitive dissonance (and are, according to your understanding and my previous understanding) don't. They blissfully will tell you two completely contradictory beliefs they hold in the same sentence and think nothing of it. Easiest example:
GAYS FOR PALESTINE
Palestine runs counter to all things gay, yet faggots are out there like "we love those guys!" But it could also explain why those dipshits are always so miserable - even if on the surface they don't acknowledge the conflict, the brain is an organ that seeks order and sense. To force feed it contradictions and lies is to set yourself up for misery.
It's an idea that can only be transmitted through enforcement, not experience, because it doesn't line up with experience. Most of the people who accept transgenders are not familiar with their behaviors or actions, just fools who are attempting to display their conformity as a badge of acceptance out of the fear of traveling away from the herd.
No, you were right the first time, at least for some of them, they CAN'T accept the truth. They are reprobates.
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
an inability to accept the Truth when it is presented to you directly
The problem with that definition is the usually false presumption of truth by the presenter, at least when it's a human and not one's own experience.
The straight facts about insanity are these: it has been in use in English since the late 16th century, for the first two hundred years or so carrying only the literal meaning “the condition of being mentally deranged.”
My definition would be more along the lines of "being disconnected from consensus reality". Things like 'remote viewing' might have a basis in fact, but you'll be considered insane if you profess your belief in such things.
The problem with that definition is the usually false presumption of truth by the presenter, at least when it's a human and not one's own experience.
- Agreed, when both parties don't know truth, it's usually not talked about correctly or explored with the right perspective. However, in this case, for the definition, I capitalized Truth, simply because it verifies that this Truth is correct, because it stands above the false perception that we have all been bred from our infancy to accept as reality.
My definition would be more along the lines of "being disconnected from consensus reality". Things like 'remote viewing' might have a basis in fact, but you'll be considered insane if you profess your belief in such things.
- Remote viewing is real, it's one of the abilities that people can nurture through training in themselves. These concepts are real and were explored in the George Clooney movie "the Men who Stare at Goats." It's possible to "feel" your way into environments and objects when they're far away from you, simply through practice and intense meditation. Not something that any and all can achieve.
Most quotes attributed to Einstein are also fraudulent. I have a general rule with quotes: if it doesn't include the title of the book and a page number, or the title of the speech and the date delivered, it's a fake quote.
I've done some uploads at old Voat about that fraud kike. I might've made one here, I can't remember. He was a real pos and a thief. The coward wouldn't go to gatherings where the great scientists of the day were because he knew he would be exposed but the CIA/israel pushed him into the light. They do the same thing with jewish youtubers, musicians, etc.
A healthy dose of jew hatred every day reminds one that a pursuit of better circumstances for himself is the pursuit of better circumstances for everyone, and the bane of jewish existence.
I'm the old Alexander from the original VOAT, the one who started that thread on the history of VOAT and found out about Whoaverse. Also the guy who was always on FatPeopleHate when he was working out constantly.
Well,repetition is a major part of most forms of insanity. But I've always felt it fell a little short too. How about "insanity is disconnecting from reality and falling into delusion"? That should cover a lot of it.
What's even worse is the attempt by the masses to enforce this "fairness for all" doctrine through the absolute removal and subsequent cognitive dissonance of the medical problems that await those who continue to irreparably race-mix.
If you're looking for a laugh, read the thread on X about the doctor who pointed out that white and black parents have children that are so different in genetic history from both parents that they cannot accept blood or organ donations from their own parents. The screeching was immediate and loud.
Based on what you said, it's actually more "normal" for human existence to rebel against such prejudice and become "sane" through refusing to accept degeneration and perversion of society and one's history and culture as "normal."
These forums are great for practicing what we end up preaching in the many different groups that we come across every day of the week - be it through family or friend, obligations for work or sport or leisure; sometimes I can see how people might think we are insane for all of those reasons and more for the things we say here, but this place has definitely given me more creative sparks that has influenced many aspects of my life than any other websites before.
On that note, it is insane to limit any type of speech - be it vulgar or “racist” or truthful or hurtful - and expect any related problems to go away.
I learned at a job with some fucked up 3D printers what the definition of insanity truly is.
It's doing something a bunch of different ways and getting the same outcome no matter what you do. Change half a dozen raw, physical changes, same outcome. I lost my mind, you would too.
You're still smart enough to identify that you lost something going through the motions of having to do the same thing without a permanent overall solution.
[ - ] bohmoonx 1 point 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 23:41:14 ago (+1/-0)
A woman who is transitioning her young son to female believes they accepted "The Truth"! I believe it's insane but are too many people out there to support her. So the definition needs work.
Unfortunately I grew up with several people who committed murder. The only one I would consider insane was the guy who set his ex girlfriend house on fire killing her. He did accepted "The Truth" and was fine with it.
Here's some Truth. Just because it's legal doesn't mean that it is moral or decent. Universal consequences for one's actions exist regardless of Man's punishment.
It's up for debate. Many say that it was Einstein. A lot of people argue the origin of a lot of his material because of how prolific of a thief he was. I would love an explanation of the origin of the quote, should you or anyone else offer one.
Here's the REAL definition of insanity: "it's an inability to accept the Truth when it is presented to you, directly."
That's a really good definition and it lines up with what the Bible teaches in Romans 1:28:
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient"
This is talking about people who, because they did not give God place in their lives, He curses them to be unable to tell right from wrong and truth from lies.
There's a reason that the Bible is not taught in schools, and that's because it's one of the best learning tools EVER made. It contains a foundation to understanding law, reason, morality, and consequences. All of those roles are necessary in the development of children into adults.
Looking at this from another perspective, especially now that you've mentioned it, it seems the entire purpose of modern schooling isn't to give children the tools they need to grow into healthy, mature adults, but instead to keep them as close to behaving like adult-children as possible.
doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result
Same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...expectancy tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes.
REAL definition
Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL aka ones reaction within action. Definition implies "defining action" aka affixing that which moves.
Consenting to a suggested DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) while affixing suggested words upon perceivable sound.
Nature moves...few within tempt many to affix labels (words) on what nature moves (sound), which represents a) spell-craft and b) idolatry.
Insane
Few suggest the label "insane person" to tempt many to ignore the implication of being in-sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound).
einstein
Aka ONE (ein) SAINT (st) ONE (ein)...saint/sacred - "set apart" aka the oneness of all (whole) setting apart each one within (partials) aka "all for one and one for all".
Consider being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka instrument within sound. Believing implies holding onto suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
The difference in-between suggested information and perceivable inspiration is that the former tempts one to hold onto it; while the latter can't be held onto...since it moves.
All sound/sanus (entire; whole) allows each one (partial) within to shape by free will of choice...any word tempts ones free will of choice to a) hold onto the shape, while ignoring the moving origin of sound, and b) bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Shaping words (fiction) within sound (reality) implies spell-craft...
the wrong idea
a) Ideal (mental) + idol (physical) implies oneself holding onto the suggestion of another, hence idolatry of idealism.
b) Having choice implies being within balance, hence in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...choosing to hold onto a side implies imbalance for ones choice. This imbalance is called "reason", hence for your example a right vs wrong conflict. Both sides establish a VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" aka an inversion of ones choice.
In other words...choice exists at center of balance; others suggest imbalance to draw ones choice into circumference.
Whatever suggested side (right or wrong; true of false; yes or no; agree or disagree; belief or disbelief; want or not want etc.) one chooses to hold onto, positions one against all those who choose the other side. This is how a suggesting few gain control over both sides of every conflict of reason among a consenting many.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (versus) prevents conflict aka imbalance...if one chooses to resist the tempting choices of another.
Their insanity is based in facts, and perverted by lies.
While they are righteous in their quest to reject face value opinions and science, they are wrong for not deriving their own countermeasures and coming up with better solutions than simply mocking those who don't support them.
[ - ] Love240 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:47:51 ago (+1/-0)
It's not based on facts though, it's based on lies.
The perversion is in the way they teach them to think about those lies. I.E. Not to and instead simply mock, like you said.
The problem is not that they are wrong, it's that they are convinced they don't need to comprehend and/or be able to explain anything logically and reasonably to be right, because their 'side' already has the correct answer.
[ + ] TheodoreKent
[ - ] TheodoreKent 11 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:30:18 ago (+11/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:34:41 ago (+1/-0)
Sanity comes from confessing "insanity" through following through on knowing your own personal rights, and especially if you know the difference between legal and lawful.
Always arm yourself with the mental tools you need to fight the battle that they present you with.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 8 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 18:48:55 ago (+9/-1)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 5 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 22:20:14 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 09:03:27 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:58:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:37:01 ago (+2/-0)
Now that I live every day like it's my last (thank you corona panic), it's become so much easier to tell who's talking shit and who means what they say, even though they're wrapped up in their own, personal, egoic battles.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:57:46 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 07:13:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 5 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:17:56 ago (+5/-0)
That's actually the definition of Cognitive Dissonance
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 5 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:37:38 ago (+5/-0)
That actually explained so much, because so fucking many people who should be experiencing cognitive dissonance (and are, according to your understanding and my previous understanding) don't. They blissfully will tell you two completely contradictory beliefs they hold in the same sentence and think nothing of it. Easiest example:
GAYS FOR PALESTINE
Palestine runs counter to all things gay, yet faggots are out there like "we love those guys!" But it could also explain why those dipshits are always so miserable - even if on the surface they don't acknowledge the conflict, the brain is an organ that seeks order and sense. To force feed it contradictions and lies is to set yourself up for misery.
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 2 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 23:09:04 ago (+2/-0)
This is actually demoralazation
https://youtube.com/shorts/FmXLsmIqOio
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 3 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:26:27 ago (+3/-0)
Weaponized, contagious, insanity.
[ + ] Portmanure
[ - ] Portmanure 5 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:36:36 ago (+5/-0)
can’twon’t accept the truth. Those that accept them are also insane.[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 3 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:46:01 ago (+3/-0)
It's an idea that can only be transmitted through enforcement, not experience, because it doesn't line up with experience. Most of the people who accept transgenders are not familiar with their behaviors or actions, just fools who are attempting to display their conformity as a badge of acceptance out of the fear of traveling away from the herd.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 13:08:14 ago (+1/-0)
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 4 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 20:24:58 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 3 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:37:33 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 3 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 19:22:44 ago (+3/-0)
The problem with that definition is the usually false presumption of truth by the presenter, at least when it's a human and not one's own experience.
My definition would be more along the lines of "being disconnected from consensus reality". Things like 'remote viewing' might have a basis in fact, but you'll be considered insane if you profess your belief in such things.
Good post.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:42:07 ago (+1/-0)
- Agreed, when both parties don't know truth, it's usually not talked about correctly or explored with the right perspective. However, in this case, for the definition, I capitalized Truth, simply because it verifies that this Truth is correct, because it stands above the false perception that we have all been bred from our infancy to accept as reality.
My definition would be more along the lines of "being disconnected from consensus reality". Things like 'remote viewing' might have a basis in fact, but you'll be considered insane if you profess your belief in such things.
- Remote viewing is real, it's one of the abilities that people can nurture through training in themselves. These concepts are real and were explored in the George Clooney movie "the Men who Stare at Goats." It's possible to "feel" your way into environments and objects when they're far away from you, simply through practice and intense meditation. Not something that any and all can achieve.
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 3 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 20:45:08 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:46:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Whatthefuck
[ - ] Whatthefuck 3 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:01:56 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 3 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 22:19:39 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 3 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:43:25 ago (+3/-0)
A healthy dose of jew hatred every day reminds one that a pursuit of better circumstances for himself is the pursuit of better circumstances for everyone, and the bane of jewish existence.
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 2 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 22:57:36 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 22:59:29 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] JohnnyKarateChop
[ - ] JohnnyKarateChop 2 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 23:52:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 11:12:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:43:58 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Trope
[ - ] Trope 2 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 19:58:09 ago (+2/-0)
My buddy Alex is who jew-pilled me.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:32:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:04:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:36:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Merlynn
[ - ] Merlynn 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 00:45:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:31:38 ago (+0/-0)
Falling into delusion isn't possible without acceptance.
We could say "rejecting reality in preference for the acceptance of mass conformity."
[ + ] Flanders
[ - ] Flanders 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:09:55 ago (+2/-0)
5. Conformity with those who are provably wrong.
The biggest would be the belief that universal fairness and equality
is desireable, or even acheiveable (if it were) for all races.
That is the one which does most harm to White people everwhere, and to our American country.
Those who have that mindset tend to have mixtures of all the others, and they do not realize the almost non-repairable harm to all of us.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:35:19 ago (+1/-0)
What's even worse is the attempt by the masses to enforce this "fairness for all" doctrine through the absolute removal and subsequent cognitive dissonance of the medical problems that await those who continue to irreparably race-mix.
If you're looking for a laugh, read the thread on X about the doctor who pointed out that white and black parents have children that are so different in genetic history from both parents that they cannot accept blood or organ donations from their own parents. The screeching was immediate and loud.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 02:11:03 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:31:23 ago (+1/-0)
Based on what you said, it's actually more "normal" for human existence to rebel against such prejudice and become "sane" through refusing to accept degeneration and perversion of society and one's history and culture as "normal."
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 19:27:33 ago (+1/-0)*
On that note, it is insane to limit any type of speech - be it vulgar or “racist” or truthful or hurtful - and expect any related problems to go away.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:41:20 ago (+0/-0)
It's insane to limit speech that doesn't cause one's advancement.
To allow a liar to continue to lie is insane, when the truth should silence his opinions forever.
[ + ] registered_bot
[ - ] registered_bot 1 point 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 23:23:07 ago (+1/-0)
It's doing something a bunch of different ways and getting the same outcome no matter what you do. Change half a dozen raw, physical changes, same outcome. I lost my mind, you would too.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:38:58 ago (+1/-0)
I call that progress, not stagnation.
[ + ] bohmoonx
[ - ] bohmoonx 1 point 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 23:41:14 ago (+1/-0)
Unfortunately I grew up with several people who committed murder. The only one I would consider insane was the guy who set his ex girlfriend house on fire killing her. He did accepted "The Truth" and was fine with it.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:37:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rowdybme
[ - ] Rowdybme 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:58:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:59:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Osmanthus
[ - ] Osmanthus 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 02:11:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:30:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SmartArseWhiteBoy
[ - ] SmartArseWhiteBoy 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 02:27:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:29:07 ago (+0/-0)
Does the possibility exist that following the rules of the fantasy can lead to direct or indirect harm?
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 04:18:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 11, 2025 12:13:37 ago (+0/-0)
Can you first define properly what you call sanity in a way that is completely whole?
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 12:55:31 ago (+1/-0)
That's a really good definition and it lines up with what the Bible teaches in Romans 1:28:
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient"
This is talking about people who, because they did not give God place in their lives, He curses them to be unable to tell right from wrong and truth from lies.
He INFLICTS insanity on those who hate Him.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 11, 2025 12:18:51 ago (+0/-0)
Looking at this from another perspective, especially now that you've mentioned it, it seems the entire purpose of modern schooling isn't to give children the tools they need to grow into healthy, mature adults, but instead to keep them as close to behaving like adult-children as possible.
[ + ] 1point21jiggawatts
[ - ] 1point21jiggawatts 1 point 2 weeksApr 12, 2025 13:34:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 0 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 22:55:15 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:40:03 ago (+1/-0)
You holding up okay? Just being in New York should give you a free pass to be as much of an asshole as you can possibly be.
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:49:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 11, 2025 12:15:16 ago (+0/-0)
So same thing as living in New York, I'd assume.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 04:00:37 ago (+1/-1)
Same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...expectancy tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes.
Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL aka ones reaction within action. Definition implies "defining action" aka affixing that which moves.
Consenting to a suggested DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) while affixing suggested words upon perceivable sound.
Nature moves...few within tempt many to affix labels (words) on what nature moves (sound), which represents a) spell-craft and b) idolatry.
Few suggest the label "insane person" to tempt many to ignore the implication of being in-sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound).
Aka ONE (ein) SAINT (st) ONE (ein)...saint/sacred - "set apart" aka the oneness of all (whole) setting apart each one within (partials) aka "all for one and one for all".
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 2 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 04:21:25 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 10:33:35 ago (+0/-0)
The biggest being that language is as fluid as belief. I agree with that sentiment wholeheartedly.
Belief in the wrong idea is a powerful tool for the creation of circumstances that one does not want.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 13:12:50 ago (+1/-0)
Consider being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka instrument within sound. Believing implies holding onto suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
The difference in-between suggested information and perceivable inspiration is that the former tempts one to hold onto it; while the latter can't be held onto...since it moves.
All sound/sanus (entire; whole) allows each one (partial) within to shape by free will of choice...any word tempts ones free will of choice to a) hold onto the shape, while ignoring the moving origin of sound, and b) bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Shaping words (fiction) within sound (reality) implies spell-craft...
a) Ideal (mental) + idol (physical) implies oneself holding onto the suggestion of another, hence idolatry of idealism.
b) Having choice implies being within balance, hence in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...choosing to hold onto a side implies imbalance for ones choice. This imbalance is called "reason", hence for your example a right vs wrong conflict. Both sides establish a VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" aka an inversion of ones choice.
In other words...choice exists at center of balance; others suggest imbalance to draw ones choice into circumference.
Whatever suggested side (right or wrong; true of false; yes or no; agree or disagree; belief or disbelief; want or not want etc.) one chooses to hold onto, positions one against all those who choose the other side. This is how a suggesting few gain control over both sides of every conflict of reason among a consenting many.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (versus) prevents conflict aka imbalance...if one chooses to resist the tempting choices of another.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:03:03 ago (+2/-3)
They simply cannot accept the truth when it is plainly presented right in front of their faces.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:42:53 ago (+1/-0)
While they are righteous in their quest to reject face value opinions and science, they are wrong for not deriving their own countermeasures and coming up with better solutions than simply mocking those who don't support them.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:47:51 ago (+1/-0)
The perversion is in the way they teach them to think about those lies. I.E. Not to and instead simply mock, like you said.
The problem is not that they are wrong, it's that they are convinced they don't need to comprehend and/or be able to explain anything logically and reasonably to be right, because their 'side' already has the correct answer.
"Why don't you just believe the science?!"
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 2 weeksApr 9, 2025 21:19:56 ago (+2/-2)
I just tell globe niggers, look dude, the government literally lies about EVERYTHING.
Name one thing they tell the truth about. And it's definitely NOT going to be what's in space and what they've been doing up there the past 100 years.
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 [op] 1 point 2 weeksApr 10, 2025 01:43:10 ago (+1/-0)