Sign into an existing account

Oh yes, i could believe that, plus The Tax take from tobacco is just outrageous. Someone may have mentioned it here on voat/ upgoat before, but any smoker should get preferential treatment from the health system simply based on the amount of tax they would have paid to the govt over a lifetime.

Most likely yes, does smoking / inhalation of tobacco have some negative health effects - very likely - but i really believe it's been over hyped and those effects use to take years/ decades to become fatal.

Maybe 10-15 years ago i searched all over the net for any clinical study's that used organic tobacco and someone that lived like a native South american shaman to see if 'additive free tobacco' presented similar detrimental health benefits to commercial tobacco use - no surprise couldnt find anything.

The sheer zeal that government funded/produced anti-smoking campaigns should be a massive red flag. The government was selling these campaigns as "we care about your health". The government- caring about your health, specifically the health of people who are older (the negative effects associated with smoking don't typically affect people until later in life, with some variation)- that's a far more outrageous statement than anything I've said.

If the government gave a shit about our health, they wouldn't lie about nutrition and force that indoctrination in schools. They wouldn't have been mandating fucking lockdowns- they'd be mandating "minimum of 30 minutes of cardio per day or you go to fucking prison", since obesity-related shit kills way more than anything else, including smoking-related diseases.

Instead, the government threw its lot in with "body positivity" bullshit, saying "it's okay to be fat and disgusting, just be you gurllll". I assume UncleDoug is down with that cause, because the government says it's good?

Tobacco is harmful to health, doesn’t matter who makes it. That you are seriously suggesting if tobacco is organic it doesnt cause cancer is ludicrous.