On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court made a historic decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, legalizing gay marriage nationwide. This landmark ruling marked the end of a decades-long battle, one that conservatives had fought tooth and nail to prevent. Despite losing ground on numerous other social issues, conservatives held steadfast in their opposition to gay marriage for generations. Why? The answer lies in their deeply held religious convictions, rooted in the Bible, which provided them with a sense of moral justification.
But when it came to stopping Whites from mixing races, and in preserving their White identity, White conservatives found themselves unable to summon a similar sense of moral righteousness. White Nationalism, once a prevalent ideology, has been banished to the shadows, branded as taboo and morally indefensible. Bereft of a compelling moral framework to sustain their resistance, Whites have proven vulnerable to the seductive pull of globalist ideologies and demographic trends that threaten their very existence.
This raises a critical question: how can Whites reclaim their sense of identity and resist the tide of multiracialism? The answer lies in fostering a renewed sense of moral justification. By spreading powerful quotes that awaken White consciousness and crafting compelling pro-White propaganda and arguments, we can rekindle the flame of pride and purpose in the hearts of our people. Only by embracing a morally grounded White Nationalism can we hope to halt the march of White Genocide and secure a future for our race.
It is time for Whites to rise, to cast off the chains of guilt and shame imposed by a society that seeks our dissolution. We must boldly assert our right to exist, to flourish, and to shape our own destiny. Through the power of words and ideas, we can forge a new moral bedrock, one that will inspire generations of Whites to come. The path is clear: awaken, unite, and fight for the survival of our people.
Whites should never glorify jew movies or jew-owned sports. And, we need to recognize that White quality of life is more important than the rat race of material oneupmanship that the jews themselves have, and which they try (sofar successfully) to spread and infect onto us.
(((Betty Berzon))) January 18, 1928–January 24, 2006
"Two years after [jewess] psychologist Betty Berzon came out as a lesbian in 1971, she won the fight to have the American Psychiatric Association declassify homosexuality as a mental illness." - Jewish Womens Archive Encyclopedia
Guilt is a racial trait that only White people are capable of experiencing. That's why there are holohoax museums everywhere in White countries.
Australians had nothing to do with jews being sent to safety camps while war raged across Europe. This is jews exploiting your racial guilt while they play the long game of White genocide through forced immigration.
Adelaide Holocaust Museum and Andrew Steiner Education Centre (Adelaide, South Australia) The Jewish Holocaust Centre (Melbourne, Victoria)[5] Leo Baeck Centre for Progressive Judaism (Kew, Victoria) Holocaust Memorial[6] Melbourne General Cemetery Holocaust Memorial (Parkville, Victoria)[7] Sydney Jewish Museum (Sydney)[8] Magen Shoah, The Central Synagogue (Sydney)
One fact is all you need to tell the Jews-Niggers-SPICs-Shitskins to fuck off.
Whites are 10% of the total global population.
If that other 90% can't fucking handle Whites wanting to live in peace around their own kind, then they can gladly go fuck off to the majority of the world that we have not developed, and civilized already.
The inflection point was when they started calling everyone either White or Black and the Jews stopped being a separate people but then “became White.”
If a non-White says we need to “stop White supremacy” it looks like they are self serving and people are skeptical. If a “White” person says it, they look seem rational and caring, and “legitimizes” it as a problem.
It used to be that different White races stuck to their own. And then White races started to race-mix.
Most Whites in the US are going to be some kind of racemix. Irish and German, English and Russian, etc. all of the racial lines were taken down with the effort of the groups becoming a mixing pot. After that happened, it became easier to describe groups in broad strokes. It also became socially easier to contemplate race mixing outside of the White races. "Everyone's a mutt, so why does it matter?"
The more we try to frame the conversation as "the White race" the more we lose track of the fact that "White" isn't actually a race, it's a range of races.
You are correct, White Unity is paramount. Historic National origin and national identities of Whites is something for the back burner. At 7% of the World population, Whites need to unite or perish. I love my national identity of Prussian, French, German, Irish, Welsh, and Corsican but if the White man is erased, so are all those potential divisions. WHITE UNITY AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.
I believe we should gravitate towards individually valued qualities rather than attested ancestries. Throw out divisions based on attested race and allow people to be grouped together by the fruits of their natures.
And that leads to the ultimate blurring of the lines with "human race" where everyone is considered the same.
I stand by my point. Your race can be White (within a category), but there is no such thing as a "singular White race". "White" is a range of races.
You can be united without losing appreciation for the differences between White races. But even then, the concept of unity among diverse races can eventually expand outward to encompass all races.
It's OK to have coalitions, but it remains important to recognize that White races are different and still inherently compete with each other.
If the global White population went from 20% to 8%, but the Irish race population in that same time hypothetically went from 1% to 3%, that race would be growing and getting more marketshare in the world population.
If you gave the Irish a choice of increasing the overall White population back to 20% but the Irish get reduced back to 1%, is that a good deal or a bad deal for the Irish?
The only way you could pitch that it is a good idea is that one form of race mixing (White with White) is preferable to other kinds of racemixing. But you will still ultimately be promoting some kind of race mixing. Potentially to the point of breeding out a race. This would especially happen if you had classes of people where the higher class races aren't forced to scrap for resources and form racial coalitions out of necessity to survive and grow.
Look at the US. Look at how many people have mixed White ancestries. We have memes on here about grandparents being visibly unsettled about mulatto grandchildren that look nothing like them. What about your respective ancestral lines from different White races that you look nothing like due to race mixing? The commentary is hypocritical at best.
And which race are hybrids exactly? You could argue that they are a distinct race. If all White races fused together to have that mixed race genetic profile as the average, perhaps you could call that a singular race. But it doesn't exist yet and that outcome would be at the expense of individual races. In principle it's not much different than other kinds of race mixing.
By asking someone to join the "White race mix project" you are potentially asking them to be a traitor to their own race for the sake of someone else's vision. And if a traitor to their own race, what would stop them from being a traitor to any new singular White race?
It's a slippery slope. We need to recognize that "White" is a range of races and respect the choices of individuals to watch after their own first. Their family first, their house first. Even before Churches and cities, the duties towards the house come first. That's Biblical.
In my thought, the race that you are trying to breed toward is the race that you belong to. There are going to be characteristics you value (whether it is mental, physical, etc) that you look for in a mate. The problem is misrepresentation. Someone that might have a genetic predisposition to poor impulse control and violence might be portrayed a certain way in media. And they may be able to mask those qualities while you are dating them (before committing to having children). The solution to that is to bring awareness and attention to things. To allow the truth to be unmasked and speak for itself.
But sometimes you are looking for a trait to amplify. Suppose you come from a family that has 6 fingers per hand and you want to preserve that trait. You may start gravitating toward other families that also have 6 fingers per hand.
The difficult-to-describe desirable qualities among many White races may or may not be present in other races. But the projection of those qualities onto others (limerance) may happen. That projection could be from one White race to another.
The situation is complicated. Education and awareness is one thing, but essentially enforcing something akin to arranged marriages and limiting types of race mixing to only White races with other White races sounds dystopian. The choice must come naturally and freely. Your concept of "White unity" is just another race mixing concept. Instead of dictating this by mandate, why not just let individuals decide for themselves?
Christianity is a civic nationalist religion. It served as glue to help disparate Europeans work together under several empires. And it's being used even today to make Europeans put up with niggers. Christianity gives no moral imperative to hate niggers.
true but Christianity is true, so we have to deal with reality. in heaven there is no skin color differences. on Earth we are called not to hate anyone but love them and forgive all sins. that doesnt mean there cant be peaceful white nationalist Christianity
[ + ] Flanders
[ - ] Flanders 6 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 02:27:27 ago (+6/-0)
(((Betty Berzon))) January 18, 1928–January 24, 2006
"Two years after [jewess] psychologist Betty Berzon came out as a lesbian in 1971, she won the fight to have the American Psychiatric Association declassify homosexuality as a mental illness." - Jewish Womens Archive Encyclopedia
[ + ] Puller_of_Noses
[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 4 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 03:31:30 ago (+4/-0)
That's why there are holohoax museums everywhere in White countries.
Australians had nothing to do with jews being sent to safety camps while war raged across Europe. This is jews exploiting your racial guilt while they play the long game of White genocide through forced immigration.
The Jewish Holocaust Centre (Melbourne, Victoria)[5]
Leo Baeck Centre for Progressive Judaism (Kew, Victoria) Holocaust Memorial[6]
Melbourne General Cemetery Holocaust Memorial (Parkville, Victoria)[7]
Sydney Jewish Museum (Sydney)[8]
Magen Shoah, The Central Synagogue (Sydney)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 4 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 00:24:25 ago (+4/-0)
If that other 90% can't fucking handle Whites wanting to live in peace around their own kind, then they can gladly go fuck off to the majority of the world that we have not developed, and civilized already.
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 7 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 01:36:31 ago (+7/-0)
8%, so even worse. But point obviously taken.
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 03:33:31 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 07:36:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 2 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 07:40:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Hugh
[ - ] Hugh 2 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 07:10:16 ago (+2/-0)
If a non-White says we need to “stop White supremacy” it looks like they are self serving and people are skeptical. If a “White” person says it, they look seem rational and caring, and “legitimizes” it as a problem.
That’s how they did it
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 4 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 09:43:02 ago (+4/-0)
Most Whites in the US are going to be some kind of racemix. Irish and German, English and Russian, etc. all of the racial lines were taken down with the effort of the groups becoming a mixing pot. After that happened, it became easier to describe groups in broad strokes. It also became socially easier to contemplate race mixing outside of the White races. "Everyone's a mutt, so why does it matter?"
The more we try to frame the conversation as "the White race" the more we lose track of the fact that "White" isn't actually a race, it's a range of races.
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 13:03:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 13:34:15 ago (+0/-0)
Historic National origin and national identities of Whites is something for the back burner. At 7% of the World population, Whites need to unite or perish.
I love my national identity of Prussian, French, German, Irish, Welsh, and Corsican but if the White man is erased, so are all those potential divisions.
WHITE UNITY AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 15:18:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 14:58:38 ago (+0/-0)
I stand by my point. Your race can be White (within a category), but there is no such thing as a "singular White race". "White" is a range of races.
You can be united without losing appreciation for the differences between White races. But even then, the concept of unity among diverse races can eventually expand outward to encompass all races.
It's OK to have coalitions, but it remains important to recognize that White races are different and still inherently compete with each other.
If the global White population went from 20% to 8%, but the Irish race population in that same time hypothetically went from 1% to 3%, that race would be growing and getting more marketshare in the world population.
If you gave the Irish a choice of increasing the overall White population back to 20% but the Irish get reduced back to 1%, is that a good deal or a bad deal for the Irish?
The only way you could pitch that it is a good idea is that one form of race mixing (White with White) is preferable to other kinds of racemixing. But you will still ultimately be promoting some kind of race mixing. Potentially to the point of breeding out a race. This would especially happen if you had classes of people where the higher class races aren't forced to scrap for resources and form racial coalitions out of necessity to survive and grow.
Look at the US. Look at how many people have mixed White ancestries. We have memes on here about grandparents being visibly unsettled about mulatto grandchildren that look nothing like them. What about your respective ancestral lines from different White races that you look nothing like due to race mixing? The commentary is hypocritical at best.
And which race are hybrids exactly? You could argue that they are a distinct race. If all White races fused together to have that mixed race genetic profile as the average, perhaps you could call that a singular race. But it doesn't exist yet and that outcome would be at the expense of individual races. In principle it's not much different than other kinds of race mixing.
By asking someone to join the "White race mix project" you are potentially asking them to be a traitor to their own race for the sake of someone else's vision. And if a traitor to their own race, what would stop them from being a traitor to any new singular White race?
It's a slippery slope. We need to recognize that "White" is a range of races and respect the choices of individuals to watch after their own first. Their family first, their house first. Even before Churches and cities, the duties towards the house come first. That's Biblical.
In my thought, the race that you are trying to breed toward is the race that you belong to. There are going to be characteristics you value (whether it is mental, physical, etc) that you look for in a mate. The problem is misrepresentation. Someone that might have a genetic predisposition to poor impulse control and violence might be portrayed a certain way in media. And they may be able to mask those qualities while you are dating them (before committing to having children). The solution to that is to bring awareness and attention to things. To allow the truth to be unmasked and speak for itself.
But sometimes you are looking for a trait to amplify. Suppose you come from a family that has 6 fingers per hand and you want to preserve that trait. You may start gravitating toward other families that also have 6 fingers per hand.
The difficult-to-describe desirable qualities among many White races may or may not be present in other races. But the projection of those qualities onto others (limerance) may happen. That projection could be from one White race to another.
The situation is complicated. Education and awareness is one thing, but essentially enforcing something akin to arranged marriages and limiting types of race mixing to only White races with other White races sounds dystopian. The choice must come naturally and freely. Your concept of "White unity" is just another race mixing concept. Instead of dictating this by mandate, why not just let individuals decide for themselves?
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler -1 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 15:23:00 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed [op] -1 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 15:59:35 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler -1 points 1 monthMar 21, 2025 23:28:00 ago (+0/-1)