Sign into an existing account

They're usually also one issue voters, that being abortion/pro-life. It's literally what they care about. Being pro or anti invasion means nothing to them. Being pro or anti gun means nothing. Being in favor of or against higher taxes means nothing. Being in favor of or against bringing in more H1B street shitters means nothing. That's a Christ cuck.

But guess what, the right wing pro-white christians on this site don’t see it that way. I wouldn’t either. Its insulting. Its meant to sexually humiliate anyone who worships Jesus. Say it or dont say it. But don’t say it and pretend it isn’t a massive fuck you to Christian allies on this site. I don’t say it because its needless ad hominem. I say Christian. I don’t need to say shit-piss-Jesus-dick-suckers. Its not productive.

Arab is semitic. Bronze age/Iron age Canaanites were closely related to NW arabians, syrians, and mesopotamians.

If we are interested in what modern AK jews are derived from we should understand the the people of the fertile crescent/ eaastern med were exchanging alot of genetics already, before there was such a thing as a jew/israelite. It should be understood that much of genetics of the middle east, turkey, greece iran is derived from caucasus hunter gatherer ancestry. So is europe but to a lesser extent. So when you are looking at the markers of modern jews, they are going to have similar ancient components to other groups like “arabs” and greeks and anatolians, etc. How did the caucasus markers get into AK jews? From turks/khazars in the middle ages? From canaanites of the iron age? Or from greeks or italians? Depending on what software package you are using and what your initial assumptions are you could get different results. That is the problem with these studies of DNA and ancient ancestry. There is some subjectivity involved in the analysis. And probably bias.

But I do believe that AK jews are at least 50% middle eastern. If some of that DNA was from Iraq, or Egypt, it wouldn’t be surprising. But you are overreaching to claim with any certainty that AKs could not possibly have 50% levantine ancestry.

HIstorians/Archeologist define Iron Age Levant as 1200 - 500 BC. The date might be a bit different in Europe or Asia. The Bronze Age is listed as 3300 - 1200 BC. I would argue that Iron age is a better era to reference. Everyone needs to understand that the ethnogenisis of the Israelites as described in the bible is totally false. This is provable to everyone that believes in genetics. Its not just the supernatural stuff thats false. The entire history is false. You can’t rely on the bible for such information anymore than you can rely on stories about Zeus for greek genetics.

The people that we call ancient israelites/hebrews who worshipped Yahweh in the Iron age and early historical periods (Hellenistic, Roman...) didn’t exist in the Bronze age. Furthermore they were not patrilineally descended from Abraham or anyone else. This can be shown by examining the Y chomosome haplogroups of ancient hebrews and modern jews. Both these groups have a high diversity of Y choromosomes including E1b, J1, J2, G2, etc. These are groups that diverged 20 to 80kya!

A group of canaanites were brought together civilly under military conquest sometime during the Iron age. Some speculate under King David. Theres no way to know. They were not related closely (Arabians, Syrians,Mesopotamian) . Gradually these separate tribes (goyim) assimilated to the prestige culture which worshipped Yahweh, or a conflation of Yahweh/El and lost their original ethnic identity (happens all the time).

The regime promoted a narrative that everyone was related to create political stability (similar to China promoting the relatedness of the Han). Later on the priests of Yahweh banned the worship of other gods as evil (to create a religious monopoly$$$) and eventually promoted monotheism (700-300 BC or later) . Plus there were forced conversions under the Maccabbees and voluntary conversions outside the levant throughout the Hellenistic and Roman periods.

Your chart is not genetically useful. I wouldn’t even agree on the order. I would compare Judaism during that period to more of a political party than anything else. The bible’s authors made ancient Canaan seem more religiously and genetically homogeneous than it actually was. They were never in Egypt. All this shit has been established by geneticists, biblical scholars and archeologists, many of whom are (practicing) jews and christians. The time period of the founding of the Israelite people in the bible is wrong. The patrilneality of the israelites is wrong. The monotheism of early Judaism is wrong.

The relatedness to Ashkhenazi Jews to the the people living in Canaan/palestine in the last millenia BC is a whole other ball of wax. Also essentially a lie. But I do believe that AKs are mostly patrilineally descended from middle eastern jewish adherents living in the middle east around 2000 years ago. Remember Judaism is not proselytizing now but is was during most ancient periods.

Arab usually is used like Hispanic, determined by language usage. But some of the Israelite ancestry was from immigrants from northwest arabia. The early worship of Yahweh may have come from bedouin warlords of this quarter. SE arabians are distinct from these. Im tempted to go into the relationship of the Hebrews to early Islam but Ill control myself.

Yes Im aware of the maternal bottleneck and that it is european. There were probably multiple bottlenecks along the way. I assume its a white slavery sort of thing. I doubt Christian European men were eager for their daughters to marry wandering kikes in the middle ages.