None of you get it. The judicial branch is not superior to the executive branch. The judicial branch cannot tell them with any force or meaning to stop doing any actions. The absolute only check on the power of the executive branch is impeachment which must come from Congress and the only role that judiciary plays in that is that the Chief Justice presides over the trial in the senate. Cody will branches means co-equal branches. I don't know why everybody keeps freaking out or why the Trump administration even acknowledges these judicial rulings about executive actions.
To show how crazy these judicial rulers are about executive actions imagine for a minute that the president suddenly looked at the judges and said you must rule a certain way and you must conduct your courts a certain way and you must do this and that and the other a certain way the way that I the president say. Everybody knows the president doesn't have the power to do that.
Or imagine the President says to Congress oh you must conduct your Congressional meetings this way you must conduct your business this way you must give seats and you must censor people this way and this that and the other will of course everybody laughs at that because people understand that there's a division of power and each branch runs itself and does not run the other branch.
It's the same for the judicial branch. The judicial branch does not have the power over Congress or the power over the presidency. Marbury versus Madison or the step in the wrong direction but even so it was advisory. It caused no direction to the executive branch because the justices knew that that would have been improper. Compliance with any judicial ruling as an opinion of what a president should do is completely voluntary and can be completely ignored by a president.
I'm really kind of getting tired of seeing both major news outlets and even smart people here talking as if these judges have the power to stop the president. It's ridiculous think about it it's ridiculous. The founder sat there and they said we do not want a judicial oligarchy and if a person has to follow what a judge says we don't have a presidency running the country we only have a judge running the country and the executive is only the person that does whatever the judge says and we know that's ridiculous.
The founders gave the president the most power. The founders did it because they knew that the president was the most direct representative of the people's will at any given time because the president is elected every four years unlike judiciary which is not elected mostly appointed for life and the Congress which as a whole Congress is not elected as often and as regularly. So the founders knew the president was the most important expression of the people's will. Or more accurately of the states as a whole will which supposedly would have been guided by the population of each state.
[ + ] DoYouEvenShit
[ - ] DoYouEvenShit 0 points 3 monthsMar 7, 2025 05:36:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 3 monthsMar 6, 2025 20:44:32 ago (+0/-0)
To show how crazy these judicial rulers are about executive actions imagine for a minute that the president suddenly looked at the judges and said you must rule a certain way and you must conduct your courts a certain way and you must do this and that and the other a certain way the way that I the president say. Everybody knows the president doesn't have the power to do that.
Or imagine the President says to Congress oh you must conduct your Congressional meetings this way you must conduct your business this way you must give seats and you must censor people this way and this that and the other will of course everybody laughs at that because people understand that there's a division of power and each branch runs itself and does not run the other branch.
It's the same for the judicial branch. The judicial branch does not have the power over Congress or the power over the presidency. Marbury versus Madison or the step in the wrong direction but even so it was advisory. It caused no direction to the executive branch because the justices knew that that would have been improper. Compliance with any judicial ruling as an opinion of what a president should do is completely voluntary and can be completely ignored by a president.
I'm really kind of getting tired of seeing both major news outlets and even smart people here talking as if these judges have the power to stop the president. It's ridiculous think about it it's ridiculous. The founder sat there and they said we do not want a judicial oligarchy and if a person has to follow what a judge says we don't have a presidency running the country we only have a judge running the country and the executive is only the person that does whatever the judge says and we know that's ridiculous.
The founders gave the president the most power. The founders did it because they knew that the president was the most direct representative of the people's will at any given time because the president is elected every four years unlike judiciary which is not elected mostly appointed for life and the Congress which as a whole Congress is not elected as often and as regularly. So the founders knew the president was the most important expression of the people's will. Or more accurately of the states as a whole will which supposedly would have been guided by the population of each state.