[ - ] dassar 1 point 1 monthMar 5, 2025 18:54:07 ago (+1/-0)
Despite widespread online speculation, legal experts question the plausibility of the ruling. How could a court mandate a payout to someone with no documented assets, particularly when the couple was neither married nor had children?
Bf and GF for almost one single year - he's is a homosexual that lives' in an Auckland apartment with his BF. The relationship was a literally a PR stunt. This is all bs.
Um what the living fuck? The court was ready to give half his money to her, but once they found out she owed him, they all of a sudden take into account they aren’t even married or have kids???
[ + ] SteppingRazor
[ - ] SteppingRazor 7 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 13:50:14 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] shitface9000
[ - ] shitface9000 5 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 14:27:51 ago (+5/-0)
HOWEVER, the ruling is specious and shouldn't hold on appeal.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 5 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 14:35:56 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 5 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 15:15:23 ago (+5/-0)
But would never happen if the guy was white.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 3 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 14:17:21 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 2 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 13:37:43 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 2 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 16:10:24 ago (+2/-0)
But the ethics of stringing a man along with a little pussy to rape him later is AAAAA-okay. uh huh. yeah.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 1 monthMar 5, 2025 18:54:07 ago (+1/-0)
Bf and GF for almost one single year - he's is a homosexual that lives' in an Auckland apartment with his BF. The relationship was a literally a PR stunt. This is all bs.
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 1 point 1 monthMar 5, 2025 21:49:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 15:53:30 ago (+0/-0)
Lame post is lame