I haven't seen evidence that this tranny was flying the Blackhawk and the flight path of the Blackhawk was not strange. It was EXACTLY on course, but 200' too high, which is easy to do.
Without loitering in an area, the odds of a Blackhawk striking an aircraft on final approach for runway 33 after sidestepping runway 1 on the request of ATC is ridiculously small. Certainly not plannable.
Umm, hitting an aircraft at a busy airport is easily plannable - what are you talking about?
How likely is that - opposed to human error/ miscalculation/ pilot error and or negligence - is more the question.
Even just on the limited 5-8 min clips i've seen/ heard online there at least 5-7 other aircraft lined up to land and or taking off. It would be as easy to purposely plan to T-bone another vehicle at a busy inner-city intersection.
No it isn't easily plannable. Not without loitering, which would be obvious to ATC and everyone that's looked at the video of the flight paths. What the fuck are YOU talking about.
It's fairly obvious what happened. Human error causing plane accidents is fucking a common occurrence. Happens literally once or twice a month, sometimes more. The ceiling for the flight path for that helicopter route is 200 AGL, which is low as fuck, and the Blackhawk got up to 400 agl, 200 feet higher than the ceiling, which is easy to do in something like a Blackhawk.
It is not easy to t-bone a plane doing 160 knots on approach, that's nearly 200 miles per hour. And, maybe you don't understand what the word loitering means. That helicopter was not hanging out just waiting for the right moment to try to hit an aircraft. It took off, flew exactly in the path it was supposed to fly, just 200 feet higher than allowed, and didn't speed up or slow down, at all, to adjust their impending trajectory.
Horizontal separation on aircraft on final approach is minimum 1 mile, except on parallel runways, where two aircraft landing of different runways can get closer to each other. It's not like you can just fly straight and steady from miles away and expect to hit a 100 foot target doing 200 mile an hour.
They aren't coming in every 30 seconds retard, and you would absolutely have to adjust speed, heading, and altitude to catch a plane doing 200+ mile an hour. Ffs, nigger, use your brain.
And yes, I am exactly saying that there is no fucking way that you, or anyone else, could take a Blackhawk and smack it into a regional jet on approach to land without it being obvious to everyone that the Blackhawk was trying to hit that jet. No fucking way possible. And, you sure as hell could not take off and fly through the approach pattern with no deviation and expect to hit a jet. Again, no fucking way possible, not even once.
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 01:37:11 ago (+1/-0)
Never ever said every 30 secs. Re-Watch the full audio/ flight map clip. you have 4 stacked for descent and landing - with one or two departing in that 8-9 minute clip. Easily a dozen in 30 minutes if the flights are consistent.
could take a Blackhawk and smack it into a regional jet on approach to land without it being obvious to everyone that the Blackhawk was trying to hit that jet. No fucking way possible.
and yet it did - and it was very obvious to all watching, that a wtf moment transpired.
You need to stop gripping, and loosen up - dipshit.
And yes, it did. In a tragedy that had no ability to planned and executed. Accidents caused by pilot error happen. It isn't plannable. Kill yourself, nigger.
Nigger, it isn't plannable, you utterly dumb fuckin' faggot. It doesn't matter how often flights land on either of their 2 simultaneously active runways.
Unless the helicopter hangs out in the flight path of a runway, or tries to intercept a plane that they are actively tracking, there is zero, ABSOLUTELY ZERO FUCKING CHANCE, that you could plan to take off, fly an exactly prescribed path, only deviate 200 feet at just the right moment, and clip an aircraft of ANY kind, which will be watching you on their TCAS. Not even a fucking Cesena 152. They aren't going to let you make multiple runs through the flight paths of the runways. They aren't going to let you hang out in the flight path. ATC would question any attempt to loiter in their airspace. It would be clear if a helicopter was hanging out, loitering, either in the flight path or anywhere else.
Not 1 in a million, literally fucking zero ability to plan anything like that.
And the same faggots that put this shit in your head also told you that the pilot was a tranny and pissed off at Trump over his trans issues for the military, right? Dumb faggot.
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 19:52:12 ago (+1/-0)*
The fact you lack the ability to even imagine a scenario were deliberately striking an aircraft coming in for landing isnt plannable, is peak npc.
Even as a thought exercise, that no-one could plan to hit an aircraft coming into land is simply implausible.
I'm not talking about ATC - not allowing loitering in their airspace - or any of that other associated stuff.
That you refuse to believe a terrorist or mental unstable individual, unlikely as it may be, wouldnt be able to target an aircraft coming into land in a helicopter is next level ignorant. And i'm also not suggesting that specific plane either- simply any plane coming into land (or take off). Hence why having so many incoming (outgoing) aircraft consistently using the airport makes a successful strike even more possible while ignoring any ATC directions after acknowledging them.
And the same faggots that put this shit in your head also told you that the pilot was a tranny and pissed off at Trump over his trans issues for the military, right? Dumb faggot.
Lol wut?.
Derp head, i'm not even claiming this incident was planned - im stating an objective truth of reality. Anything can be planned with enough time, resource, and luck.
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 9 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 12:17:04 ago (+9/-0)
https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1885354282234392671
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 6 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 14:58:16 ago (+6/-0)
This is unacceptable.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 17:34:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 14:36:18 ago (+2/-0)
Without loitering in an area, the odds of a Blackhawk striking an aircraft on final approach for runway 33 after sidestepping runway 1 on the request of ATC is ridiculously small. Certainly not plannable.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 17:38:29 ago (+0/-0)*
How likely is that - opposed to human error/ miscalculation/ pilot error and or negligence - is more the question.
Even just on the limited 5-8 min clips i've seen/ heard online there at least 5-7 other aircraft lined up to land and or taking off.
It would be as easy to purposely plan to T-bone another vehicle at a busy inner-city intersection.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -2 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 19:28:35 ago (+0/-2)
It's fairly obvious what happened. Human error causing plane accidents is fucking a common occurrence. Happens literally once or twice a month,
sometimes more. The ceiling for the flight path for that helicopter route is 200 AGL, which is low as fuck, and the Blackhawk got up to 400 agl, 200 feet higher than the ceiling, which is easy to do in something like a Blackhawk.
It is not easy to t-bone a plane doing 160 knots on approach, that's nearly 200 miles per hour. And, maybe you don't understand what the word loitering means. That helicopter was not hanging out just waiting for the right moment to try to hit an aircraft. It took off, flew exactly in the path it was supposed to fly, just 200 feet higher than allowed, and didn't speed up or slow down, at all, to adjust their impending trajectory.
Horizontal separation on aircraft on final approach is minimum 1 mile, except on parallel runways, where two aircraft landing of different runways can get closer to each other. It's not like you can just fly straight and steady from miles away and expect to hit a 100 foot target doing 200 mile an hour.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 1, 2025 17:25:59 ago (+1/-0)
It may well be accident, but conversely sure as shit it could also be planned you nonce.
Or are you actually saying no one could plan to strike a plane descending to land at 300-400 ft on final approach with a Blackhawk??, lmaoooooo
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 3 monthsFeb 1, 2025 23:43:18 ago (+0/-1)
And yes, I am exactly saying that there is no fucking way that you, or anyone else, could take a Blackhawk and smack it into a regional jet on approach to land without it being obvious to everyone that the Blackhawk was trying to hit that jet. No fucking way possible. And, you sure as hell could not take off and fly through the approach pattern with no deviation and expect to hit a jet. Again, no fucking way possible, not even once.
Get a fucking grip, you retarded fuckwit.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 01:37:11 ago (+1/-0)
Re-Watch the full audio/ flight map clip. you have 4 stacked for descent and landing - with one or two departing in that 8-9 minute clip.
Easily a dozen in 30 minutes if the flights are consistent.
and yet it did - and it was very obvious to all watching, that a wtf moment transpired.
You need to stop gripping, and loosen up - dipshit.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -2 points 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 09:28:36 ago (+0/-2)*
And yes, it did. In a tragedy that had no ability to planned and executed. Accidents caused by pilot error happen. It isn't plannable. Kill yourself, nigger.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 13:54:53 ago (+1/-0)
EDIT: That airport typically handles 62 flight an hour.
Looks like You're the nigger, pal.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -2 points 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 19:33:40 ago (+0/-2)
Unless the helicopter hangs out in the flight path of a runway, or tries to intercept a plane that they are actively tracking, there is zero, ABSOLUTELY ZERO FUCKING CHANCE, that you could plan to take off, fly an exactly prescribed path, only deviate 200 feet at just the right moment, and clip an aircraft of ANY kind, which will be watching you on their TCAS. Not even a fucking Cesena 152. They aren't going to let you make multiple runs through the flight paths of the runways. They aren't going to let you hang out in the flight path. ATC would question any attempt to loiter in their airspace. It would be clear if a helicopter was hanging out, loitering, either in the flight path or anywhere else.
Not 1 in a million, literally fucking zero ability to plan anything like that.
And the same faggots that put this shit in your head also told you that the pilot was a tranny and pissed off at Trump over his trans issues for the military, right? Dumb faggot.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 1 point 3 monthsFeb 2, 2025 19:52:12 ago (+1/-0)*
Even as a thought exercise, that no-one could plan to hit an aircraft coming into land is simply implausible.
I'm not talking about ATC - not allowing loitering in their airspace - or any of that other associated stuff.
That you refuse to believe a terrorist or mental unstable individual, unlikely as it may be, wouldnt be able to target an aircraft coming into land in a helicopter is next level ignorant. And i'm also not suggesting that specific plane either- simply any plane coming into land (or take off). Hence why having so many incoming (outgoing) aircraft consistently using the airport makes a successful strike even more possible while ignoring any ATC directions after acknowledging them.
Lol wut?.
Derp head, i'm not even claiming this incident was planned - im stating an objective truth of reality. Anything can be planned with enough time, resource, and luck.
[ + ] Ducktalesooo000ooo
[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 2 points 3 monthsJan 31, 2025 12:02:35 ago (+2/-0)