I came back from church yesterday and was moderately impressed by the pastor. For once a guest speaker actually was highlighting the hypocrisy of the church being guided by modern world morals, vs Biblical ones. But then he messed it all up by lumping "systemic racism" alongside all the other problems. It's like they take one step forward and two steps back.
This made me think to all those Christian (jews cosplaying) groups and how those groups have tried to normalize criminal activity as Godly. Smuggle humans and get them fake visas? God approved! Trying to stop your enemy from murdering you for existing? Well the law says no self defense, so die like a good goy. And people actually believe this shit and think this is normal.
Why bother to hold criminals to account. Just have God "judge" them, and continue doing fuck all! Way more convenient. There was a story years ago of that one idiot whose husband was murdered by a coon. Then the wife went on some speaking tour with the murderer. My guess is she was fucking the nigger or something. But still, how in the fuck is that Godly?! Forsake your husband by siding with the murderer.
401c3 churches. This is prophecy. If you wanted to, ask them how they develop their weekly sermon. Likely from a course by "Christian" authors with precious metals in their names
They all go to the same seminary schools (ironic since Jesus never mentioned pastoral college), all learn the same shit, all use the same Bibles, and all have to follow the same legal codified laws. A great example is mormonism in 1965. In the advent of the CRA, the mormon church just happened to decide to let niggers into their church. Apparently it was a "vision" at the time. It just happened to coincide with government edicts. And yet those pastors couldn't give up the sweet cash and traded money for morals. To me, the modern day church is an extension of the propaganda arm of the state.
All churches are horrible, I was listening to a pastor online whose takes are mostly based but he still denounced racism. However, it felt like he did it to keep his platform because he says races exist and they are different and should have their own nations. He’s also openly against feminism and homosexuality. He’s the most based pastor on a podcast I have come across. But they always denounce racism. They also have a token brown pastor (in the podcast). A couple of the regulars had been missionaries to Africa. And of course they love Thomas sowell clarence and declare him White and protestant
A lot of churches I visited, the congregants have this idea that self defense of any kind, for any reason is wrong. This has led to some spectacular pretzel logic when it comes to normal people vs Christians. This has also led to some catastrophic issues with those same Christians letting their entire neighborhood go to shit because they would rather appease to criminals than their own church members.
self defense of any kind, for any reason is wrong.
Smacking one of them in the face would crash their logic circuits. Would they hold up their hands to defend against another? Would they ban you to defend against a recurrence? That's just low IQ speaking. Zero possibility of self defence means you could literally own them as slaves if you wished.
the congregants have this idea that self defense of any kind, for any reason is wrong
A big thing to weed out is whether they are just presenting an opinion or whether they are claiming it is part of Christian doctrine.
For starters, it isn't part of Christian doctrine, and claiming otherwise is false.
We live in a strange time with many soft people. And by soft, I mean the type of hypocrites that would freely eat meat but not have the required nerve to kill a meat animal.
Or partake of crops but feel bad about killing pests that would destroy crops. To take freely from the fruits of the farmer's labour but hypocritically criticize the required actions of that labour.
This type of anti-action ideology is in the same category of belief that the fruits of society (law, order, peace, prosperity) ought exist but somehow without the prerequisite maintenance of functions necessary for sustaining society. This is including self-defense and proactively answering to the threat of adversarial forces.
A child asks why meat can't just magically appear on the dinner plate, and why a cow must die. It's childish. And so too is the wholesale rejection of self defense.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 09:11:42 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] BeholdTheLight
[ - ] BeholdTheLight [op] 3 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 09:14:29 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 14:40:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 10:19:12 ago (+2/-0)
All churches are horrible, I was listening to a pastor online whose takes are mostly based but he still denounced racism. However, it felt like he did it to keep his platform because he says races exist and they are different and should have their own nations. He’s also openly against feminism and homosexuality. He’s the most based pastor on a podcast I have come across. But they always denounce racism. They also have a token brown pastor (in the podcast). A couple of the regulars had been missionaries to Africa. And of course they love Thomas
sowellclarence and declare him White and protestant[ + ] BeholdTheLight
[ - ] BeholdTheLight [op] 3 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 10:44:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 14:46:36 ago (+0/-0)
Smacking one of them in the face would crash their logic circuits. Would they hold up their hands to defend against another? Would they ban you to defend against a recurrence? That's just low IQ speaking. Zero possibility of self defence means you could literally own them as slaves if you wished.
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 20:25:09 ago (+0/-0)
A big thing to weed out is whether they are just presenting an opinion or whether they are claiming it is part of Christian doctrine.
For starters, it isn't part of Christian doctrine, and claiming otherwise is false.
We live in a strange time with many soft people. And by soft, I mean the type of hypocrites that would freely eat meat but not have the required nerve to kill a meat animal.
Or partake of crops but feel bad about killing pests that would destroy crops. To take freely from the fruits of the farmer's labour but hypocritically criticize the required actions of that labour.
This type of anti-action ideology is in the same category of belief that the fruits of society (law, order, peace, prosperity) ought exist but somehow without the prerequisite maintenance of functions necessary for sustaining society. This is including self-defense and proactively answering to the threat of adversarial forces.
A child asks why meat can't just magically appear on the dinner plate, and why a cow must die. It's childish. And so too is the wholesale rejection of self defense.
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser -1 points 3 monthsJan 27, 2025 10:28:12 ago (+0/-1)