I've read Tilak's book, The Arctic Home Of The Vedas. It really is a game changer. He demonstrates how the Vedas explain an original homeland with 6 month long days and nights, then how the Vedic people slowly moved from place to place, describing the lands in detain, eventually invading India and driving the blacks to the south. Great book.
No, the Harappan culture was already there. They had writing and math and agriculture.
Indians descend from THREE different groups: 1. Black skinned south eurasian aboriginals, similar to andaman islanders or australian abos. 2. Early caucasian agriculturists from Iran who founded Harappan/Mohenjo Daro/Indus Valley civilization 3. Aryans from Russia with light hair and eyes, who were pastoralists. Spoke Indo-European language ancestral to Sanskrit, Hindi, Urdu, Farsi, etc., revered cows.
The two caucasian groups mixed with basically niggers. The upper castes like Brahmin have more caucasian ancestry. Low/no caste tribes like the Paniya and Irula have the most aboriginal ancestry.
Im not that knowlegeable. There are folks a lot more expert in this area than me. But thanks. Most of what Ive learned is from mainstream anthropology and archeogenetics. I don’t agree with all their conclusions, but they have discovered a lot of interesting evidence from genetic testing of ancient remains in the last couple of decades. Most of it does support “White supremacy” narratives, if you know what I mean. Brown people did not create all the marvels of ancient india (and there were quite a few). White people did and then they unfortunately mixed with abos and deteriorated genetically. The caste system is widely believed (among Indologists) to be an attempt to halt the race mixing, well after it had begun.
Many Indians (the ones who can read) are very angry about the mainstream explanation of Indian ethnogenesis. They reject the idea of Indo-European vedic culture and Sanskrit coming ultimately from Whites. The promote all kinds of pro-Indian narrative that you see a lot on Indo-European and anthropology forums. They are a major source of nuissance. But I think the genetic and archeological evidence are clear enough that most White and Jewish left wing academics support the notion of White Aryan origins at least in those fields.
Its interesting to note that R1a, the Y chromosomal haplogroup that is most common among Slavs is also the most common haplogroup in northern india. That haplogroup indicates patrilineal descent. R1a heatmap: https://files.catbox.moe/ow1f4k.png
I wanna write a book a fantasy realm. I’d explicitly make the characters all white then Hollywood would be so impressed they buy the rights to make a movie cause I’d sellout because I’m tired of being a wage slave and turn my main characters into niggers and make all the villains white men
Ethnic russians ( not some fucking Tuvan living near china in land acquired within the last 600 years by Russia) are barely distinguishable from a whole slew of other european ethnicities like French, Scottish, Dutch, Swiss, Austrian and so on. All those groups are heavily descended from Corded Ware Culture, a mix of Funnel Beaker people and Pontic Caspian Steppe Herders. Northern/Central Euros are CWC, including Russians and sintashta/aryans. Russians and Aryans are so far away from Mongols genetically its not even funny.
Khazaks and some other non-russian ethnicities in Russia have some chinky dna due to hunnic and mongol expansions. Those happened later than the Aryan period in central eurasia.
The ancestors of Russians were conquered by slavs, what were they speaking before that? In some cases, an indo-aryan language
Look at the chart showing FST distance of Androvno (proxy for aryan) to modern groups in the link. The closest related groups are Icelandic and Tajik. Mongols are very far away and not a match at all.
With Mongol and Hunnic invasions, you would expect to see alot of Y chromosomal haplogroup C, because those Asians were/are mostly C and they would be fucking everything in sight and making C babies. You don’t see any haplogroup C in the Russian ethnic group. Or in the Indians. You see haplogroup R1a which is probably from some closely related eastern european hunter gatherers who mixed with corded ware to form Androvno/Sintashta.
A much older admixture was Ancient North Eurasian, which may have picked up low levels of East Eurasian genetics when they lived in Siberia. That was 10 to 20 thousand years ago or more. Its not “Mongol” .
I would be very cautious about trusting genetic data published post jew capture of scientific institutions. It is clear that slavs have a close relationship that is distinct from aryans (german/british/nordic). Obviously there is overlap, but obviously there is also commonality in bahaviour and other traits that is common amung them but not between them.
I am a slav, but consider the aryans a superior genetic strain based on the qualities I see expressed in them and their societies. I am not interested in coping with some inferiority complex by lying about reality, that only hurts me more in the end. I want to do everything possible to improve the genetic quality of my people.
I believe both groups are served by coming together as white people to fend off the common enemies. And it is clear to me that there is a kike effort to slander the genetic heritage of aryans by claiming they are iranian, amung other things. I believe the conflating of slavic and aryan is part of that.
All humans share most of our genes, that is not a valid argument against races or ethnicities being different or existing. The distinction between aryans and slavs exists in the meaningful differences and can not be denied by pointing to the similarities.
It is clear that slavs have a close relationship that is distinct from aryans (german/british/nordic).
That is not what I mean by Aryan. The Aryans were tribes from russia/central asian steppe who eventually invaded India and Iran and spread their language and genetics to those places. They were white and they were largely derived from corded ware culture, as were slavs and germans/scandinavians and celt and italic tribes.
Early anthropologist connected the Aryan culture in India and Iran to other early indo-european groups and Aryan became a by-word for early indo-european. But its not used correctly. Scandinavian/Germanic tribes never called themselves Aryan. Only some White Indo-European tribes who expanded eastward into Asia did.
The formation of the modern White race is largely coincident with the development of Corded Ware Culture. Slavs and Germanics and Celts all came from that group for the most part or at least groups closely related to it.
If the Germanics are a better breed, it may be because of selection events that happened after Corded Ware Culture broke up.
If the Germanics are a better breed, it may be because of selection events that happened after Corded Ware Culture broke up.
It seems what we have is a confusion of terms. What Aryan is to me, and I bet almoat everyone else, is what Hitler called his people. Specifically using that term to include non germanic people that were closely related to germanic people.
I appreciate that this may be etymologically wrong, but in the context of this website I think it is in keeping with the common understanding of the definition of Aryan.
Hitler was using a term that social scientists were using in the day. At that time we did not know as much about our evolution as the European race. We now know that the Aryan tribes ( people who actually called themselves aryans) share common ancestry with germanics, slavs, greeks, etc in the Pontic Caspian Steppe Herder people, often now referred to as proto-indo-europeans (although that is correctly just a linguistic category) or Yamnaya/Yamna people ( a genetic population of steppe herders). I think steppe herder or PIE is a better term for what most people around here mean when they say Aryan.
But northern europeans aren’t directly descended from steppe herders, they are descended from the people of Corded Ware Culture, whic was a mix of steppe herders and some other people living in situ in northern europe, mostly funnel beaker culture. Greeks and armenians do not descend from this group. But slavs, germanics, celts, latins, and aryans were.
The group that you are using Aryan to refer to seems to me to be just germanics: germans, dutch, scandinavians, englishman, etc., hold the slavs/celts/italics/indo-iranians. Thats fine. I know how most people use the term. I just like to let people know what terms are used now in academia and what we’ve learned since Hitlers day. I believe Hitler would have been in favor of using up to date terms. Theyre not jewed imo, and they let people know that youve done your research.
Interestingly the slavs like russians and poles have more ancestry from steppe herder/Yamnaya populations than germanics, even the scandis. Germanics have anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry which makes them closer to south Europe. So the differences between groups is due to more than one group having more of “the good stuff” than the other.
[ - ] canbot 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 16:39:32 ago (+1/-0)
I would be very cautious about trusting genetic data published post jew capture of scientific institutions. It is clear that slavs have a close relationship that is distinct from aryans (german/british/nordic). Obviously there is overlap, but obviously there is also commonality in bahaviour and other traits that is common amung them but not between them.
I am a slav, but consider the aryans a superior genetic strain based on the qualities I see expressed in them and their societies. I am not interested in coping with some inferiority complex by lying about reality, that only hurts me more in the end. I want to do everything possible to improve the genetic quality of my people.
I believe both groups are served by coming together as white people to fend off the common enemies. And it is clear to me that there is a kike effort to slander the genetic heritage of aryans by claiming they are iranian, amung other things. I believe the conflating of slavic and aryan is part of that.
All humans share most of our genes, that is not a valid argument against races or ethnicities being different or existing. The distinction between aryans and slavs exists in the meaningful differences and can not be denied by pointing to the similarities.
I know youre mentally handicapped. No Im not going to recap the discussion in a more retard friendly version for you. Ask your carer to explain this comment. 🤤
the tl;dr ultimately is that the skinhead doesnt know he worships the street shitter.
aryans were the sanskrit writing people that wrote shit like the rigvedas, the holy stories of the street shitter, then went west and became mongols, then iranians (land of the aryans), then started mixing with what was already around the middle east and mediterranean.
i mean you go and spit in a tube and give it to 23 and me or any number of jewish dna testing companies and theyll throw in 'oh and by the way....' retarded hardcore white nationalist skinheads do exactly the same thing in the other direction. even pagan retards are smarter than that, at least them thor worshipping speds know and admit to their ancestry, nazis are clueless as fuck and when they find out go absolutely fucking apeshit.
The Aryans were White and I believe racially similar to Russians. Ultimately they were a spin off of corded ware culture, which is where most of European ancestry is from. I wouldn’t say skinheads worship streetshitters. But the Aryans eventually mixed with street shitters (in india) and other swarthy crap (in Iran) and so their are no White people left to represent their culture. Theoretically some russians must have aryan ancestry. But the languages of Iran and India and Pakistan where originally spoken by Whites and the Vedic religion was mostly based on White Aryan paganism. The Brahmins were originally White.
The mongols were not aryan. The Huns/Xiongnu were racially mixed: more chinky in the east and more European in the west. But they came later after the founding of vedic culture and the Medes.
I just think maybe Aryan is not the best name for our ancient White ancestry or steppe herder related ancestry. It relates to a specific sub-group of steppe herder ancestry. The Celts and the Germanics did not come from Aryans. Early 20th century anthropologists had not filled in all the holes of the timeline that are known today.
You call me a troon. You call GWI a troon. You don’t believe either of us are troons. You just like to spread lies and confusion intentionally, just like a kike. Youre a dysgenic White and your presence weakens and pollutes this forum.
virtue signaling
I have principles. This must seem totally alien to you. Go back to your circle jerk on jitsi or wherever. You can not be allowed to decide who uses this forum.
Oh I believe you both are indeed troons. I mainly dont like him because he promotes miscegenation by calling “race purists” kikes to cope with race mixing with his rice nigger. There was also that time he screeched in jitsi about raping his children, but im sure he will deny all of this and lie. Just the type of guy he is, the same type of troon you are.
You just like to spread lies and confusion intentionally, just like a kike.
🤣 Tell me what I've lied about. Just one. @love240 remembers all of those lies you were telling about me though. Principles! So by your own logic, are you calling yourself a kike?
Honestly though I'm doing it for the lulz and to watch all of you bitches whine about it. The amount of milk I have squeezed from you lolcows is amazin'
Bro India is like the dirtiest group of people. They might be the dirtiest group of people on the planet. There’s some competition but I feel like on the whole they take the cake. India is one of the only countries that when people who visited talk about it they hated it. It seems most people who visit it hate it.
Subsaharan africans and abos are worse. But they never built a civilization because they had no white ancestry. India had enough white ancestry to build cities and schools and farm and trade. But the lower classes have so much shitskin ancestry they crap in the streets, don’t clean up after themselves. Honestly if they got rid of the lower castes it would not be that bad.
Not aryans. You are using the wrong word. Maybe you mean pontic caspian steppe herders or ancient north eurasians? Youre still wrong if so, but less wrong. Ghengis Khan might have had some ANE ancestry. The Buddha was almost certainly heavily Aryan.
You don’t know what an aryan is. Aryan was a term used by tribes in central and south asia to identify themselves. The word exists in Indian and Persian languages and no where else, up until European anthropologists started studying those languages 200 years ago.
The word was applied to all people of steppe herder ancestry, incorrectly. The Aryans didn’t exist until the bronze age which started 4000 years ago.
Theres no such thing as atlanteans. Whites who survived the Ice Age in the Caucasus refugium are called Caucasus hunter gatherers. Steppe herders and by extension Aryans have some Caucasus Hunter Gatherer ancestry but more importantly they also have Western Hunter Gatherer and Ancient North Eurasian ancestry (by way of Eastern European Hunter Gatherer) which sets them (and us) apart from middle easterners who also have a lot of Caucasus ancestry (more than us.)
Jesus you’re dumb. You should read more lol. Indo Europeans conquered northern India and instituted their caste system. Thats where their Brahmin got their European dna.
And that has nothing to do with Iranians dipshit lol.
You are mostly right. The aryans came from Sintashta culture which branched off from Corded Ware people (probably) who were probably speaking some proto-celto-germano-italo-balto-slavo-indo-iranian language. (Greek and armenian had already split off) I believe Sintashta/aryans also founded the Persian/Mede culture in Iran which is why their language is so similar to north Indian languages like Hindi. Not sure how strong the genetic contribution of the Aryans was in Iran. Of course a lot of northern Indians have R1a Y-chromosomes which is a pretty good indication of strong Aryan contribution there. Not so much in Iran though. But that could be due to later invasions from islamic middle-easterners, displacing Aryan paternal lineages. I dont know.
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 3 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 11:42:56 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs [op] 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 11:47:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 00:03:24 ago (+5/-2)
Indians descend from THREE different groups:
1. Black skinned south eurasian aboriginals, similar to andaman islanders or australian abos.
2. Early caucasian agriculturists from Iran who founded Harappan/Mohenjo Daro/Indus Valley civilization
3. Aryans from Russia with light hair and eyes, who were pastoralists. Spoke Indo-European language ancestral to Sanskrit, Hindi, Urdu, Farsi, etc., revered cows.
The two caucasian groups mixed with basically niggers. The upper castes like Brahmin have more caucasian ancestry. Low/no caste tribes like the Paniya and Irula have the most aboriginal ancestry.
[ + ] foxtrot45
[ - ] foxtrot45 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 05:52:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:22:51 ago (+3/-1)
Many Indians (the ones who can read) are very angry about the mainstream explanation of Indian ethnogenesis. They reject the idea of Indo-European vedic culture and Sanskrit coming ultimately from Whites. The promote all kinds of pro-Indian narrative that you see a lot on Indo-European and anthropology forums. They are a major source of nuissance. But I think the genetic and archeological evidence are clear enough that most White and Jewish left wing academics support the notion of White Aryan origins at least in those fields.
Its interesting to note that R1a, the Y chromosomal haplogroup that is most common among Slavs is also the most common haplogroup in northern india. That haplogroup indicates patrilineal descent. R1a heatmap: https://files.catbox.moe/ow1f4k.png
[ + ] GreenSaint
[ - ] GreenSaint 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 07:01:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:24:09 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 14:06:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 15:07:00 ago (+0/-1)
Khazaks and some other non-russian ethnicities in Russia have some chinky dna due to hunnic and mongol expansions. Those happened later than the Aryan period in central eurasia.
The ancestors of Russians were conquered by slavs, what were they speaking before that? In some cases, an indo-aryan language
https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1569275134153994241
Look at the chart showing FST distance of Androvno (proxy for aryan) to modern groups in the link. The closest related groups are Icelandic and Tajik. Mongols are very far away and not a match at all.
With Mongol and Hunnic invasions, you would expect to see alot of Y chromosomal haplogroup C, because those Asians were/are mostly C and they would be fucking everything in sight and making C babies. You don’t see any haplogroup C in the Russian ethnic group. Or in the Indians. You see haplogroup R1a which is probably from some closely related eastern european hunter gatherers who mixed with corded ware to form Androvno/Sintashta.
A much older admixture was Ancient North Eurasian, which may have picked up low levels of East Eurasian genetics when they lived in Siberia. That was 10 to 20 thousand years ago or more. Its not “Mongol” .
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 17:16:54 ago (+2/-0)
I am a slav, but consider the aryans a superior genetic strain based on the qualities I see expressed in them and their societies. I am not interested in coping with some inferiority complex by lying about reality, that only hurts me more in the end. I want to do everything possible to improve the genetic quality of my people.
I believe both groups are served by coming together as white people to fend off the common enemies. And it is clear to me that there is a kike effort to slander the genetic heritage of aryans by claiming they are iranian, amung other things. I believe the conflating of slavic and aryan is part of that.
All humans share most of our genes, that is not a valid argument against races or ethnicities being different or existing. The distinction between aryans and slavs exists in the meaningful differences and can not be denied by pointing to the similarities.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 18:39:26 ago (+1/-1)
That is not what I mean by Aryan. The Aryans were tribes from russia/central asian steppe who eventually invaded India and Iran and spread their language and genetics to those places. They were white and they were largely derived from corded ware culture, as were slavs and germans/scandinavians and celt and italic tribes.
Early anthropologist connected the Aryan culture in India and Iran to other early indo-european groups and Aryan became a by-word for early indo-european. But its not used correctly. Scandinavian/Germanic tribes never called themselves Aryan. Only some White Indo-European tribes who expanded eastward into Asia did.
The formation of the modern White race is largely coincident with the development of Corded Ware Culture. Slavs and Germanics and Celts all came from that group for the most part or at least groups closely related to it.
If the Germanics are a better breed, it may be because of selection events that happened after Corded Ware Culture broke up.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 0 points 5 monthsJan 17, 2025 04:35:34 ago (+0/-0)*
It seems what we have is a confusion of terms. What Aryan is to me, and I bet almoat everyone else, is what Hitler called his people. Specifically using that term to include non germanic people that were closely related to germanic people.
I appreciate that this may be etymologically wrong, but in the context of this website I think it is in keeping with the common understanding of the definition of Aryan.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 5 monthsJan 17, 2025 12:02:59 ago (+0/-1)
But northern europeans aren’t directly descended from steppe herders, they are descended from the people of Corded Ware Culture, whic was a mix of steppe herders and some other people living in situ in northern europe, mostly funnel beaker culture. Greeks and armenians do not descend from this group. But slavs, germanics, celts, latins, and aryans were.
The group that you are using Aryan to refer to seems to me to be just germanics: germans, dutch, scandinavians, englishman, etc., hold the slavs/celts/italics/indo-iranians. Thats fine. I know how most people use the term. I just like to let people know what terms are used now in academia and what we’ve learned since Hitlers day. I believe Hitler would have been in favor of using up to date terms. Theyre not jewed imo, and they let people know that youve done your research.
Interestingly the slavs like russians and poles have more ancestry from steppe herder/Yamnaya populations than germanics, even the scandis. Germanics have anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry which makes them closer to south Europe. So the differences between groups is due to more than one group having more of “the good stuff” than the other.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 16:39:32 ago (+1/-0)
I am a slav, but consider the aryans a superior genetic strain based on the qualities I see expressed in them and their societies. I am not interested in coping with some inferiority complex by lying about reality, that only hurts me more in the end. I want to do everything possible to improve the genetic quality of my people.
I believe both groups are served by coming together as white people to fend off the common enemies. And it is clear to me that there is a kike effort to slander the genetic heritage of aryans by claiming they are iranian, amung other things. I believe the conflating of slavic and aryan is part of that.
All humans share most of our genes, that is not a valid argument against races or ethnicities being different or existing. The distinction between aryans and slavs exists in the meaningful differences and can not be denied by pointing to the similarities.
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 00:04:44 ago (+3/-3)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 00:13:41 ago (+4/-2)
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 01:58:22 ago (+2/-0)
aryans were the sanskrit writing people that wrote shit like the rigvedas, the holy stories of the street shitter, then went west and became mongols, then iranians (land of the aryans), then started mixing with what was already around the middle east and mediterranean.
i mean you go and spit in a tube and give it to 23 and me or any number of jewish dna testing companies and theyll throw in 'oh and by the way....' retarded hardcore white nationalist skinheads do exactly the same thing in the other direction. even pagan retards are smarter than that, at least them thor worshipping speds know and admit to their ancestry, nazis are clueless as fuck and when they find out go absolutely fucking apeshit.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:02:31 ago (+2/-1)
The mongols were not aryan. The Huns/Xiongnu were racially mixed: more chinky in the east and more European in the west. But they came later after the founding of vedic culture and the Medes.
I just think maybe Aryan is not the best name for our ancient White ancestry or steppe herder related ancestry. It relates to a specific sub-group of steppe herder ancestry. The Celts and the Germanics did not come from Aryans. Early 20th century anthropologists had not filled in all the holes of the timeline that are known today.
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 00:15:43 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 08:38:24 ago (+2/-2)
Why are you trying to brigade bushcuck5000?
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:12:42 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:30:20 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:47:37 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 10:06:37 ago (+2/-2)
You call me a troon. You call GWI a troon. You don’t believe either of us are troons. You just like to spread lies and confusion intentionally, just like a kike. Youre a dysgenic White and your presence weakens and pollutes this forum.
I have principles. This must seem totally alien to you. Go back to your circle jerk on jitsi or wherever. You can not be allowed to decide who uses this forum.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 10:13:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy -1 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 10:13:48 ago (+1/-2)*
🤣 Tell me what I've lied about. Just one. @love240 remembers all of those lies you were telling about me though. Principles! So by your own logic, are you calling yourself a kike?
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 10:03:05 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 03:26:24 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] GreenSaint
[ - ] GreenSaint 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 06:59:06 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:29:06 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 2 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 01:19:51 ago (+2/-0)
But the local populations of shitskins breed us out.
Then took credit for ghenghis khan to buddha to indus valley and ancient egypt.
And now they are even taking recent white heroes as their own.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:36:42 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 17:03:11 ago (+1/-0)
Ayrans are the survivors of the great deluges 12k years ago.
Probably atlanteans.
Whites who survived in the caucasus mountains and spread out.
Stop spouting judeo-nigger bullshit you heard in a judeo-satanist school
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 17:19:53 ago (+0/-1)
The word was applied to all people of steppe herder ancestry, incorrectly. The Aryans didn’t exist until the bronze age which started 4000 years ago.
Theres no such thing as atlanteans. Whites who survived the Ice Age in the Caucasus refugium are called Caucasus hunter gatherers. Steppe herders and by extension Aryans have some Caucasus Hunter Gatherer ancestry but more importantly they also have Western Hunter Gatherer and Ancient North Eurasian ancestry (by way of Eastern European Hunter Gatherer) which sets them (and us) apart from middle easterners who also have a lot of Caucasus ancestry (more than us.)
You don’t know what youre talking about.
[ + ] Smedleys_Butler
[ - ] Smedleys_Butler 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 07:35:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 5 monthsJan 15, 2025 23:37:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ducktalesooo000ooo
[ - ] Ducktalesooo000ooo 2 points 5 monthsJan 15, 2025 23:44:02 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 01:55:49 ago (+1/-1)
Indians were the aryans asshat. Thats why all their ancient holy books are written in Sanskrit. The language of the Aryans.
Iranians are also aryan. Iran is literally 'The land of the Aryans'
cant help history.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs [op] 3 points 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 02:10:46 ago (+3/-0)
Indo Europeans conquered northern India and instituted their caste system.
Thats where their Brahmin got their European dna.
And that has nothing to do with Iranians dipshit lol.
Try reading the content you’re commenting on.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 5 monthsJan 16, 2025 09:55:53 ago (+2/-1)*