David Icke and Alex Jones both refused to acknowledge the jews for 20+ years, wittingly or not.
Icke finally said it in his book about 911. Albeit he realizes half of the zionist and globalists are not even jewish. Which is an important problem to solve.
And an important point almost everyone here misses.
I think that's why Icke literally started getting banned from countries. He called out the jews. Literally.
Speaks volumes.
Yesterday he even talked shit about Alex Jones on twitterx for being an Elon bitch.
Icke ain't a genius but he's somebody who can be counted on to tell his version of the truth.
Zionism has some appeal outside of the "chosen". Many Christians are fooled into thinking supporting kikes will get them brownie points with God. Some Christians are convinced Israel brings is closer to the apocalypse and thus rapture. There's also lots of profiteering opportunities.
It's not surprising that many zionists are not kikes. Which is why we need robust systems that punish the nepotism and corruption that allows zionists to flourish.
a) Before one can appeal (want) or refuse (not want) a suggestion...there's a perceivable need. Hunger moves through one before a choice can be made to appeal or refuse food. A jew suggests food to distracts gentiles from hunger, hence making food more or less appealing to choose from.
b) There's no -ism outside of the "chosen", because nature doesn't shape -isms. It's few within who shape -isms to tempt consent by many, hence tempting ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion.
Many Christians
Christian/christ - "anointed one" implies each one coming into being through the birth-channel, hence a separation of each off-spring. A jew suggests abrahamism aka ab (father) raham/ruham (multitude) to tempt many gentiles together.
In other words...joining Christianity contradicts Christ (being anointed aka being set apart from one another). The jewish trick is always inversion...hence artificially collectivizing together that which nature sets apart.
will get them brownie points with God
Free WILL of choice implies ones response-ability within origin (God)...getting brownie points implies chancing ones choice on suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin. Another jewish inversion.
Some Christians are convinced
Con (together) vincere (to conquer) contradicts Christ (being set apart from one another)...hence only "some" being convinced, while others become discouraged. The resulting conflict (conviction vs discouragement) is what one side is trying to conquer, which the other side is protecting itself from.
This conflict is called "reason" and a jew utilizes talmudic reasoning to contradict both sides, as to fuel the conflict among gentiles.
Israel brings is closer to the apocalypse
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies resisting the temptation of outcome (suggestion), while adapting to origin (perception)...doing that implies apocalypse aka revelation aka disclosure of all perceivable through each ones perception.
Any Christian who "joined" suggested Christianity conceals self from being revealed by nature as Christ. A jew suggests the fictitious words (christ/christian/christianity) to distract consenting gentiles from how nature works.
profiteering opportunities.
Hence prophets/profits taking the opportunity to tempt others to pay consent to suggestions offered. The price of paying? Selling oneself out to another!
zionists are not kikes
A jew suggests the -ism to tempt consenting gentiles into reasoning against each other aka into CIRCULAR logic, hence kike/kikel - "circle".
[ + ] Master_B
[ - ] Master_B 2 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 06:21:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 4 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 03:47:56 ago (+4/-0)*
Icke finally said it in his book about 911. Albeit he realizes half of the zionist and globalists are not even jewish. Which is an important problem to solve.
And an important point almost everyone here misses.
I think that's why Icke literally started getting banned from countries. He called out the jews. Literally.
Speaks volumes.
Yesterday he even talked shit about Alex Jones on twitterx for being an Elon bitch.
Icke ain't a genius but he's somebody who can be counted on to tell his version of the truth.
He's been banned decades before banning was cool.
This is the first guy I've ever seen canceled
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 5 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 06:53:50 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 2 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 06:56:41 ago (+2/-0)
A jew suggests the -ism (zionism; globalism) to tempt each consenting gentile to become an -ist (zionist; globalist)...that's why "half".
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 10:58:28 ago (+2/-0)
It's not surprising that many zionists are not kikes. Which is why we need robust systems that punish the nepotism and corruption that allows zionists to flourish.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 3 monthsJan 1, 2025 12:29:40 ago (+0/-1)
a) Before one can appeal (want) or refuse (not want) a suggestion...there's a perceivable need. Hunger moves through one before a choice can be made to appeal or refuse food. A jew suggests food to distracts gentiles from hunger, hence making food more or less appealing to choose from.
b) There's no -ism outside of the "chosen", because nature doesn't shape -isms. It's few within who shape -isms to tempt consent by many, hence tempting ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion.
Christian/christ - "anointed one" implies each one coming into being through the birth-channel, hence a separation of each off-spring. A jew suggests abrahamism aka ab (father) raham/ruham (multitude) to tempt many gentiles together.
In other words...joining Christianity contradicts Christ (being anointed aka being set apart from one another). The jewish trick is always inversion...hence artificially collectivizing together that which nature sets apart.
Free WILL of choice implies ones response-ability within origin (God)...getting brownie points implies chancing ones choice on suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin. Another jewish inversion.
Con (together) vincere (to conquer) contradicts Christ (being set apart from one another)...hence only "some" being convinced, while others become discouraged. The resulting conflict (conviction vs discouragement) is what one side is trying to conquer, which the other side is protecting itself from.
This conflict is called "reason" and a jew utilizes talmudic reasoning to contradict both sides, as to fuel the conflict among gentiles.
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies resisting the temptation of outcome (suggestion), while adapting to origin (perception)...doing that implies apocalypse aka revelation aka disclosure of all perceivable through each ones perception.
Any Christian who "joined" suggested Christianity conceals self from being revealed by nature as Christ. A jew suggests the fictitious words (christ/christian/christianity) to distract consenting gentiles from how nature works.
Hence prophets/profits taking the opportunity to tempt others to pay consent to suggestions offered. The price of paying? Selling oneself out to another!
A jew suggests the -ism to tempt consenting gentiles into reasoning against each other aka into CIRCULAR logic, hence kike/kikel - "circle".