Back in the 70s the pitch was: Mandatory car insurance will force everybody to be covered thus eliminating uninsured motorists and lowering the cost of coverage. That was a lie. Car insurance doubled. Then came: Mandatory seat belts will save more lives and lower the cost of coverage. It's true that seatbelts save lives and reduce injury to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars yearly, but after the law was passed, car insurance doubled. So that was another lie.
They pitched it to sound like they love you and don't want to see you get hurt, but local cops killed a nigger who bolted when they tried to pull him over for not wearing one. Forced him off the road and ran him over when he tried to run. So that is a lie, too.
Mandatory car insurance is tyranny. Nowadays, if you don't pay your insurance for a month or two, they suspend your license and nullify your car tag. A license reinstatement is over $200, getting insurance costs over $200 to start it, and the car tag is $100 or more. More than $500 in penalties for not being able to pay your mandatory $100/month to the mafia.
AND you can't drive to do those things that are necessary, like getting to work to pay those fuckers their money. If you do and the pigs catch you, well there's some more money down the drain paying off tickets and bail.
Try to volunteer for a fire brigade to learn that scooping up the brains of yet another seatbelt refusenik hurts a lot...especially if it's a child catapulted from the backseat.
As for fines...those are just racketeering by few, while tempting many to either bind themselves willingly or refuse to do so, which in return justifies the fines.
Only nature reFINEs those who resist temptation...
Stupid does hurt. Unfortunately, the collateral damage is almost always worse than the self inflicted. Stupid people make shit harder for everyone around them, and they're too stupid to realize that they're not just stupid but also selfish.
Stupid/stupor/stop - "cessation of motion"...there can be no cessation of motion for resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death), which btw is measured in Hz aka hertz/hurts.
A jew tempts gentiles to call each other "stupid", hence wasting resistance by hurting (Hz) each other. It's a linguistic deception.
safety...survival
Life cannot be saved, hence living (temporary growth) within process of dying (ongoing loss). A jew suggests survivalism to tempt consenting gentiles to believe in salvation and saviors. The trick...holding out for outcome tempts one to ignore resisting origin.
statist
-ist (statist) implies ones consent to -ism (statism). Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto something, while ignoring ones STATE of being (life) moved (inception towards death). A jew suggests statements to tempt the consenting minds of gentiles to hold onto the suggested aka to affix within mind/memory, which brings me back to stupid (cessation of motion) aka exploiting gentile ignorance of being moved as a self imposes cessation of thinking; adapting and thereby sustaining self.
species we see today
Species implies special aka specified/differentiation/separated aka each one apart from one another. A jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt consenting gentiles together, hence amassing the unwashed masses.
Seeing implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence ones sight within a moving differentiation of partials. Looking at something a jew suggests, narrows ones sight to the suggested. Therefore...one ain't seeing much, while holding something in sight.
And about half the traffic fatalities are wearing seat belts - what is the excuse then?
If first responders don't like scooping up brains - LEARN TO CODE!!!! LMAO.
Nobody is forced to be a first responder. Unfortunately, all these seat belt laws - especially the primary seat belt laws - were passed because the crybaby first responders lied and said they had PTSD from all the fatal accidents. Seat belts or not there will be fatal accidents.
As a Libertarian, I'm ashamed to admit my hypocracy. I'm somewhat OK with laws that single out stupid people.
The people in jail for smoking pot aren't exactly geniuses. I'll look the other way if you can lower the cost of keeping them out of White Civilization.
My humble opinion, when the state pays for healthcare, like in Canada (or most of the developed world), the fines are justified as it encourages more people to wear seatbelts and thus reduces injuries and thus reduces healthcare costs. If someone really doesn't want to wear a seatbelt, then allow them to opt out of tax payer funded healthcare incase of an accident. I'm sure someone smarter in this subject matter will be able to educate me on the flaws of my opinion.
Shouldn't we do the same for people who go outside? Sun is damaging to the skin and increases skin cancer, so why should everyone else carry the increased burder of their poor health choices?
How about fat people? They should definitely be opted out of any health coverages. Again, why are we paying for their increased health costs?
Or how about children with incurable diseases? First of all, they aren't even paying taxes, which should be enough of a good reason to stop their treatments by itself.
Then of course we have to remove coverage from anyone who plays sports. Sports are proven to increase your odds of injuries. Why would we as a society cover the costs of their personal choices?
Blue eyes are more likely to have problems. We should also make it so blue eyed people have to wear mandatory protective goggles to reduce their risks, otherwise we suspend their coverages as well. We can have the police do warrantless safety checks where they set up at the bottom of your stairs and you have to present mandatory federal eye-protection identification to get into your kitchen.
At what point is the argument just that universal healthcare is stupid and everyone should just have.... personal responsibility for themselves? Why do I pay taxes to give heart surgery to 400lb diabetics?
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 4 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 15:45:32 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Bassman9000
[ - ] Bassman9000 4 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 17:05:43 ago (+4/-0)
Gives them "probable cause" to "check" a person breaking no laws.
Many crimes have been found after a seatbelt traffic stop.
"Is that Marijuana I smell?" Please step out of the vehicle.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 3 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 17:07:45 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] oyveyo
[ - ] oyveyo 4 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 13:35:21 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 18:41:09 ago (+2/-0)
It was the start of the control by fear. Crash test dummy slaughters. Gruesome stories in women's magazines about mangled bodies.
"Your children belong to me. I'm a controlling liberal bitch jealous of mothers. I vote left and I vote for suffocation by my husband the government".
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 2 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 15:46:50 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Puller_of_Noses
[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 2 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 14:37:34 ago (+2/-0)*
That was a lie.
Car insurance doubled.
Then came: Mandatory seat belts will save more lives and lower the cost of coverage.
It's true that seatbelts save lives and reduce injury to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars yearly, but after the law was passed, car insurance doubled.
So that was another lie.
They pitched it to sound like they love you and don't want to see you get hurt, but local cops killed a nigger who bolted when they tried to pull him over for not wearing one. Forced him off the road and ran him over when he tried to run. So that is a lie, too.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 3 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 17:09:44 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] oyveyo
[ - ] oyveyo 0 points 4 monthsDec 18, 2024 04:29:56 ago (+0/-0)*
AND you can't drive to do those things that are necessary, like getting to work to pay those fuckers their money. If you do and the pigs catch you, well there's some more money down the drain paying off tickets and bail.
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 4 monthsDec 18, 2024 19:45:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 13:41:53 ago (+1/-0)
As for fines...those are just racketeering by few, while tempting many to either bind themselves willingly or refuse to do so, which in return justifies the fines.
Only nature reFINEs those who resist temptation...
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 14:53:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 15:35:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 20:00:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 16:03:23 ago (+0/-0)
Stupid/stupor/stop - "cessation of motion"...there can be no cessation of motion for resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death), which btw is measured in Hz aka hertz/hurts.
A jew tempts gentiles to call each other "stupid", hence wasting resistance by hurting (Hz) each other. It's a linguistic deception.
Life cannot be saved, hence living (temporary growth) within process of dying (ongoing loss). A jew suggests survivalism to tempt consenting gentiles to believe in salvation and saviors. The trick...holding out for outcome tempts one to ignore resisting origin.
-ist (statist) implies ones consent to -ism (statism). Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto something, while ignoring ones STATE of being (life) moved (inception towards death). A jew suggests statements to tempt the consenting minds of gentiles to hold onto the suggested aka to affix within mind/memory, which brings me back to stupid (cessation of motion) aka exploiting gentile ignorance of being moved as a self imposes cessation of thinking; adapting and thereby sustaining self.
Species implies special aka specified/differentiation/separated aka each one apart from one another. A jew suggests pluralism (we) to tempt consenting gentiles together, hence amassing the unwashed masses.
Seeing implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence ones sight within a moving differentiation of partials. Looking at something a jew suggests, narrows ones sight to the suggested. Therefore...one ain't seeing much, while holding something in sight.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 19:57:06 ago (+0/-0)
If first responders don't like scooping up brains - LEARN TO CODE!!!! LMAO.
Nobody is forced to be a first responder. Unfortunately, all these seat belt laws - especially the primary seat belt laws - were passed because the crybaby first responders lied and said they had PTSD from all the fatal accidents. Seat belts or not there will be fatal accidents.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 18:54:56 ago (+0/-0)
I'm somewhat OK with laws that single out stupid people.
The people in jail for smoking pot aren't exactly geniuses.
I'll look the other way if you can lower the cost of keeping them out of White Civilization.
[ + ] germ22
[ - ] germ22 0 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 16:23:06 ago (+0/-0)
If someone really doesn't want to wear a seatbelt, then allow them to opt out of tax payer funded healthcare incase of an accident.
I'm sure someone smarter in this subject matter will be able to educate me on the flaws of my opinion.
[ + ] Whatthefuck
[ - ] Whatthefuck 0 points 4 monthsDec 18, 2024 08:42:46 ago (+0/-0)
How about fat people? They should definitely be opted out of any health coverages. Again, why are we paying for their increased health costs?
Or how about children with incurable diseases? First of all, they aren't even paying taxes, which should be enough of a good reason to stop their treatments by itself.
Then of course we have to remove coverage from anyone who plays sports. Sports are proven to increase your odds of injuries. Why would we as a society cover the costs of their personal choices?
Blue eyes are more likely to have problems. We should also make it so blue eyed people have to wear mandatory protective goggles to reduce their risks, otherwise we suspend their coverages as well. We can have the police do warrantless safety checks where they set up at the bottom of your stairs and you have to present mandatory federal eye-protection identification to get into your kitchen.
At what point is the argument just that universal healthcare is stupid and everyone should just have.... personal responsibility for themselves? Why do I pay taxes to give heart surgery to 400lb diabetics?
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander -1 points 4 monthsDec 18, 2024 19:48:04 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] germ22
[ - ] germ22 -1 points 4 monthsDec 18, 2024 20:19:25 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander -1 points 4 monthsDec 19, 2024 06:04:01 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger -2 points 4 monthsDec 17, 2024 19:34:15 ago (+0/-2)