Sign into an existing account

I believe this graphic is showing the predicted mean average IQ (based on a sample) and the confidence interval (probably 95%) of that mean. That indicates that they are 95% confident that the mean average is somewhere on that yellow line.

The yellow line does not show the IQ distribution around that mean. It is not trying to show where individuals of a given race fall relative to the mean. Im not sure that is obvious to everyone.

So groups with long lines are groups for which the researchers have low confidence in their predicted mean. Because there are few subjects in the “korean and japanese” group, they dont really know where the mean average IQ is for them. It could be as low as 106. American nigger and white IQ predicted means are high confidence— lots of subjects in those samples. Whites show as 104. Thats pretty good. (It probably includes kikes btw. )


There is a phenomenon where immigrants tend to be higher IQ than the average of their native ethnicity. I can’t remember what the term is for that. But it makes sense. Smarter people tend to have the wherewithal to tackle the stresses and complexities of adapting to a new culture. Why do I mention this? Because Korean immigrants to the US are not the average Korean. They tend to be special, privileged , and smarter. Their descendents will theoretically trend back towards the mean of their original ethnicity as their genetic “cards” are reshuffled (as whites probably have).

For these reasons, I wouldn’t give too much weight to the IQ stats of small samples of immigrants when considering the IQ of entire races, and I think caution should be used even when assessing the IQs of the immigrants themselves.

I'm highly suspicious about Chinese bug people scoring that high.

HAAAAA! African niggers score higher than American niggers?

Keep in mind that half of them fall below that mark.

In the 70s the AMA revised the threshold for mental retardation down ward because too many blacks fell under it.

I would say it is from the destruction of the school system.

Those numbers are all fucked up. Damn, look at the size of those error brackets! 10 year olds? For an IQ test? Try 20-50 year olds.

Remember that science is now about pleasing their money masters. They'll push and pull and cut and paste numbers until they get something near what their jewish masters want.

Keep in mind, whenever you see statistics come from these corrupt fucks, what they consider as "white".

https://files.catbox.moe/ypvk48.jpg

Reads the fucking article: yeah, the key words for dogshit are all there.

Survey, weighted score, short study time, super-small sample sizes, normalized scoring, more scoring normalizations on top of that, heavy exclusions to get a targeted sample, parents self-reported data of their own children(WTF!), etc etc.

This thing is all red flags.

So let me get this straight, the chinese are one group, but Whites are segmented and chopped up into 5+ categories? Why not take the average of all White sub variants compared to all chink variants? Why is only White split up but no one else?

I think if the top 1% of a shit hole country is smart enough to come here and succeed on their own merit, they probably have IQs well above the average in their land. 140 IQs are born everywhere of every race, it's just rare. If you collect up all the 140 Japanese and bring them here, all of a sudden all Japanese people have 140 IQ. America is not where you get your generalized sampling of other races.

Filipinos higher than Whites, and 'white-filipinos' higher than both? So science. Much valid.

Is it really representative though, or is there something else going on? I seem to remember that myth of the high jewish IQ being perpetrated because they chose their representatives from a handful of private jew schools, basically the 1%, while choosing the other representatives from public schools.

I'm not even on this scale numerically. Once again I am excluded.

10 year old American children.

What sets of gookers and sub-continent shit skins can afford to immigrate to the US? The smartest of the lot?

This is social engineering to justify White replacement. it's bullshit, top to bottom.

Asians and Whites are smart. Are we smarter? I say yes, but their culture puts more emphasis on studying and doing well.

If Whites had the same drive and encouragement of their parents they'd be up more.

Look at the spelling bee and math quiz teams. Nearly all Asian. Look at football, rugby or fag rugby(if you're a yank ) or whatever else teams, very few Asians, mostly all White (here at least) with the occasional nigger.