Sign into an existing account

You don't really believe that do you? Once a president issues a pardon, that is the end of the argument. There are no "Backsies" in a presidential pardon.

Because nobody seems to understand how presidential pardons work. It's completely within their power to issue a pardon, even if there's no conviction or even an indictment. If they haven't been convicted yet, it removes that as a possibility, so it's a form of protection. If they haven't even been indicted, it makes an indictment worthless because they can't go to trial, since there's no possibility of conviction.

But issuing a blanket pardon like that IS a tacit admission of guilt, even if they can't be judicially punished for it. And if you accept a pardon, it also means you can't claim 5th Amendment protections with respect to those charges. So if there are others involved, then you can be compelled to testify against yourself (as there's no danger of conviction/incarceration at that point, making the 5th Amendment moot) if they want you to tell everything you know so they can convict your co-conspirators. And without the 5th Amendment protections, you can be held for failure to appear/contempt, or locked up for perjury if you lie.

He'll likely do it if his kike handlers tell him to

I don't know that I fully agree with that! But, I will say that they should be used sparingly and in a very rare occurrence!

Another fair point, the question is, how much influence do these morons have have with those that hide in the shadows?

Depends on the ratio of evil

deleted