Researchers at the University of Arkansas have identified chloronitramide anion, a previously unknown byproduct of water disinfection that could have implications for public health, according to a new study published Thursday in Science.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 12:44:18 ago (+1/-0)
If the source chemicals - chloramines - has been in use in places for almost 100 years, there should be ample long term data to make a study. Why is this "discovery" something that looks to be a "new" concern?
Just because something hasn't been identified before, but the source has been in use for decades, doesn't make it a new threat just because it was "discovered" and labeled now.
Although this is just one more reason for cities to kill the chloramine lie and go back to real water treatments.
Because they're constantly coming up with patsies for dying of suddenly. The stupid filthy goyim weren't quite stupid enough to fall for climate change as the cause, so they had to bring in fancier sciencey explanations.
Good point. The (((msm))) probably would leave out the part where some locals have been using the chloramine for decades - because that would cause more normies to start pondering "it didn't use to kill us before".
The article says chloramine has been in use for decades and up to 20% of water treatments use it - making the math of it being dangerous as not working out.
There have not been any unexplained or endemic deaths in any location using the stuff that would point to any danger that would equate to something like vaxx deaths.
And before the early 2000s, when the chloramine use has been around for decades already, any pockets of unexplained problems would have been actually looked into by journalists, not like the (((journalists))) of today. Plus life expectancy has grown from the 1970s to the 2010s - making another strike against the chloramine use to be mostly a nothing burger.
Is using chloramine bad? Most likely. Is it deadly? Not from the evidence collected.
Buddy, i not really arguing it did or didn't - just shit posting, however any death can always be explained away by the medical establishment as being by something else - so did cause any deaths - likely not - but then again no one was actually checking if it may had been a cofounding or contributing factor for any cause of death.
EDIT: You seem to be completely remiss of the denial of past journalists and medical establishment in a range of deadly issues/ treatments. Top down Misinformation isnt just a recent thing.
I know you aren't arguing, but there is evidence that any huge crisis would have been investigated.
This isn't to say that small things can't cause comorbidities like you are saying, but that if there was a huge issue with long term use of chloramine, it most likely would have appeared by now.
Look at the Flint, MI crisis with the lead piping... that was covered pretty extensively - but no solution was easy.
How about the movie from a few years ago Dark Waters, about the teflon issue. Somebody started digging into that.
And the move Silkwood was about investigating workers that were getting contamination from improper handling of radioactive materials.
The whole Erin Brockovich investigation into contaminated water in a small town.
The movie The Insider, about the tobacco industry coverup, etc.
Thalidomide was pulled after only a few deaths and many birth defects - and it seemed like a pretty quick investigation and conclusion.
This is all to say that if something in the water was a huge cause for concern of millions of people - somebody somewhere would have noticed, most likely schools full of sick kids all in the same neighborhood.
Yes, there have always been secrets and coverups - Fluoride is one of them - but anything serious impacting huge cohorts, school kids are the best example of such, would have most likely been noticed in the last 100 years.
[ + ] FuckShitJesus
[ - ] FuckShitJesus 6 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 11:00:30 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Trope
[ - ] Trope 2 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 16:21:40 ago (+2/-0)
Everyone on this website invest in a good filter.
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 2 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 17:27:22 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Black Crimes Matter
[ - ] Black Crimes Matter 1 point 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 18:14:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 12:44:18 ago (+1/-0)
Just because something hasn't been identified before, but the source has been in use for decades, doesn't make it a new threat just because it was "discovered" and labeled now.
Although this is just one more reason for cities to kill the chloramine lie and go back to real water treatments.
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 13:20:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 13:35:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 14:40:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 15:10:56 ago (+0/-0)
The article says chloramine has been in use for decades and up to 20% of water treatments use it - making the math of it being dangerous as not working out.
There have not been any unexplained or endemic deaths in any location using the stuff that would point to any danger that would equate to something like vaxx deaths.
And before the early 2000s, when the chloramine use has been around for decades already, any pockets of unexplained problems would have been actually looked into by journalists, not like the (((journalists))) of today. Plus life expectancy has grown from the 1970s to the 2010s - making another strike against the chloramine use to be mostly a nothing burger.
Is using chloramine bad? Most likely. Is it deadly? Not from the evidence collected.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 17:40:47 ago (+0/-0)
EDIT: You seem to be completely remiss of the denial of past journalists and medical establishment in a range of deadly issues/ treatments. Top down Misinformation isnt just a recent thing.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 5 monthsNov 24, 2024 19:40:04 ago (+0/-0)
This isn't to say that small things can't cause comorbidities like you are saying, but that if there was a huge issue with long term use of chloramine, it most likely would have appeared by now.
Look at the Flint, MI crisis with the lead piping... that was covered pretty extensively - but no solution was easy.
How about the movie from a few years ago Dark Waters, about the teflon issue. Somebody started digging into that.
And the move Silkwood was about investigating workers that were getting contamination from improper handling of radioactive materials.
The whole Erin Brockovich investigation into contaminated water in a small town.
The movie The Insider, about the tobacco industry coverup, etc.
Thalidomide was pulled after only a few deaths and many birth defects - and it seemed like a pretty quick investigation and conclusion.
This is all to say that if something in the water was a huge cause for concern of millions of people - somebody somewhere would have noticed, most likely schools full of sick kids all in the same neighborhood.
Yes, there have always been secrets and coverups - Fluoride is one of them - but anything serious impacting huge cohorts, school kids are the best example of such, would have most likely been noticed in the last 100 years.