Yes, but less and less in the standard definition.
The guiding hand seems to be strong lately; coincidential decisions that happened to head towards unforseen but positive outcomes.
The inner monolog seems to be some sort of communication method more than just with yourself. Some dreams where its a scene of five seconds in life seem to come true months after...I call them "goal posts". Every so often I will see the goal posts dream scene play out...seems I'm on the right track, and it happens more than odds of coincidence.
I think there's something to the emotion "overwhelming joy" when certain ideas or decisions are made. Best I can describe is what you feel when your child is born, except through relatively ordinary decisions. Possibly using the intense positive as a strong way to steer someone.
I will give you this: One day in the life of the lonely Another day on the round about What do they need? Somebody to love One night in the life of the lonely There's a miracle on the screen What did they see? Somebody to love He guarantees you instant glory Get your money on the line Gotta send me a plastic Jesus There's a check in the mail today That's what I need Somebody to love We just won't meet on Sunday Gotta buy him a limousine Somewhere to live Somewhere to pray Every penny from the people Keeps the wolf outside the door Shop around and find forgiveness for yourself But he'll give you more, yeah Holy father, holy ghost Who's the one who pays the most Rock the cradle, don't you cry Buy another lullaby Jack is nimble, Jack is quick Pick your pocket, turn a trick Slow and steady, he's got time To commit another TV crime TV crime One day in the life of the lonely Back again on the round about What do they need Somebody to love Yeah One night in the life of the lonely Another miracle on the screen What did they see Somebody to love again A supermarket of salvation Take a look inside the store Shop around and find forgiveness for yourself But he gives more Holy father, holy ghost Who's the one who hurts you most Rock the cradle when you cry Scream another lullaby Jack be nimble, Jack be slick Take the money, get out quick Slow and steady, so much time To commit another TV crime TV crime
Goaters question everything, are skeptical of everything ever and for good reasons BUT they believe the dumbest and most BS story ever told without question.
[ - ] o0shad0o 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 19:15:33 ago (+1/-0)
The idea that there is a God, outside the system, that created that system, is not falsifiable. So it's not something that can be proven. It's also not something that can be disproven.
Aside from unverifiable stories from the past there's very little that might point to the existence of God. One thing I've noticed is that our universe is full of beauty, esthetics that elicit joy via the human senses, that were never visible during our evolution and therefore not something we should be programmed to enjoy. Microscopic and macroscopic patterns, images outside the visible range... It might be that the universe is fractal and we're just responding to signals similar to ones we've seen before, but...
Reminder: If you believe jesus is your LORD and SAVIOR, you are a jewed cuck, you will die a jew cuck, and if hell exists, you will be burning along side all the "sinners" who you believe you are better than because you fell for a jewish lie.
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
Once, many many years ago, I was an athicuck and a bit a fagan larper.
I even had the book "the blind watchmaker".
Then, when I started trying to get fit, I was skinny or maybe skinnyfat and wanted to get buff, I was reading a lot on the best methods and best diet, I was very conflicted with the diet aspect, a lot of media was screaming about the benefits of "plant based" at the time, but I just couldn't accept it. I gave up and prayed for an answer, send me a sign that I should eat an animal based diet (way before it became a thing) and instantly I received a sign.
That was me. I did a 180, I became a man of God and fixed my diet.
If I never did all that, I might be a worthless libshit soy right now.
I know there is something greater than humans. It's not "god" as one entity and humans are not one step below ultimate "god". That would be egoistic and narcissistic. p.s. Atheism is logically absolutely ridiculous notion.
There's only one God, but there's three of him. Also one's technically not a him because you can't have a son with just a father and a spirit. Totally not polytheism though, those three are actually one.
I can definitely tell the difference between a picture and a person. The dream person you talked about is the same as a picture, its not them, they exist elsewhere.
You went wayyy too deep with this. It's pretty simple.
But it is a separate stream of consciousness from your own and therefore a separate person from yourself.
No it isn't you added that shit yourself. You made that up.
This is becoming beleaguered in terms. We have to agree first on what a person is and you're being way too frivolous with that definition when we both knew damn well what I mean by "person" from observing my objections thus far.
Sometimes I think God is just someones feelings about their fathers, or their ideas about fatherhood. Sage Teacher, strict disciplinarian... The ultimate power in your life.
I call him Dad. She calls me Dad. The cycle continues.
Do vs don't or believe vs disbelieve implies an imbalance aka conflict...nature implies a balance, hence enabling each one within to wield choice freely. Others suggest sides to imbalance one choice, while binding it to the suggested.
To distract many from being partials (different) within whole (same)...few suggest bible/byblos aka a phonetician port to dock the different vessels (life) within the same sea (inception towards death) of moving sound (phonos). The bible as a document "docks-ur-mind" to suggested words, while tempting you to ignore perceivable sound, which cannot be held onto, since it moves.
completely different
Nature was complete before internal differentiation came into being. Nature reveals being by setting itself apart...few within nature tempt many back together to conceal natural revelation offering self discernment to each one who chooses to not ignore it.
Yes vs no + does vs doesn't imply yet more conflicts of reason aka imbalance for ones choice. Notice that I didn't wrote YES, yet you chose to reply with NO. I simply use implication (if/then) to show the contradictions within the minds of those who reason (versus) against each other.
Belief or disbelief is the resolution of that conflict.
a) Re-solu-tion implies ones reaction (life) to being dissolved (inception towards death) within action. The natural order (process of dying) implies the ongoing solution for each temporary problem (living) within. There's no conflict in-between living and dying, only the struggle for each ones life to grow during loss.
Few tempt many to ignore this by trying to find solutions (dying) for problems (living), which mutually destroys many within endless conflicts of reason for the sole benefit of few.
b) Can you give a rough estimate on how many believers and disbelievers are right now fighting each other in this world? Does choosing one side to feed these continuing wars sound like a resolution to any problem?
c) OR implies before choosing a side...VS implies after choosing a side. This is how FREE will of choice is tricked by the suggestion of others to bind itself into conflicts of reason.
A particular side of the fence has been chosen so the conflict has ended.
Aka the "line in the sand" for one side versus the "front line of war" for the other...both ignoring the one and only lifeline...inception towards death, which implies what? A moving line forcing adaptation from each one within.
No it does not.
That implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no) within your mind/memory, based on your consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing), while ignoring everything perceivable within nature. NO isn't a state within nature...it implies ones ignorance of natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), hence holding onto something, while ignoring that everything moves.
There are many imbalances in nature that exist.
a) There can be only ONE...for all implies one in EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power". Test this for yourself...if energy implies one, that what is two?
b) Nature doesn't generate plural...it sets itself (whole) apart (partials) internally. Few suggest pluralism to tempt consenting many together, hence amassing; collectivizing; mixing together. Why? Equalizing differences lowers the potential of each ones choice, which in return permits a chosen ones potential to reign supreme.
c) Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life) within...matter implies the choice; momentum implies the balance. FREE-DOM implies free will of choice (matter) within the dominating balance (momentum) of nature (motion) aka reactors (reactions) within a generator (action).
It ain't hard to discern this for self...it's just way easier to ignore it for all the bullshit others are offering for the price of selling oneself out.
In short...choice can only exist within balance; balance can only exist within motion.
d) Imbalance implies choice ignoring to balance, hence imbalancing itself by holding onto a side. Few suggest both sides of every conflict of reason to tempt many to imbalance their choices.
For example...Frosties vs Smacks implies a suggested imbalance, no matter which side one chooses. Being alive, while struggling within moving hunger by eating, implies ones choice within balance.
In short...Frosties (want) vs Smacks (not want) distracts one from hunger (need).
Listen up; city slicker...I ain't chasing after bitches in heat anymore since I learned how to lay pipe indoors. At room temperature the lady of the house comes to bed all by herself. As for weed...I ain't smoking it; I put my greens into tea to spread the warmth, while breathing in the aroma.
As for deep...nature moves perceivable inspiration so that each one within can draw from it at surface level. Ignoring this for suggested information buries ones memory underneath all the shit others are spouting...this self imposed burden tricks one to think that stuff is "deep".
The Gods are Junian archetypes. They are survival heuristics created by our ancestors to try and understand the nature of reality before they had the tools to investigate it.
The heuristics that were useful helped our ancestors survive and pass on their genes to the next generation. The heuristics that were harmful died with the idiots who created them.
With enough generations, these heuristics become selected as instict. So, the Gods are real in the sense that they are imprinted as engrams in the physical structure of our neurons.
This is why we must salute the Gods of our ancestors, because they represent our genes and the environment that shaped our genes.
Likewise, it is foolish to worship "Foreign Gods", because they have no representation in our instincts.
The Jewish God of the Bible is highly neurotic because the Jews are highly neurotic. Neuroticism is a beneficial trait when your population is surrounded and enslaved by thousands of years of empires rising and falling and subjecting their hegemony upon your population. Thus the Jew's slave morality was created.
Christianity is an extension of this, a slave morality for the diaspora of Israel. And the problem is, the mind virus infected Whites.
If you think "Whites are great because of Christianity", how much better would we be if we rid ourselves of the Jewish slave morality which is retarding our progress to create the future race of Ubermensch?
How could singular (one) survive among many (they) without sacrificing self? Heuristic implies discovering aka dividing cover through revelation...many cover singular, hence concealing revelation.
this is why we
If WE (plural) has power, then why does a chosen one (singular) have control over many, while suggesting "we the people"?
a) Schizo/schism implies a separation from, hence a differentiation...not a likeness.
b) Eugene Bleuler (the jew behind schizophrenia) and Sigismund Schlomo Freud (the jew behind psychoanalysis) conspired together to conquer psychiatry... https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/17221673338.jpg That's why gentiles these days psychoanalyze each other as "schizophrenic".
Who the fuck said anything about "sacrificing self"?
Sacrifice implies "offer"...ones consent to a suggestion by another implies a self sacrifice, which one does when joining others, hence when a singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (they). Nature doesn't establish plural...it sets singular units apart from one another.
Meet Bob. Bob attends church regularly, and is an active member of his congregation. Bob is very well known and respected. Bob becomes ill and goes to the hospital. He is give 50/50 odds of surviving.
Now meet Chet. Chet was born into an abusive house hold and grows up in and out of the system. Chet has no friends. Chet falls ill, goes to the hospital and is given 50/50 odds of survival.
Bob's congregation collectively pray for his health to return at every service. Hundreds of people beg god to save his life.
Chet has no one to pray for him. He has no hospital visitors.
If prayer had any effect, does it make sense that a social status would give one person a supernatural edge?
If prayer had any effect, does it make sense that a social status would give one person a supernatural edge?
Short answer?
Yes.
Speaking as someone who was "born into an abusive house hold", and yet with the help of God, attended church regularly, and eventually became a respected member of my community.
Next question.
Chet has no one to pray for him. He has no hospital visitors.
I think I found Chet's problem. Chet could pray. All he has to do is ask and he gets the exact same consideration from God as Bob does.
"And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, if ye have faith as much as is a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place, and it shall remove: and nothing shall be impossible unto you." - Matthew 17:20 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition).
God is fundamentally ON YOUR SIDE. He wants you to win. But you have to ask.
If Chet can't even be bothered to ask for his own salvation what is anyone else to do?
It is good to hear that you were able to right your ship. So many do not / cannot.
What about people who live in other places, and worship other gods? Are they still not god's children, even though they have no knowledge of (your) god or the rituals required for salvation?
You hear liberals constantly making the "fairness" argument. If it's not a perfect solution that makes everyone happy, then it's more "fair" to just do nothing at all. If you can't save the whole world, then just save nobody. Let everyone burn "equally". Fuck that.
Not everybody gets saved. It is enough to do what is within the span of my arm. I'm not going to waste one seconds worry on what is beyond that.
The entire premise of your faith is to do more than what is within the span of your arm. Faith comes with obligations. Some of them are nonsensical. Personally, I don't much care what any faith does, as long as it doesn't complicate my life, or infringe on my freedoms.
Personally, I don't much care what any faith does, as long as it doesn't complicate my life, or infringe on my freedoms.
...she said, as she lectured complete strangers on the premise of THEIR faith, what obligations THEIR faith entails, what THEY SHOULD do with THEIR lives.
"Hypocrite, first cast out that beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye." - Matthew 7:5 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition).
You gotta lotta goddamm balls to be that un-self aware and run your suck hole that loose, sweetheart.
The total risk and cost to you is nothing at all.
Go pester someone else with your bullshit. I'm NOT the kind of small-c "christian" to which you are clearly accustomed.
I'm the other kind. I have been through the fire. I have sacrificed for my faith. And you haven't the slightest idea what "the span of my arm" encompasses.
As you wish. I purposely did not create a scripture war. I have fair command of bible verse. I have three biblical responses that refute what you assert. It doesn't matter to me. Call me names, whatever. Weakness lies in the cracks of your logic.
Do I get 3 of em? Or just 1 for something I cant use until I die?
Be honest.
Also your "you do still" remark seems to imply that one cannot question? As in since I questioned, I must not have done your magic dance. Do you believe that to be the case?
It's my belief that all effects of prayer are to the mind and consciousness of the person praying. This change of state may or may not affect the response of the world around them.
So, a meditative quality. Internal vs external. It would make more sense than the popular religious explanation. Buddhists chant for what they desire (oversimplification). Hindus have pujas, very similar. It is kind of like manifesting...the old definition, not the teenage girls trying to manifest a pop star to fall in love with them.
Lifts your spirit, imparts wisdom, gives peace. All of those at once or just one or two. Sometimes it gives one the satisfaction of praising the Lord God that made and saved. I know it has become rote in prayers, the public ones, to start with thank you that it almost seems just part of ritual, but when it's just you and the Lord God and boy, stuff is messed up, feels like it is crashing down on your head while you are hanging by 2 fingers from a cliff and the first thing you say in prayer is "Thank you for the spritiual salvation you gave me. I am still blessed because of You," then, I don't know, prayer can be so much and so little, depending on the person doing the praying.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 19:22:47 ago (+0/-0)
The guiding hand seems to be strong lately; coincidential decisions that happened to head towards unforseen but positive outcomes.
The inner monolog seems to be some sort of communication method more than just with yourself. Some dreams where its a scene of five seconds in life seem to come true months after...I call them "goal posts". Every so often I will see the goal posts dream scene play out...seems I'm on the right track, and it happens more than odds of coincidence.
I think there's something to the emotion "overwhelming joy" when certain ideas or decisions are made. Best I can describe is what you feel when your child is born, except through relatively ordinary decisions. Possibly using the intense positive as a strong way to steer someone.
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 18:27:34 ago (+0/-0)
One day in the life of the lonely
Another day on the round about
What do they need?
Somebody to love
One night in the life of the lonely
There's a miracle on the screen
What did they see?
Somebody to love
He guarantees you instant glory
Get your money on the line
Gotta send me a plastic Jesus
There's a check in the mail today
That's what I need
Somebody to love
We just won't meet on Sunday
Gotta buy him a limousine
Somewhere to live
Somewhere to pray
Every penny from the people
Keeps the wolf outside the door
Shop around and find forgiveness for yourself
But he'll give you more, yeah
Holy father, holy ghost
Who's the one who pays the most
Rock the cradle, don't you cry
Buy another lullaby
Jack is nimble, Jack is quick
Pick your pocket, turn a trick
Slow and steady, he's got time
To commit another TV crime
TV crime
One day in the life of the lonely
Back again on the round about
What do they need
Somebody to love
Yeah
One night in the life of the lonely
Another miracle on the screen
What did they see
Somebody to love again
A supermarket of salvation
Take a look inside the store
Shop around and find forgiveness for yourself
But he gives more
Holy father, holy ghost
Who's the one who hurts you most
Rock the cradle when you cry
Scream another lullaby
Jack be nimble, Jack be slick
Take the money, get out quick
Slow and steady, so much time
To commit another
TV crime
TV crime
TV Crimes: Black Sabbath. DIO.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 1 point 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 03:57:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 01:00:18 ago (+1/-1)
Boggles my mind.
[ + ] White_Pride_Cis
[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 1 point 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 00:57:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 21:29:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 22:33:22 ago (+0/-0)
edit: d00000d... if you type in a editbox the word Nephilims and u get the spellcheck red squiggles, you right click... changes to Philistines. LAWL
[ + ] o0shad0o
[ - ] o0shad0o 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 19:15:33 ago (+1/-0)
Aside from unverifiable stories from the past there's very little that might point to the existence of God. One thing I've noticed is that our universe is full of beauty, esthetics that elicit joy via the human senses, that were never visible during our evolution and therefore not something we should be programmed to enjoy. Microscopic and macroscopic patterns, images outside the visible range... It might be that the universe is fractal and we're just responding to signals similar to ones we've seen before, but...
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 18:15:58 ago (+0/-0)
Fuck no.
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:23:18 ago (+0/-1)
Since you just used the word "god" as though it's a name, I'll assume you mean the jew gods; YHWH, JHVH, and BA'AL that the christcucks worship.
No.
[ + ] HatefulHomelessMan
[ - ] HatefulHomelessMan 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:20:21 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:18:02 ago (+0/-0)
https://medium.com/@agirmaus/conversations-with-god-neale-donald-walsch-4507e4891ce3
[ + ] Deplorablepoetry
[ - ] Deplorablepoetry 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:04:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:36:14 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] MelGlibson
[ - ] MelGlibson 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:26:19 ago (+2/-1)
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jesus is the Truth, the light and the way. God is Truth unmoving because it is already there eternal because Truth does not change.
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig -2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:16:32 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 3 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:20:23 ago (+3/-0)
Niggers and shit skins exist, jews exist, pedos don't get slaughtered, and children get cancer.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:38:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MelGlibson
[ - ] MelGlibson 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:46:44 ago (+0/-0)
So why don't you stop ?
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:15:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 19:36:53 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.elixirofknowledge.com/2014_06_01_archive.html
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:41:20 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] HatefulHomelessMan
[ - ] HatefulHomelessMan 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:22:55 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:26:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 8 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:17:24 ago (+8/-0)
I even had the book "the blind watchmaker".
Then, when I started trying to get fit, I was skinny or maybe skinnyfat and wanted to get buff, I was reading a lot on the best methods and best diet, I was very conflicted with the diet aspect, a lot of media was screaming about the benefits of "plant based" at the time, but I just couldn't accept it. I gave up and prayed for an answer, send me a sign that I should eat an animal based diet (way before it became a thing) and instantly I received a sign.
That was me. I did a 180, I became a man of God and fixed my diet.
If I never did all that, I might be a worthless libshit soy right now.
So literally, thank God for that.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 4 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:37:59 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] HatefulHomelessMan
[ - ] HatefulHomelessMan 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:21:15 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness -1 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 03:49:13 ago (+0/-1)
A picture fell off the wall? An Arab beamed down? What fucking sign?
It better not just be internal i-say-so thing. That's dishonest af.
[ + ] Rob3122
[ - ] Rob3122 -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:04:44 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] albatrosv15
[ - ] albatrosv15 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:02:32 ago (+1/-0)
p.s. Atheism is logically absolutely ridiculous notion.
[ + ] GeorgeBailey
[ - ] GeorgeBailey 5 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:49:32 ago (+5/-0)
Father-son-spirit
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:46:21 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 12:57:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:44:00 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness -1 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 03:52:17 ago (+0/-1)
It's still pretty unusual.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 06:41:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 13:06:52 ago (+0/-0)
Simple, It's not a person, its a REPRESENTATION (ie: not real or accurate) of a person created by your mind.
Go open your yearbook. See all those people. Those are pictures of people, not people in a book.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 21:52:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 02:58:07 ago (+0/-0)
The dream person you talked about is the same as a picture, its not them, they exist elsewhere.
You went wayyy too deep with this. It's pretty simple.
No it isn't you added that shit yourself. You made that up.
I concede we dont actually know anything.
Next...
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 06:51:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 06:59:31 ago (+0/-0)
We have to agree first on what a person is and you're being way too frivolous with that definition when we both knew damn well what I mean by "person" from observing my objections thus far.
Harumph to you sir.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 06:51:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 03:50:46 ago (+0/-0)
Sage Teacher, strict disciplinarian... The ultimate power in your life.
I call him Dad.
She calls me Dad.
The cycle continues.
O M G
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 07:17:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:32:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:28:25 ago (+2/-3)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist -2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:14:41 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:40:29 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:14:26 ago (+1/-2)
Do vs don't or believe vs disbelieve implies an imbalance aka conflict...nature implies a balance, hence enabling each one within to wield choice freely. Others suggest sides to imbalance one choice, while binding it to the suggested.
Never yours, since concept/concapere implies "taking together"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept#etymonline_v_17307
To distract many from being partials (different) within whole (same)...few suggest bible/byblos aka a phonetician port to dock the different vessels (life) within the same sea (inception towards death) of moving sound (phonos). The bible as a document "docks-ur-mind" to suggested words, while tempting you to ignore perceivable sound, which cannot be held onto, since it moves.
Nature was complete before internal differentiation came into being. Nature reveals being by setting itself apart...few within nature tempt many back together to conceal natural revelation offering self discernment to each one who chooses to not ignore it.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 3 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:33:19 ago (+3/-0)
No it doesn't. Belief or disbelief is the resolution of that conflict. A particular side of the fence has been chosen so the conflict has ended.
No it does not. There are many imbalances in nature that exist.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 07:03:01 ago (+0/-0)
Yes vs no + does vs doesn't imply yet more conflicts of reason aka imbalance for ones choice. Notice that I didn't wrote YES, yet you chose to reply with NO. I simply use implication (if/then) to show the contradictions within the minds of those who reason (versus) against each other.
a) Re-solu-tion implies ones reaction (life) to being dissolved (inception towards death) within action. The natural order (process of dying) implies the ongoing solution for each temporary problem (living) within. There's no conflict in-between living and dying, only the struggle for each ones life to grow during loss.
Few tempt many to ignore this by trying to find solutions (dying) for problems (living), which mutually destroys many within endless conflicts of reason for the sole benefit of few.
b) Can you give a rough estimate on how many believers and disbelievers are right now fighting each other in this world? Does choosing one side to feed these continuing wars sound like a resolution to any problem?
c) OR implies before choosing a side...VS implies after choosing a side. This is how FREE will of choice is tricked by the suggestion of others to bind itself into conflicts of reason.
Aka the "line in the sand" for one side versus the "front line of war" for the other...both ignoring the one and only lifeline...inception towards death, which implies what? A moving line forcing adaptation from each one within.
That implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no) within your mind/memory, based on your consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing), while ignoring everything perceivable within nature. NO isn't a state within nature...it implies ones ignorance of natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), hence holding onto something, while ignoring that everything moves.
a) There can be only ONE...for all implies one in EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power". Test this for yourself...if energy implies one, that what is two?
b) Nature doesn't generate plural...it sets itself (whole) apart (partials) internally. Few suggest pluralism to tempt consenting many together, hence amassing; collectivizing; mixing together. Why? Equalizing differences lowers the potential of each ones choice, which in return permits a chosen ones potential to reign supreme.
c) Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life) within...matter implies the choice; momentum implies the balance. FREE-DOM implies free will of choice (matter) within the dominating balance (momentum) of nature (motion) aka reactors (reactions) within a generator (action).
It ain't hard to discern this for self...it's just way easier to ignore it for all the bullshit others are offering for the price of selling oneself out.
In short...choice can only exist within balance; balance can only exist within motion.
d) Imbalance implies choice ignoring to balance, hence imbalancing itself by holding onto a side. Few suggest both sides of every conflict of reason to tempt many to imbalance their choices.
For example...Frosties vs Smacks implies a suggested imbalance, no matter which side one chooses. Being alive, while struggling within moving hunger by eating, implies ones choice within balance.
In short...Frosties (want) vs Smacks (not want) distracts one from hunger (need).
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:19:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 06:11:43 ago (+0/-0)
As for deep...nature moves perceivable inspiration so that each one within can draw from it at surface level. Ignoring this for suggested information buries ones memory underneath all the shit others are spouting...this self imposed burden tricks one to think that stuff is "deep".
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 13:57:11 ago (+4/-3)*
They are survival heuristics created by our ancestors to try and understand the nature of reality before they had the tools to investigate it.
The heuristics that were useful helped our ancestors survive and pass on their genes to the next generation.
The heuristics that were harmful died with the idiots who created them.
With enough generations, these heuristics become selected as instict.
So, the Gods are real in the sense that they are imprinted as engrams in the physical structure of our neurons.
This is why we must salute the Gods of our ancestors, because they represent our genes and the environment that shaped our genes.
Likewise, it is foolish to worship "Foreign Gods", because they have no representation in our instincts.
The Jewish God of the Bible is highly neurotic because the Jews are highly neurotic.
Neuroticism is a beneficial trait when your population is surrounded and enslaved by thousands of years of empires rising and falling and subjecting their hegemony upon your population.
Thus the Jew's slave morality was created.
Christianity is an extension of this, a slave morality for the diaspora of Israel.
And the problem is, the mind virus infected Whites.
If you think "Whites are great because of Christianity", how much better would we be if we rid ourselves of the Jewish slave morality which is retarding our progress to create the future race of Ubermensch?
Heil Odin! o/
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:21:41 ago (+3/-1)
How could singular (one) survive among many (they) without sacrificing self? Heuristic implies discovering aka dividing cover through revelation...many cover singular, hence concealing revelation.
If WE (plural) has power, then why does a chosen one (singular) have control over many, while suggesting "we the people"?
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:05:42 ago (+3/-0)
Who the fuck said anything about "sacrificing self"?
I stopped reading after that.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 06:25:36 ago (+0/-0)
a) Schizo/schism implies a separation from, hence a differentiation...not a likeness.
b) Eugene Bleuler (the jew behind schizophrenia) and Sigismund Schlomo Freud (the jew behind psychoanalysis) conspired together to conquer psychiatry... https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/17221673338.jpg
Sacrifice implies "offer"...ones consent to a suggestion by another implies a self sacrifice, which one does when joining others, hence when a singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (they). Nature doesn't establish plural...it sets singular units apart from one another.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 13:43:45 ago (+4/-2)
Now meet Chet. Chet was born into an abusive house hold and grows up in and out of the system. Chet has no friends. Chet falls ill, goes to the hospital and is given 50/50 odds of survival.
Bob's congregation collectively pray for his health to return at every service. Hundreds of people beg god to save his life.
Chet has no one to pray for him. He has no hospital visitors.
If prayer had any effect, does it make sense that a social status would give one person a supernatural edge?
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 6 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:25:29 ago (+6/-0)*
Short answer?
Yes.
Speaking as someone who was "born into an abusive house hold", and yet with the help of God, attended church regularly, and eventually became a respected member of my community.
Next question.
I think I found Chet's problem. Chet could pray. All he has to do is ask and he gets the exact same consideration from God as Bob does.
"And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, if ye have faith as much as is a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place, and it shall remove: and nothing shall be impossible unto you." - Matthew 17:20 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition).
God is fundamentally ON YOUR SIDE. He wants you to win. But you have to ask.
If Chet can't even be bothered to ask for his own salvation what is anyone else to do?
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 3 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:50:04 ago (+3/-0)
What about people who live in other places, and worship other gods? Are they still not god's children, even though they have no knowledge of (your) god or the rituals required for salvation?
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 4 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:58:38 ago (+4/-0)*
You hear liberals constantly making the "fairness" argument. If it's not a perfect solution that makes everyone happy, then it's more "fair" to just do nothing at all. If you can't save the whole world, then just save nobody. Let everyone burn "equally". Fuck that.
Not everybody gets saved. It is enough to do what is within the span of my arm. I'm not going to waste one seconds worry on what is beyond that.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:17:59 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:54:52 ago (+2/-0)*
...she said, as she lectured complete strangers on the premise of THEIR faith, what obligations THEIR faith entails, what THEY SHOULD do with THEIR lives.
"Hypocrite, first cast out that beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye."
- Matthew 7:5 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition).
You gotta lotta goddamm balls to be that un-self aware and run your suck hole that loose, sweetheart.
The total risk and cost to you is nothing at all.
Go pester someone else with your bullshit. I'm NOT the kind of small-c "christian" to which you are clearly accustomed.
I'm the other kind. I have been through the fire. I have sacrificed for my faith.
And you haven't the slightest idea what "the span of my arm" encompasses.
https://files.catbox.moe/wdopme.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_9X1e1Odrg
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 21:48:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 23:29:04 ago (+1/-0)*
The whole world does NOT revolve on a spindle that's centered in YOUR ASS.
Then stop preaching at people as if you think you know them. Stop telling other people what THEIR faith requires of them.
The job of savior was already taken, remember? And you aint it.
And yet still, somehow, have learned nothing at all. A parrot can be taught to repeat scripture. That doesn't mean he understands what he's saying.
While yours simply lies. Right up front.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 01:04:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 1 point 7 monthsNov 17, 2024 01:14:50 ago (+1/-0)
Telling you the truth does not make me yours.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 03:01:21 ago (+0/-0)
That doesnt strike you as a bit of a pagan paradigm?
What kind of trickster god is this?
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 13:39:45 ago (+0/-0)
You are familiar with the whole concept of "free will", right?
It's a matter of your intention. To knowingly and willfully ask for help.
Or not.
You do still have that option. It's on you.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 22:29:46 ago (+0/-0)
Do I get 3 of em?
Or just 1 for something I cant use until I die?
Be honest.
Also your "you do still" remark seems to imply that one cannot question?
As in since I questioned, I must not have done your magic dance.
Do you believe that to be the case?
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 18, 2024 22:46:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:51:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:52:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:21:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 15:36:37 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 1 point 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 17:13:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 2 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 16:49:06 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 7 monthsNov 16, 2024 14:28:14 ago (+1/-2)
Inception sentences life towards point of death... zero survial chance, hence nature evening out any odds within.
The natural edge implies "knowledge"...which ones perception ignores when consenting to suggested "supernatural edge".