People used to be free range and self-responsible. The ranchers perceived these mammals as a potentially exploitable resource, and began a program to domesticate and multiply them. Now they have vast herds under their control who would die without the ranchers, and it's given them enormous power and profits.
You are hopefully a stray outside of their metaphorical fencing, and are maintaining your survival skills separately from the ranch and the roving ranch hands.
Could be fleshed out more if you like, cell phones being superior to ear tags, prohibitions against non-ranch food sources, mandatory 'vaccine' injections of the herd stock, and the herd-mixing projects to optimize their results.
Yes, the "cattle and rancher" metaphor is just that; A metaphor. They're openly farming humans, folks, and most of their stock has no clue.
It will be so interesting to see who our new ranch manager will be.
As a former cattle rancher, and technically still a rancher but for goats, I never brought in wild dogs to kill my livestock. Nor did I poison my cattle. I never let them starve, and absolutely never tried to starve them. I didn't strip them of shelter, and I provided it for them.
They don't see the public as cattle. It's worse than that.
You're never going to be able to understand the jews until you let go of the notion that their drive is about money and power.
they already have all the money and power, and have had it for 200+ years. They fucking do not care about money, they print it from thin air. They want the eradication of all life on Earth, starting with Whites.
a) Range (perception) or Ranch (suggestion)...ones free will of choice.
b) Metaphor aka meta (across) pherein (to carry) implies ones perception being moved across all perceivable, while being tempted to carry the suggestions by other ones, hence burdening self.
Com (together) ment (mind)...action sets minds apart from one another so that each one can react differently.The suggested word "comment" tempts one to ignore actual (ment) for fictional (com). You have an actual mind, but not a mind together with others.
it's in your private language
A jew makes language public by tempting gentiles to privately hold onto suggested definitions aka words. Nature implies sound privatizing each instrument within, hence making each ones perception "not open to public".
I don't speak in my own language...I try to describe how a jew suggests languages to gentiles, who claim ownership over definitions by consenting to hold onto them. I try to break the spell that binds gentiles.
too abstruse
Nature doesn't hide anything. Holding onto a suggested definition to describe a moving nature...hides the moving nature from ones perception.
How is it that I break words apart, yet are being told to be too abtruse/abstrusus - "hidden; concealed; secret"? How does breaking apart conceal anything?
range or ranch
How would you describe the difference between suggested information keeping one confined on the ranch of "definitions", while perceivable inspiration allows one free range to express self?
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 3 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 15:27:49 ago (+3/-0)
They don't see the public as cattle. It's worse than that.
You're never going to be able to understand the jews until you let go of the notion that their drive is about money and power.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 [op] 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 16:57:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 3 monthsJan 8, 2025 10:08:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 8, 2025 15:19:11 ago (+0/-0)
I suspect they're either behind or heavily supported the massive spike in human population that obviously would lead to our current conditions.
[ + ] DitchPig
[ - ] DitchPig 3 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 14:35:07 ago (+3/-0)
The only case in which you care about maintaining a population is in ranching.
economically a smaller generation proceeding a large one should be a winning situation for the smaller generation.
higher pay, lower costs (especially real estate) should be the two main effects of a lower population. But no, can't have that!
Must have ever increasing population/taxes/profits/suffering!
fucking kikes
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 2 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 14:07:50 ago (+2/-0)
b) Metaphor aka meta (across) pherein (to carry) implies ones perception being moved across all perceivable, while being tempted to carry the suggestions by other ones, hence burdening self.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 [op] 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 14:25:26 ago (+0/-0)
(Yes, I deliberately avoided using the word 'understand', so you wouldn't tangent off on "standing under someone or some thing".)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 14:52:56 ago (+0/-0)
Com (together) ment (mind)...action sets minds apart from one another so that each one can react differently.The suggested word "comment" tempts one to ignore actual (ment) for fictional (com). You have an actual mind, but not a mind together with others.
A jew makes language public by tempting gentiles to privately hold onto suggested definitions aka words. Nature implies sound privatizing each instrument within, hence making each ones perception "not open to public".
I don't speak in my own language...I try to describe how a jew suggests languages to gentiles, who claim ownership over definitions by consenting to hold onto them. I try to break the spell that binds gentiles.
Nature doesn't hide anything. Holding onto a suggested definition to describe a moving nature...hides the moving nature from ones perception.
How is it that I break words apart, yet are being told to be too abtruse/abstrusus - "hidden; concealed; secret"? How does breaking apart conceal anything?
How would you describe the difference between suggested information keeping one confined on the ranch of "definitions", while perceivable inspiration allows one free range to express self?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 15:53:32 ago (+1/-0)