b) A jew suggests traditionalism to tempt gentiles into deviations from tradition. The issue...gentiles cannot deviate (going astray) after consenting to a suggested -ism, only turn against each other or switch sides.
c) Tradition in nature implies trans (pass through) dare (to give) and implies flow passing through (inception towards death) while giving form (life), hence any deviation from living ending up with the tradition of dying.
That implies a synonym aka "one having the same sense as another"...nature doesn't do that. It differentiates each one from one another. Nature also moves, hence sentencing each life from inception towards "point" of death.
Few tempt many to use the synonym "making a point" to equalize their life sentences. What's the point of reason; religion; definitions; civilizations etc.? Any attempt to make a point simply destroys sentence/sentiere - "to perceive".
non-sense
How could nothing be sensed? If non implies "lack of", then what is all of nature lacking?
etymology...I might even agree with you.
Logy/logic - "reason" implies the conflict of agreeing vs disagree within you. I'm not part of that conflict, since I use implication over reason...
I try to utilize etymon (actual balance) to describe the contradictions of logy (fictional conflict)...
definitions
To define implies "affixing"...how could that work within a moving nature? Why are there multiple (even contradicting) definitions for words if defining implies affixing?
Why are many concerned about upholding tradition when one of its definitions (a delivering up, surrender, a handing down, a giving up) implies submission to few?
listing etymology or definitions
Why does etymology and definitions exist? What's the benefit thereof? How are ones senses influenced by either? Is there any other life form using them? How can another life form interact with anything that isn't defined as something?
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 13:02:24 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark [op] 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 13:04:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 17:29:28 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark [op] 0 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 17:38:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -2 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 13:06:19 ago (+0/-2)
b) A jew suggests traditionalism to tempt gentiles into deviations from tradition. The issue...gentiles cannot deviate (going astray) after consenting to a suggested -ism, only turn against each other or switch sides.
c) Tradition in nature implies trans (pass through) dare (to give) and implies flow passing through (inception towards death) while giving form (life), hence any deviation from living ending up with the tradition of dying.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 5 monthsNov 5, 2024 17:28:27 ago (+0/-1)
But this non-sense of listing etymology or definitions is just that; non-sense.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 5 monthsNov 6, 2024 06:58:34 ago (+0/-0)
That implies a synonym aka "one having the same sense as another"...nature doesn't do that. It differentiates each one from one another. Nature also moves, hence sentencing each life from inception towards "point" of death.
Few tempt many to use the synonym "making a point" to equalize their life sentences. What's the point of reason; religion; definitions; civilizations etc.? Any attempt to make a point simply destroys sentence/sentiere - "to perceive".
How could nothing be sensed? If non implies "lack of", then what is all of nature lacking?
Logy/logic - "reason" implies the conflict of agreeing vs disagree within you. I'm not part of that conflict, since I use implication over reason...
I try to utilize etymon (actual balance) to describe the contradictions of logy (fictional conflict)...
To define implies "affixing"...how could that work within a moving nature? Why are there multiple (even contradicting) definitions for words if defining implies affixing?
Why are many concerned about upholding tradition when one of its definitions (a delivering up, surrender, a handing down, a giving up) implies submission to few?
Why does etymology and definitions exist? What's the benefit thereof? How are ones senses influenced by either? Is there any other life form using them? How can another life form interact with anything that isn't defined as something?