×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3

How do feminists abuse their power?

submitted by kingofhearts to whatever 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:10:03 ago (+4/-1)     (whatever)

They abuse their power in many, many ways. But the one power abuse that is interesting is their strategy to limit men's access to highly attractive young females, so they are forced to settle for older, less attractive ones. One way they do this is by spreading the initial definition of "pedophilia" to absurd levels.

What is real pedophilia? The definition of pedophilia is "The EXCLUSIVE or nearly exclusive attraction to boys or girls who are NOT IN PUBERTY YET." This means that someone is a pedophile if they are ONLY attracted to boys or girls of age 10 or younger, as most boys and girls of older age are already in puberty. So gtfo if you want to say I am a pedophile and shove your outrage up your ass. YOU ARE WRONG, no matter how often you blurt that shit out.

What is fake feminist pedophilia outrage? Feminists accuse men of pedophilia who only dare to look at teen girls. This is absurd and completely misleading. Attraction to young teens (around age 14) is not only completely NORMAL but OPTIMAL, that's why the vast majority of men feels attracted to girls of that age. Science, history and reason confirm that over and over again.

Science: All 3 scientific studies that have been done to determine the maximum attractiveness of women in relation to their age had the result that people find girls of age 14 most attractive. All 3 of them! Particularly interesting is that there is no difference between men and women. Women also feel this way that females look most attractive at age 14. So sexual attraction to young girls is completely NORMAL. ALL NORMAL people feel this way, also women. And please don't try to argue that beauty, attraction and sexual attraction would be different things because science has already shown that it's exactly the same for females of fertile age.

All IQ- and maturity tests show an amazing phenomenon: Though women have a slightly lower IQ than men at adult age, girls at age 11-15 are actually ahead of boys. Well, what super important decision might it be that makes girls brains mature quicker for the price of sacrificing some of women's IQ in later life? Well, look at the history section further down, maybe you can come up with an answer.

Finally scientific studies also contradict the notion that young teen girls would make bad decisions in relationships. Actually they make BETTER choices than their own mothers in being more cautious whom to date, scientific studies have shown. So, overall the argument that young teens would not be ready for relationships does not hold up in science. It rather seems that the opposite is true. Evolution has prepared young girls for early relationships by giving them high libido as well as maturity during this crucial time, and science confirms this impressively.

History: The most common marriage age through 99.9% of human history and with very few exceptions in nearly all human cultures was age 13-14. Only in recent times during which the influence of feminists rose, the marriage age rose as well, leading now to the threatening situation that reproductive rates in western countries have dropped under the levels of self sustainability, meaning western people are slowly dying out. During 99.9% of human history nobody ever saw much wrong with big age differences. Being of different race, religion, culture or social class was always considered much more of a problem.

Logic, Reason & Evolution: The younger a man's bride is, the more children he and she are going to have, particularly in societies in which life long monogamy was the norm - which were all societies before modern divorce laws were invented. It's important to note that girls also benefit from marrying young as they also have more offspring. That's the reason why girls feel strong sexual desire as soon as they hit puberty. To maximize the number of offspring the ideal age to marry is simply as soon as a girl becomes fertile. That's why in almost all cultures girls married right when they hit menarche, which today is about age 12, in the past it was about age 13.

Men who married older women did not have so much offspring, did not reproduce so successfully and thus their genes died out sooner or later. That's called "sexual selection" and is the reason why over time only the genes of men who preferred young, healthy, fertile brides instead of old women survived. The same selection led to women preferring fit, strong, tall, capable, successful, dominant men, because they maximized their chances to have lots of healthy, successful offspring that will be fit and attractive enough to also reproduce successfully. Such developments are not only natural but inevitable in evolution. Every evolutionary scientist can confirm that.

To sum it all up:

Because throughout 99.9% of human history the traditional marriage age for girls was the age of menarche, roughly age 13, men are PARTICULARLY attracted to girls around this age. These were the girls that were eligible for marriage AND would give them the best chances to have lots of offspring. No wonder, that men were and still are particularly interested in girls of that age. It's deeply imprinted in their genes, just as it's deeply routed in women's genes to have high sexual desire at that age and look for strong, fit, dominant men.

If attraction to young teens is the optimal male behavior, why is it so heavily disputed in our time? People who are in power always try to abuse their power. One of the most important forms of power abuse is to limit other people's sexual options while increasing your own. Harems during times of patriarchy are a great example of such power abuse. Today we live in a matriarchy in which feminists determine topics, outrage and societal norms. By declaring the attraction of men to young girls as "abuse" or by making it illegal they effectively force them to choose older women. That's the underlying motivation. Even better, by taking girls up to age 17 out of the potential mating pool, they not only eliminate one sixth of all eligible females but also the most attractive ones. A huge win for older women which raises their chances to get a male partner considerably and THAT's the reason why women constantly tried to raise the age of consent and spread the definition of pedophilia wider and wider, to completely absurd levels. And they will NEVER stop doing so if men always give in. It only will get more and more absurd.

But feminists say it's all only about protecting children!? First, girls of age 13+ are not children. They were always considered being adults during 99.9% of human history. This is an invention by feminists as so much else. Even in the eyes of the law they are not children but teens. Feminists abuse the term "children" purposely to increase the outrage factor. Second, this is an excuse and not an argument. Women, particularly feminists, today ABORT MORE CHILDREN THAN ARE BORN. Most feminists don't want children at all and abort them as soon as they get pregnant. The "argument" that it would be about the children is laughable. It's about their own advantage. Their own advantage is their real motivation.

Do you have some evidence that feminists don't really care about children? Yes. Just look what makes feminists go protest on the streets in really big numbers. They protest for their right to ABORT kids and not to protect them. And now women want to "protect" the lives of purely virtual "children" such as virtual bots, sex dolls depicting minors or future little girl sex robots? Lol, that's so laughable. Their real motivation is to deny men of attractive sexual options, so more men will be forced to settle for old, unattractive women.

Why is it so important to stop the feminist power abuse? Because any form of power abuse only gets worse and worse. Before feminism there was no age of consent at all, then it was 12, later 14 then 16 and now in some states it is as absurdly high as 18. But that's not the end. Feminist groups already demand that all females under age 24 should be off limits for men over 30! And that's still not the end. Now more and more things become illegal where no minors are harmed at all. Such as pseudo-photographic images of young virtual AI generated people that do not depict real minors at all. In some completely retarded countries even drawings of virtual minors are illegal. Feminists campaign already to make porn, prostitution, text and virtual bots illegal and they sure will try everything to fight sex robots when they come out. They are also trying to make young looking anime characters illegal. If you don't fight power abuse, it will only get worse. This is the most important thing you must be aware of.

What can you do to stop and roll back the feminist power abuse and make things normal again? Every action makes a difference. Every comment, every like, every thumbs up for the right cause. Always stick to the law, because it helps no one if you end up in prison, even if you have done nothing wrong. BUT fight for your rights, spread the word, raise awareness. Use the areas where it is still possible to demonstrate the completely natural attraction of the vast majority of men to young teens, get feminists to voice their petty moral outcries and use that as a tool to make more people aware of the massive power abuse by feminism. That's exactly what I am doing. This webpage that still allows free speech and complete anonymity is a great place for that. So make use of your right of free speech as long as it is not taken away from you. If you keep silent, things will only get worse and never better. The only thing you should not do is encouraging people to break existing laws. Encourage them instead to raise awareness how unfair and absurd these laws are and that they should be changed. You are not alone.

What's the most important message to spread? That attraction to young teens HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PEDOPHILIA AT ALL but is completely normal. ALL NORMAL MEN who are honest to themselves feel this attraction. Don't let feminist tell you this would be abnormal because it isn't. Even more so as you have the full support of logic, reason, history and science. Don't let feminist cry louder than all that. Besides crying, whining, faking outrage and calling everyone a "pedo" they have no arguments at all. Science, history and reason are all on our side.


28 comments block


[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 13:09:33 ago (+0/-0)

In every way possible.

(I didn't read your post. It was just too damn long)

[ - ] CoronaHoax 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 08:19:18 ago (+1/-0)

I always thought something is perverted in the way marriage at really late ages and schooling into the twenties was to fuck up society and pervert nature in some way.

No matter what you might say - “women should be having kids in early twenties etc”, NATURE says otherwise. Our timing is deliberately set off for some reason.

I think the issue in part is also when males are / should be considered a mature male as well . Men aren’t supposed to be “children” until like 21 and shit. I know I was professionally capable in my current field at 14.

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 07:48:51 ago (+1/-0)

Even if you don't like it this guy's argument makes sense.

I don't see anything changing jews are behind the feminist movement and they run the world big brother style

[ - ] Notevenonce 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 07:58:14 ago (+1/-0)

Lot of holes in the argument

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 07:41:14 ago (+1/-0)

This was long had to stop and make 2 points.

I was a high school coach. There was a freshman girl probably 14 she was about 5 foot 7 and was absolutely stacked she would put 99% of women to shame giant perky tits good looking it was crazy.

I had to leave a pep rally because it was pajama day she wore some crazy shit and the male teachers were all stairing I told a female teacher someone should say something and get her a t-shirt or something. Nope nothing said or done.

bad decisions in relationships. Actually they make BETTER choices than

Absolutely correct... they base their decisions on genetics not money or power

Short fat rich bald dudes have no chance with girls until they are rich...

[ - ] Notevenonce 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 07:56:34 ago (+1/-0)

bad decisions in relationships. Actually they make BETTER choices than

than what?

[ - ] CoronaHoax 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 08:21:52 ago (+1/-0)

Historically I’ve seen the best significant other most people have in their lives was their first one. Literally all my old friends their first was their best. Gotten in the teens.

[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 08:24:06 ago (+1/-0)

best significant other was the first one

did they stay with them?

[ - ] Althea 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 09:09:03 ago (+1/-0)

I started dating my husband when I was 17 and he was 18. So thankful we have made it over 20 years. It is so rare where we live.

[ - ] kingofhearts [op] -1 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 10:01:17 ago (+0/-1)

If feminist and jews had it their way he'd be in prison and on a list for the rest of his life forever labeled a monster.

[ - ] Althea 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 22:57:04 ago (+0/-0)

Because I was a "minor"? Yeah, pretty ridiculous considering the age gap was not so big.
The laws now in (I think) CA are fucking disgusting- where people can date a minor if they're within 10 years (aka, a 14 year old and a 24 year old... gross.)

[ - ] Sleazy 2 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 06:32:01 ago (+2/-0)

nobody thinks a 14 year old is a fully formed female human

[ - ] kingofhearts [op] -1 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 09:59:02 ago (+0/-1)

Yes a 14 year old is still developing into an adult woman but they are far from children. At age 14 girls have been fertile since about 11 or 12 and their bodies are already very close to those of grown women. A woman reaches full fertility around age 13 and it starts to slowly decline around age 25.

[ - ] boekanier 2 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:19:20 ago (+2/-0)

I thought young pretty chicks are specialized in the seduction of older men, provided they have the necessary money to guarantee them a luxurious life

[ - ] Gowithit 2 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:16:54 ago (+2/-0)

maybe naivete is attractive? to some? im not a fan of useless people.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:31:30 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Gowithit 6 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:15:10 ago (+6/-0)

i've never seen an attractive 13 year old.

[ - ] texasblood 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 08:12:01 ago (+0/-0)

I did when I was 12 and I fucked her

[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 08:12:56 ago (+1/-0)

We were not raised the same.

[ - ] boekanier -1 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:20:17 ago (+0/-1)

you mean they are too skinny? (lol)

[ - ] Gowithit 3 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:23:08 ago (+3/-0)

more awkward then anything. They dont start filling into their looks until about 16-19.

[ - ] texasblood 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 20:13:01 ago (+0/-0)

My great,greats were married by 15yrs old,my grandmother was married at 16 and pops went to war at 17.
No doubt we ain't the same leather,few of my kind,my age left.

[ - ] kingofhearts [op] -1 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:42:00 ago (+0/-1)

Scientific studies have been done with totally random people. ALL 3 of them showed that people find girls of age 14 most attractive and not adult women. That shows clearly that if men had the right to choose freely without any moral, societal and legal pressure, then young teen girls would be their most desired choice.

[ - ] jfroybees 3 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:49:39 ago (+3/-0)

All this makes me wonder is who participated in ALL 3 studies and how many people were used in each study. Cite the studies. All I know is if a grown man had molested my daughter when she was 14, he would still be missing to this day.

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 09:34:22 ago (+1/-0)

Finding a 14 year old 'the most attractive' is plausible, but that doesn't equal wanting to have anything to do with a 14 year old. Being a parent or some kind of teacher are about the only legitimate reasons to tolerate a 14 year old.

[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 03:42:52 ago (+0/-0)

were they told the age beforehand?

[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 13:11:30 ago (+0/-0)

That would defeat the purpose of the study, would it not? Although, I'm not sure such a study exists, but who knows, maybe it does. I love when people reference "studies" without ever actually referencing any studies.

[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 04:49:30 ago (+0/-0)

i found a study where the age was shown and there was a difference when the same "target" was labelled as younger vs older.

research shows men just like lower values.

get it? hahaha

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking -1 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 10:17:46 ago (+0/-1)

"Studies show ..." Fuck off, perv.