Gasses follow the same laws as liquid fluids. Gravity pulls them towards the Earth's center of mass. If the atmospheric pressure requires a container, the pressure would be equal throughout the dome. Our atmosphere does not maintain an equal pressure. Atmospheric pressure drops as we go further from Earth.
The theory of gravity has nothing to do with gas or liquid flow. This is due to buoyant force and density. We can showcase this within experiments that always require a physical barrier to contain the gasses. At no point has anyone ever showcased gas pressure without physical containment. Gas molecules will seperate themselves within the container depending on their relative density gradient until the system is compressed to such a degree that none of the gas molecules can no longer compress, this is when the pressure is uniform and this is not what we experience. We live in an enclosed system that isnt being compressed. A physical barrier is nescassary and the theory of gravity doesnt hold up.
If it's buoyancy then how do objects always know which way to fall? If it was buoyancy keeping us on the Earth when you throw a ball into the air the ball would have an equal chance to go in any direction. Could fly laterally in reference to the Earth, could fly further up, who knows?
Since the ball will always fall towards Earth after it loses its upward momentum, it's not buoyancy keeping objects on the Earth.
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 16:01:26 ago (+1/-0)
There is a downward electric gradient on the earth. Every meter you gain in altitude, you experience a 100 volt gain in potential. The earth is.... get this... ground, in an electrical circuit.
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 16:52:03 ago (+1/-0)
When you throw a ball up into the air the ball is experiencing a voltage increase as it ascends, the relative density of the ball in the medium in which it exists combined with the electric differential causes the ball to seek equilibrium within the medium of the density/electric gradient, thus the ball descends.
Not just a voltage increase but a density gradient formed by all gas molecules. If you fill the ball with enough helium then it will continue to rise until either it reaches the layer that helium resides in the atmos or the ball pops.
Also how pressure will increase in our enclosed system that is relieved through thunderstorms on average 40,000 times per day across our flat and level plane. Electricity, buoyance, density and magnetism all interconnect in ways we are still figuring out.
Why does this same ball gain a charge if thrown laterally then?
The second part; voltage does kill you especially if you are getting cooked alive with the amount of electromagnetic waves you're claiming things to be absorbing/maintaining. Voltage can kill you, stop misinforming people through your ignorance.
In a contained space like a domed lid over a flat plane, gasses would fill the maximum volume until an equilibrium is met, why would the air thin as we raise our elevation in a flat earth, pressurized dome? According to your physisics, the atmosphere would be completely balanced and have equal density or their would be no pressure. Remember, you tell everyone that gravity doesn't exist, and that space would suck the air right off a globe Earth.
That child's toy you showed us will increase the temperature inside that globe, you know why you don't feel the temperature change much? The globe is filled with gas that doesn't transfer heat energy well, on top of the glass globe acting as a thermal insulator as well. In normal atmospheric conditions you'd need about 10kV to jump a one inch gap between conductors. The gas used in that kids toy is not as resistive to electrical energy, it is to heat though. Hence why those toys don't reach dangerous temperatures.
Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions? Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator? Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles? Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy? Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques? Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator? Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth? Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative? Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”? Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented? If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.” If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth? A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist? Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth? Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up? The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives? What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year? How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle. Why does the North Star goes to the horizon? Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres? Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south? If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form? If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath? Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye? How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere? * Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
A carpenter does not observe the lights in the ceiling in order to measure the ground.
Every single observation on the celestials above us comes down to perspective and relative position across our flat and level Earth.
There is no sphere, there is no detectable curvature and if the Earth was a sphere it would have to have continous curvature with absolutely no changes in elevation and topography.
This whole thing stinks like "Intelligent Design". Flat earthers picking little "gaps" to attack and claim it proves a grandiose, yet ultimately, un-provable theorem. Saying incredibly short-sighted things like "If I evolved from apes, why are there still apes in the world?"
Here, let me come up with a few that can be used:
"If all observable planets are spherical, where do irregular asteroids come from?"
"Why don't birds fly straight into space if the earth is curved?"
Why would studying the recessed can-lights in the ceiling tell you anything about the floor layout of the home? meaning; why would the shape of lights in the sky have anything to do with the shape of the earth? This logically does not follow.
Only as much as you're ignoring your own senses. Do you believe in empiricism? What shape is the horizon, flat or curved, A or B? Kikes breath oxygen too, you gonna stop breathing?
It’s no coincidence that kikes started pushing flat earth the same time forcing sects of Christianity to adopt Noahide laws and other Talmudic behaviors.
The Earth appears flat near it’s surface - and CURVED at higher altitudes. If you enjoy empirical evidence, why do you deny all the proof taken above 10.7 km?
I was also an ignorant moron who believed that the Earth was perfectly spherical. It’s more like an egg - are you intentionally omitting this incredibly important idea from your “simple math” argument?
I was also an ignorant moron who believed that the Earth was perfectly spherical. It’s more like an egg - are you intentionally omitting this incredibly important idea from your “simple math” argument?
You dismissed the entire topic, that's your cope. I got my answer in your first comment, I was making it clear to everyone else since you always fail to be direct and honest.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 16:03:10 ago (+3/-2)
Gas pressure requires a container, level describes a horizontally flat surface and not a theoretically impossible point on a sphere.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:21:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:28:25 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 15:56:47 ago (+0/-0)
Since the ball will always fall towards Earth after it loses its upward momentum, it's not buoyancy keeping objects on the Earth.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 16:01:26 ago (+1/-0)
The earth is.... get this... ground, in an electrical circuit.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 16:46:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 16:52:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 18:05:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 17:22:16 ago (+0/-0)
How do birds manage this charge without dying from getting cooked by the electromagnetic waves?
Why does the air get colder as we rise in elevation, while electromagnetism makes objects hotter?
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 17:55:31 ago (+1/-1)
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_09.html#:~:text=On%20an%20ordinary%20day%20over%20flat%20desert%20country%2C,field%20%24FLPE%24%20of%20%24100%24%20volts%2Fm%20in%20the%20air.
A voltage increase won't kill you, current flow does.
https://www.scienceabc.com/humans/how-many-volts-amps-kill-you-human.html
My initial thinking is because of the density gradient there are less molecules to hold on to any heat. (related, look up 'thermal derating')
Voltage increase doesn't really do much for temperature. Current flow does.
Ever played with of these as a child
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 18:03:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 27, 2024 08:32:40 ago (+0/-0)
The second part; voltage does kill you especially if you are getting cooked alive with the amount of electromagnetic waves you're claiming things to be absorbing/maintaining. Voltage can kill you, stop misinforming people through your ignorance.
In a contained space like a domed lid over a flat plane, gasses would fill the maximum volume until an equilibrium is met, why would the air thin as we raise our elevation in a flat earth, pressurized dome? According to your physisics, the atmosphere would be completely balanced and have equal density or their would be no pressure. Remember, you tell everyone that gravity doesn't exist, and that space would suck the air right off a globe Earth.
That child's toy you showed us will increase the temperature inside that globe, you know why you don't feel the temperature change much? The globe is filled with gas that doesn't transfer heat energy well, on top of the glass globe acting as a thermal insulator as well. In normal atmospheric conditions you'd need about 10kV to jump a one inch gap between conductors. The gas used in that kids toy is not as resistive to electrical energy, it is to heat though. Hence why those toys don't reach dangerous temperatures.
Keep trying though!
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil -1 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 18:05:57 ago (+1/-2)
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”? Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
* Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:14:26 ago (+2/-1)
Every single observation on the celestials above us comes down to perspective and relative position across our flat and level Earth.
There is no sphere, there is no detectable curvature and if the Earth was a sphere it would have to have continous curvature with absolutely no changes in elevation and topography.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] -1 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:35:45 ago (+1/-2)
That means you both got your info from the same youtuber or TikTok faggot OR, one of you is copying the other.
Which is it?
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:42:45 ago (+1/-0)
It's called learning. I witnessed that analogy being used, and to great effect.
Look how whiny it has you.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:53:19 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:55:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil -2 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:33:55 ago (+1/-3)
So you can’t answer any of the questions, got it. Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:43:23 ago (+1/-0)
Prove it.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:11:10 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:14:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 17:06:05 ago (+1/-1)
Here, let me come up with a few that can be used:
"If all observable planets are spherical, where do irregular asteroids come from?"
"Why don't birds fly straight into space if the earth is curved?"
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:12:36 ago (+1/-1)
meaning; why would the shape of lights in the sky have anything to do with the shape of the earth?
This logically does not follow.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:17:57 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:22:12 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:52:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:56:23 ago (+1/-0)
Observe; that they're lights that nobody has ever gone to...
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:05:17 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:06:43 ago (+1/-0)
This is a logical fallacy you have yet to have addressed.
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 16:13:58 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:11:13 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 00:33:04 ago (+0/-0)
You being a shill?
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 01:30:19 ago (+0/-1)
Kikes breath oxygen too, you gonna stop breathing?
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 04:49:30 ago (+0/-0)
The Earth appears flat near it’s surface - and CURVED at higher altitudes. If you enjoy empirical evidence, why do you deny all the proof taken above 10.7 km?
https://i.sstatic.net/Mxsv1.jpg
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 11:08:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 26, 2024 11:35:28 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMV6_ZCp8_s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzmjDFv23Ng
Free yourself from the kike ba'al-earth indoctrination.
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 7 monthsOct 27, 2024 01:44:59 ago (+0/-0)
Flat earthers have less sense than a jew in geometry class!
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 27, 2024 01:49:17 ago (+0/-0)
I know all the derision and mocking because I was the same ignorant asshole you're being until I woke up to the truth.
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 7 monthsOct 27, 2024 07:06:03 ago (+0/-0)
Tisk tisk, shithead!
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 7 monthsOct 27, 2024 12:52:59 ago (+0/-1)
So, you're still a moron.. Thanks for the update.
I accept your resignation of defeat.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 15:38:07 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:15:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:22:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:37:12 ago (+1/-1)
You can't refute what it proves, so you dismiss it.
Ignorance is strength, I read that in a book!
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:41:26 ago (+1/-0)
You asked a loaded question and I gave you an honest response.
You didn't ask for a refutation, you asked for an opinion
Maybe show a little good faith instead of acting like a petulant child for not getting the exact wording you were expecting.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:55:34 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:57:21 ago (+1/-0)
You asked for our 'cope', dumbass.
I answered directly and honestly. Everyone can read, besides you, apparently.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] -1 points 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 20:59:56 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsOct 25, 2024 21:01:06 ago (+1/-0)