Once you understand how jewish occultists insert symbolism and allegory into everything, Atwill's theory becomes basically undeniable. There are major parts of the gospels that really don't make sense any other way, like how every gospel has a different narrative about the discovery of Jesus' tomb where each character shows up at a different time and sees a different number of people in the tomb in each gospel.
[ - ] doginventer [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 05:24:14 ago (+1/-0)
Funny way to say that the gospels are consistent with all untainted witness testimony. Ask any detective and they will tell you that exact agreement of testimony between witnesses speaks of collusion and that apparent inconsistencies can even turn out to be validations in themselves.
Atwill is clearly the one inserting symbolism and allegory and yet provides no credible sources for any of it. Perhaps you can help with providing sources for his assertions?
His sources are the gospels and Josephus' writing which very clearly parallel each other. The video is only a brief summary, read the book and you'll find a fuckton of evidence.
You probably think the 9/11 symbolism in Back to the Future is just "conjecture". You probably think Saturn symbolism and golem symbolism in tons of major media franchises is just "conjecture". You probably think dozens of examples of predictive programming about covid are just "conjecture". You probably think celebrities making illuminati/masonic hand signals all the time is just "conjecture".
That's how symbolism works. They tell you without telling you. You notice the metric fuckton of parallels between different things and that's how you recognize it. Nobody comes out and tells you that the parallels are there because the fucking point is for it to be hidden and only noticeable if you look for it. Stop being fucking retarded.
No, having looked into them I don’t think those examples are conjecture, now you show the symbolism that shows you why you believe that the Flavian dynasty colluded with the Herodian dynasty to portray themselves as the murderers of the son of God. Then you might want to look in to how they might have achieved inserting the tale into the lived reality of not only the surviving witnesses, but also the rest of the known world where very large numbers of people of many races had already been suffering great persecution at the hands of the Jews and the Romans for being willing to stand their ground against the Pharisees and Emperor cults, and large numbers of non believers had witnessed all this. Then ask yourself; if the religion was invented to make people passive servants of Rome why did they have to continually murder vast numbers of those holding the faith even long after they had invented their own paganised version of it and used their totalitarian rulership to enforce it for more than a thousand years.
The Flavians colluded with Josephus to create a religion that the Flavians believed would pacify the jews while Josephus believed it would subvert Rome. Portraying themselves as the murderers of the fictional "son of god" was not the point, using religion as a tool for social and political control was.
The first pope that there are actual historical records of was a member of the Flavian family. Hardly an oppressed religious movement when the leader of their cult was a member of the ruling family.
The claims that christians were being murdered in vast numbers is ridiculous. There is no contemporary historical evidence for it and plenty of evidence that christians behaved like modern antifa, smashing statues and burning temples and oppressing Pagans.
Untold opposition? Constantine, Charlemagne, and Tryggvason all spread christianity by force, torturing and killing those who refused to convert, and all of them put jews in power over finance. Pagan societies were far more resistant to jewish subversion than christian societies that let jews convert and infiltrate.
Constantine, Charlemagne, and Tryggvason all spread <paganised babylonian >christianity by force, torturing and killing those who refused to convert, and all of them put jews in power over finance.
The pagan societies by and large couldn’t resist the Roman military (not a gospel directive) or didn’t resist because all they had to do was pretend that their pagan practices and holy days were now ‘christianised’, as is the Roman way. This is also why those who have the testimony of Jesus the messiah, and who follow the commandments of God have been persecuted by Rome for 2,000 years.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 04:55:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 05:24:14 ago (+1/-0)
Atwill is clearly the one inserting symbolism and allegory and yet provides no credible sources for any of it. Perhaps you can help with providing sources for his assertions?
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 13:04:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 13:44:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 14:07:33 ago (+0/-0)
That's how symbolism works. They tell you without telling you. You notice the metric fuckton of parallels between different things and that's how you recognize it. Nobody comes out and tells you that the parallels are there because the fucking point is for it to be hidden and only noticeable if you look for it. Stop being fucking retarded.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 14:28:56 ago (+0/-0)
Then you might want to look in to how they might have achieved inserting the tale into the lived reality of not only the surviving witnesses, but also the rest of the known world where very large numbers of people of many races had already been suffering great persecution at the hands of the Jews and the Romans for being willing to stand their ground against the Pharisees and Emperor cults, and large numbers of non believers had witnessed all this.
Then ask yourself; if the religion was invented to make people passive servants of Rome why did they have to continually murder vast numbers of those holding the faith even long after they had invented their own paganised version of it and used their totalitarian rulership to enforce it for more than a thousand years.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 14:31:53 ago (+0/-0)
The first pope that there are actual historical records of was a member of the Flavian family. Hardly an oppressed religious movement when the leader of their cult was a member of the ruling family.
The claims that christians were being murdered in vast numbers is ridiculous. There is no contemporary historical evidence for it and plenty of evidence that christians behaved like modern antifa, smashing statues and burning temples and oppressing Pagans.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 15:02:08 ago (+0/-0)
Do tell.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 15:10:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 15:28:35 ago (+0/-0)
The pagan societies by and large couldn’t resist the Roman military (not a gospel directive) or didn’t resist because all they had to do was pretend that their pagan practices and holy days were now ‘christianised’, as is the Roman way.
This is also why those who have the testimony of Jesus the messiah, and who follow the commandments of God have been persecuted by Rome for 2,000 years.