×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
30

Did they tattoo those numbers on their own arms?

submitted by Puller_of_Noses to AskUpgoat 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 20:26:36 ago (+30/-0)     (AskUpgoat)

A) What's the point in tracking them if you're going to "gas and incinerate" them?
B) They are, by their own words and deeds, masters of deception. (see Mossad motto)
C) A number tattoo was a free pass to enter many foreign nations under "persecution" status.
D) All the numbers are in the same range of a "scary" 5 or 6 digits.
E) They all look like they were done by the same traveling rabbi at synagogues in eastern Europe with a cheap buzz needle and a pocketful of ink.

They probably put those tattoos on themselves to promote their victim narrative.


20 comments block


[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 21:01:48 ago (+0/-0)

Came in thinking this is a bait post.

I do believe that the numbers were generated by IBM hardware. Yes teh idea was to make them accountable for their actions.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 06:36:40 ago (+0/-0)*

It was only done with those with useful skills for the war effort. When they were transferred to another camp that needed particular skills, they were tattooed in order to make sure the correct person with the particular skill showed up. The Germans were well aware of how jew lie as naturally as breathing, and if they weren't physically marked, it would have been easy for someone to take another person's identity for whatever reason.

EDIT: I retract what I said. The Germans didn't tattoo anyone. Please see my comment about CW Porter.

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/tattoo1.htm

[ - ] shitface9000 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 03:10:54 ago (+0/-0)

The ink should not be legible after all that time

[ - ] SteppingRazor 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 12:21:55 ago (+0/-0)

I recently saw a comic about some exterminator numbering the bugs before they killed them. The other guy was saying ‘why would you spend all that time numbering them if you’re just going to kill them?’
I’ll have to try to find that one again, should have saved it.

[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 06:18:43 ago (+1/-0)

That tattoo number was a record of funds in their Warburg Bank account.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 06:57:45 ago (+1/-0)*

Folks, read this. This is pretty definitive. This fellow doesn't believe the Germans tattooed anyone, and I'm beginning to think he's right.

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/tattoo1.htm

As anyone here who has ever receive a tattoo, it's like minor surgery and requires wound care. Plus, you can't re-use the needle until it's been sterilized unless you want to spread blood-borne diseases throughout the camp.

I was reading about tattooing in the Holocaust Deprogramming Course (no longer on line as a web site, but you can find it at archive.org). There is a link to a site by a fellow named CW Porter, which is no longer active, but his content is now part of JR's Books Online, a terrific resource for books we all need and read.

JR is pretty generous about sharing digital copies, but sales of physical books helps keep his site going, so buy some books from him and keep him going.

[ - ] SteppingRazor 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 12:20:43 ago (+1/-0)

Is this the deprogramming site you mentioned? I’ve had it bookmarked for a while. Porter is mentioned multiple times there.
https://radiochristianity.com/holocaust-deprogramming-course/

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 6 monthsOct 31, 2024 05:44:51 ago (+0/-0)

I'm sorry, I overlooked your comment. Yes, that's what I was talking about. The original site is gone, but it's been archived all over the place, including at archive.org.

https://archive.org/details/holo-deprogramming-course_202212/page/n3/mode/2up

I recommend everyone save a copy and read it. There's a LOT in there and it's a useful reference tool.

[ - ] Stonkmar 0 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 10:58:11 ago (+0/-0)

Bringing back OG internet with that site.

[ - ] green_man 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 10:20:00 ago (+1/-0)

F) There is no describable standard tattoo location.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 3 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 21:24:39 ago (+3/-0)

If anyone living has a tattoo, he definitely did it himself. If he was 20 in 1945, that would make him 99 today. Just remember that anyone who was actually in a camp is now dead.

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 1 point 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 23:21:57 ago (+1/-0)

What if someone was 2 in 1945? Wouldn’t they be 80?

[ - ] Panic 2 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 09:44:35 ago (+2/-0)

Tattoos on an infant would grow larger as the infant grew larger. In adulthood, it would already be a fading mess.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 06:32:54 ago (+1/-0)*

Yes, but not everyone was tattooed, only those with useful skills who were sent to different camps where there was a labor shortage in particular skills. That was the entire purpose of assigning people numbers, so that their work skills could be used for the war effort. A two-year old would never have been tattooed.

EDIT: I retract what I said. The Germans didn't tattoo anyone. Please see my comment about CW Porter.

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/tattoo1.htm

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 4 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 02:47:57 ago (+4/-0)

Yes they did tattoo themselves.

Look at photos from concentration camps, no tattoos anywhere except for a handful of individual people explicitly showing them off. There's none to be seen in group photos of prisoners and photos before liberation.

The numbers also don't seem to follow any standards. For example in some photos, some tattoos start with A- then numbers, while others are just numbers. Feel like the Germans would have had a numbering system in place standard throughout the camps. But why would you use a system of ID that would have been so easy for the camp inmates to alter or falsify as well? We know there were prisoners in the camps doing tattoos.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 3 points 6 monthsOct 24, 2024 06:38:45 ago (+3/-0)*

They only tattooed prisoners with valuable skills needed for the war effort. It was common to transfer prisoners to different camps where their skills were needed.

EDIT: I retract what I said. The Germans didn't tattoo anyone. Please see my comment about CW Porter.

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/tattoo1.htm

[ - ] PostWallHelena 7 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 20:37:15 ago (+7/-0)

I think they did. I dont think anyone tattooed any of these prisoners.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 6 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 20:56:53 ago (+6/-0)

That's an interesting theory. Definitely one worth exploring and the reasons they'd do that. Obviously for some type of victim status. I don't think even they could've anticipated the run they'd have with the whole holohoax. I'm actually surprised they haven't thought up a new holy day to celebrate how long they've been getting away with it!

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 6 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 20:59:55 ago (+6/-0)

Niggers haven't figured out how to get gibs this long on one grift. Haha yeah I guess they have! RAYSIS!

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 9 points 6 monthsOct 23, 2024 23:19:54 ago (+9/-0)

As precise as the Germans were at everything they did, should we accept roughly scribbled, misplaced numbers on random forearms?