If you observe that advances in a specific fields (such as GPU capabilities) rapidly accelerate progress in others, you can expect increasingly intertwined technological developments, challenging traditional skill silos.
"AI" shifts from tool to collaborative partner. Chatbots to contextualize language interfaces. Action models execute the actvitiy. An area ripe for opportunity would be anything in the gravity of human-AI symbiosis. New tool adapts collaboration strategies.
The abstract thinking produces adaptable professionals. Supporting development frameworks may need to prioritize abstract thinking, creative problem-solving, and continuous learning.
Anecdotally, does this shed us from our current technological dark ages?
Which is why my observation is predicated on those who choose to take advantage of it with abstract thinking, creative problem solving, and continuous learning.
The machine learning is just a tech stack. It's been around since the 80's, maybe before.
The people programming the machine, are literally automating themselves out of existence by improving the machine to the point where it makes them obsolete (matter of if, not when).
Current neuron simulating AI which is the dominating the news in the last 2 years does the exact same thing your brain does so if you don't think AI has any intelligence then you have to recognize that the brain has no intelligence. Now I have no argument with that consistent an argument. If you want to say that everything you think is creative is actually just a modification of a previous pre-programmed response then fine. But it is what we call intelligence today.
Current neuron simulating AI which is the dominating the news in the last 2 years does the exact same thing your brain does
Untrue. While the principle at play that is being used to contextualize language is a simulated neural network, we are very far away from actually simulating the brain in any realistic capacity. Instead, we virtualize in the truest sense by emulating the synaptic connections and their results in digital form as best we can.
"AI" as we call it, is a misnomer. It's a powerful, advanced, machine learning algorithm that is tooled and tuned to contextualize human speech.
We don't even have the ability to map 100% of the brain today, suggesting it's illogical we would have the ability to synthesize a brain with computers. We do our best to emulate, but it's imperfect.
100% mapping of the human brain and it's function, combined with 100% synthetic digital human brain, would probably lead to the true "singularity" level of intelligence (not just faux intelligence like we have today).
At that point, well.. it's over for humanity's current era of advancement. I believe we become house pets in that moment, and can only hope we have a benevolent master in the artificial mind controlled future.
When everyone was free to buy property, for whatever purpose they chose (landowners), no one could dictate what someone else did with their land.
When individuals could truly own and use their own property, there was no gap between their ideas and their implementation. Energy at the speed of thought.
Or, consider that in the previous status quo, in the relative time it would take to build a bridge, you now take longer simply to get permission to build a bridge.
Now consider, that the machine when tasked by the willing creative mind, can first be wielded to simply design a pattern of behavior that breaks the current system through influence of the general population.
Or, to put simply, you can choose to putz about online kicking dust in the air shitlording, while those with drive utilize these technologies against you (unlikely benevolently).. or you can use them first.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 3 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:16:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:20:46 ago (+1/-0)
Which is why my observation is predicated on those who choose to take advantage of it with abstract thinking, creative problem solving, and continuous learning.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 2 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:33:40 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 23:20:35 ago (+1/-0)
The machine learning is just a tech stack. It's been around since the 80's, maybe before.
The people programming the machine, are literally automating themselves out of existence by improving the machine to the point where it makes them obsolete (matter of if, not when).
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 03:20:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 04:33:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 09:16:48 ago (+1/-0)
Tomorrow, it will handle all of this itself. Only a matter of time, now.
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 09:16:17 ago (+0/-0)
Untrue. While the principle at play that is being used to contextualize language is a simulated neural network, we are very far away from actually simulating the brain in any realistic capacity. Instead, we virtualize in the truest sense by emulating the synaptic connections and their results in digital form as best we can.
"AI" as we call it, is a misnomer. It's a powerful, advanced, machine learning algorithm that is tooled and tuned to contextualize human speech.
We don't even have the ability to map 100% of the brain today, suggesting it's illogical we would have the ability to synthesize a brain with computers. We do our best to emulate, but it's imperfect.
100% mapping of the human brain and it's function, combined with 100% synthetic digital human brain, would probably lead to the true "singularity" level of intelligence (not just faux intelligence like we have today).
At that point, well.. it's over for humanity's current era of advancement. I believe we become house pets in that moment, and can only hope we have a benevolent master in the artificial mind controlled future.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 15:24:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:29:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 23:18:49 ago (+0/-0)
Allow me to articulate.
When everyone was free to buy property, for whatever purpose they chose (landowners), no one could dictate what someone else did with their land.
When individuals could truly own and use their own property, there was no gap between their ideas and their implementation. Energy at the speed of thought.
Or, consider that in the previous status quo, in the relative time it would take to build a bridge, you now take longer simply to get permission to build a bridge.
Now consider, that the machine when tasked by the willing creative mind, can first be wielded to simply design a pattern of behavior that breaks the current system through influence of the general population.
Or, to put simply, you can choose to putz about online kicking dust in the air shitlording, while those with drive utilize these technologies against you (unlikely benevolently).. or you can use them first.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:21:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 22:22:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Stonkmar
[ - ] Stonkmar 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 07:58:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 22, 2024 09:12:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 0 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 21:20:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint
[ - ] HotBakedDinuMuffinSaint [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 21, 2024 21:30:23 ago (+0/-0)