Sign into an existing account

I like to break it down like this:

Are the good niggers doing everything they can to call out the disproportionate amount of bad being committed by the rest of the bad niggers? If the answer is no, then they all gotta go.

Until I see a tangible, concerted effort by blacks to hold other blacks accountable, then I view them all as a problem.

If there's even one White financing these jew and nigger and illegal shitskin antics under the false excuse of "but I have to pay income taxes"...

Is paying our ZOG enemy to oppress and genocide us a problem?

Things are complicated. I'll give you two reasons, neither of which provides us with an easy way of addressing it.

First, it is in the nature of 'good people' (which in part we take to mean rational) not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Suppose your family had a bad reputation in town, but you were not like them. Most people would think it unfair if you suffered all of the bad consequences of your family's bad reputation even if you really were not like them. Good people tend to be inclined to accepting a lot of distress (challenge, inconvenience, etc.) if it means getting the diamond out of the rough. We think it is worthwhile to struggle for the sake of not 'letting the good die'. We're also highly motivated by the archetype of the hero, and we tend to act as if some distress is worthwhile in order to produce society's heroes.

For that reason, most good people are not inclined to take the nuclear option if it means unjustly eradicating the diamonds while you eradicate the 'rough'. Say you have a child who produces several grandchildren. Just say there are four. If one of them is a gem, but the other three are awful, then if the only perceived options post hoc are (a) keep them all or (b) eradicate them all, good people will favor (a) for the sake of the diamond.

The second reason is that good people tend to be hopeful and optimistic. Rather than subscribe to fatalist stories, say, about how one group of people is 'all rotten', they'll sooner subscribe to a story that says there is something redeemable that, if we could only alter circumstances, would 'bear fruit'. This has to do with hope, but also with our good people's own auto-intoxication with guilt (this is a pro-social quality). Good people are very critical of their own badness, and so they think that if the world makes it possible, with hard work, to 'wash the blackmoor white' (to be redeemed of our sins), then we can all sacrifice a little more to bring everyone in our community up. Think of the Christian trope of the 'harrowing of hell'. Christ descends into hell to save the souls wandering there.

This inclines good people toward thinking that there is work we can do to help minorities become better.

So, this is your challenge. The good qualities, the ones we want to preserve and curate, are the same which make us vulnerable to the problems we are currently facing.

I'm inclined to think that our biggest problem is not racial differences, but is rather the parasite (a foe who is by nature irredeemable because it doesn't think it needs to be) who exploits the differences between races to push them further and further apart and break down their capacities for mitigating tensions. They make the problem worse and take away your solutions.

This parasite wants nothing more than for you to see your problem as the 'blackmoor' rather than to identify your problem as the parasite itself.

I think we spend too much time trying to convince people of the problem/solution that don't have a good grasp of logic (niggers, women, etc.) or have an agenda that simply doesn't care about the logic (jews, shitskins, corrupt politicians, etc.)

Niggers are other and should never be among us
jews are a lethal parasites that should be dealt with as such
Shitskins are a threat, but can and should be dealt with in a way that requires the fewest resources to reduce the threat to acceptable levels. They should not be living among us.

Most people think most niggers are “basically good people” and that some 5 or 10 percent are just bad because they were raised wrong or whatever. As if they were in a seperate category.

But black people (and whites) are on a bell curve distribution for antisocial behavior, just like with IQ. Their entire population is shifted toward the antisocial end of the spectrum. They wont all be muggers and gang bangers. But many more of them will litter or cut in line or not tip a waitress compared to the white distribution. Its not just crime. Its a whole grab bag of thoughtless and selfish behaviors that make cities like Detroit and Newark unliveable.

People need to understand population distributions that can be characterized by averages and standard deviations. Statistics are real information and should not be disregarded in favor of positive attitudes. People think “Im a good person if I keep a positive attitude about the racially integrated society.” Its irrational thinking. Its a religious like notion— magical thinking that niggers will stop nigging if you think happy thoughts about them.

It's brainwashing. Pet negroes are a thing.