They were not "removed" from the Bible because prior to the Council of Nicea, there was only ONE Bible, the one compiled by Marcion of Sinope. It was a process and a debate in the fourth century that created a canon of accepted scripture. Nothing was removed, they were only left out because they were not accepted as truth.
"Nothing was removed, they were only left out" is typical kike pilpul- The point IS that what was considered 'canon' was changed, hence scripture was (and still is) withheld from the masses.
There was no consensus on what was canon. Different factions had their own tenets, and it was the purpose of the Councils to standardize and orthodoxy. Before that time, nothing was canon. Those books that were rejected deserved it because they were mostly ridiculous, like the Jesus infancy gospels. Unless you're trying to defend that nonsense as canon and inspired of God.
But hey, believe whatever you want. Glad you got it all figured out.
[ + ] inaminit
[ - ] inaminit 1 point 7 monthsOct 9, 2024 08:55:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 7 monthsOct 9, 2024 09:55:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] inaminit
[ - ] inaminit 0 points 7 monthsOct 9, 2024 15:12:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 0 points 7 monthsOct 9, 2024 20:51:59 ago (+0/-0)
But hey, believe whatever you want. Glad you got it all figured out.