The Giants were before the flood and destroyed in the flood except for two giants a giant family and they were hunted down and killed. Worthless trash doesn't know his ancient history.
Middle eastern people who wrote the Bible were probably relatively short but the middle east was regularly experiencing immigration from groups with higher northern eurasian DNA. Having read some of the “giant” passages in the Bible, I would speculate that people with “steppe herder” ancestry were settling in the levant along side people with more natufian ancestry who were shorter. Some of these people might have been Mycenaeans who have been hypothesized to be the infamous “sea peoples” and the ancestors of the Philistines (see goliath).
Also traditions of giants in European myth may have been from a period when people of high steppe herder ancestry were invading lands previously occupied by Early European Farmers who were shorter and originally from Anatolia. These two groups eventually mixed to become modern Europeans.
These were not true giants. 5’9” seems really tall to a 5’4” guy.
I think there was a race of giant red-headed people. They just couldn't sustain themselves with the hordes of ultra-violent humans running around. The last ones may have been killed by the redskins.
For whatever jewish reason historians love to 'lose' large skeletons and skulls. Several are known to have existed before they were 'lost' by some museum or whatever.
At some point there obviously was a race of red headed people. They were probably bigger than average. There is no way they were 7 feet tall or 12 feet tall on average as some of these videos claim. It doesn’t seem like people that size are compatible with survival over the long term. There are some health issues with being that big.
Archeologist lose all kinds of things over the decades. I don’t think this is a conspiracy. The archeologist that could produce a 10 foot tall set of remains would be world famous. I think these claims are scams tbh. Weve got a lot of ancient skeletons from around 50,000 years ago and onward which can be verified as ancestral to whites. And some of them are relatively big. Giants compared to other groups. But not giants to us.
Archeology is fake and gay. Anyway, there is a lot of documentation on giant skeletons, especially in America. You sure have had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo of ScienceTM lately.
Archeology is fake and gay. ......You sure have had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo of ScienceTM lately.
I think that like all areas of science, the archeological establishment is corruptible and biased. Having said that, I try to read up on “mainstream” archeology trends and to know what the current consensus is on topics relevant to recent human evolution, and I inspect those theories sceptically.
What I dont believe is that all of acheology is a conspiracy. Just like I don’t think all of virology is a conspiracy or all of physics is a conspriracy. Those fields are too big and varied for their established beliefs to be completely false or a “psyop”. There are trends within it that are corrupt. But I don’t dismiss all of archeology with the wave of my hand as too jewed to produce anything true. Thats not how institutional capture works frankly.
To insist that all of mainstream science is kiked and not worth regarding is simplistic. That thinking leads to flattardism— i.e. you can’t trust any mainstream consensus, no matter how basic and proven. The reality is much more complex. You have to pore over a research subject and determine which theories are likely to be true and which are likely to be false (politicized) and which ideas you are not able to assess correctly because you don’t have enough information.
With a subject like archeology, theres a lot of unknowns. Theres alot of politicization. It’s a soft science. There’s also a high rate of consensus turnover, so I take “accepted” theories with a very large dose of salt. But what I don’t think is happening is a bunch of jewish archeologists hiding giant gentile skulls in a basement somewhere because “muh fascism”. That is not how this sort of academic corruption works.
This has been more or less my position on scientific subjects since I started using vote 6 or 7 years ago. I can point you to many disagreements I have had with goats where Im in the minority and accused of being “jewish” or a fed plant, e.g. covid. That’s nothing new. “Science is fake an gay” is just as stupid as “Trust the science” — they are just two extremes that appeal to people that like fairy tales and don’t want to read boring scientific literature to form their own opinions. I don’t form my scientific opininons on this site because theres not very much good scientific thinking going on here.
Anyway I bring as much skepticism to Robert Sepehr videos as I do to David Reich papers. If these bitchute fags can’t point to some scholarly systematic analysis of these skulls what evidence do I have to believe that they exist? Every time Ive looked for some academic basis for these claims it leads me to crackpot sites that deal in fraudulent low IQ shit like space aliens.
The fact is that archeology has produced alot of information that leads to right wing conclusions about human nature and human history. The establishment just misinterprets and underreports these facts. They don’t cover them up. Not typically anyway. “Ancient Giants” is a con, imo. I don’t see a shred of reputable transparent science associated with it. If Ive missed something, please show me. I think theres nothing cogent on this subject because I would have seen it by now.
There are interesting controversies brewing within archeology, but you have to be willing to read the mainstream research to know about them.
The most “african” africans are the pygmy and the khoi-sans. They are still hunter gatherers. Other groups like West African/Bantu peoples have a suprising amount of Eurasian DNA from the pre-historic periods when farmers and pastoralists were expanding out of the middle east. The Masaai of East Africa are really tall pastoralists that are like 30 or 40 percent middle eastern. (See Mota Man) The average person does not understand how Eurasianized the average african is. But the old (tiny) african hunter gatherer population was largely replaced by (larger) half-breeds with farming and pastoralism . Thats why the pygmies and Khoi-san have the lowest IQs in africa. Most africans are infact patrilineally middle eastern (Y haplogroup E) whereas pygmies, khoi-san have the indigenous haplogroups A and B.
Pastoralism also seems to be an economy that breeds tall people. I don’t know if its the meat diet or selection of individuals who can handle animals or fight better (pastoralists are violent). The ancient European hunter gatherers like Aurignacians and Gravettians hunted big game like mamoths. Some of these factors may also contribute to the selection of larger individuals. Maybe its contributing to the Bergmann phenomenon. Equatorial people are historically mostly veggie eaters. Compare that to eskimos who eat a 90% meat diet.
Theres something else called Allens rule which states that cold climates will favor stockier individuals. This is why northern euros tend to be big boned and barrel chested. Mediterraneans tend to have more gracile bone structure and so do africans. They have longer and thinner limbs. Northern Eurasians tend to have larger torsos proportionally. Im pretty thin but I do not have dainty fingers, wrists, ankles etc. I learned that that is typical for a northern eurpean and don’t feel so bad about it these days. I just think Im Aurignacian, lol.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 08:17:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 9000timesempty
[ - ] 9000timesempty 0 points 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 10:58:08 ago (+0/-0)
Worthless trash doesn't know his ancient history.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 10:32:21 ago (+0/-0)
So ancient Europeans developed to be very large. Aurignacians and Gravettians (male) were almost six foot on average. Compare that to African pygmies and Khoi san people. https://genomicatlas.org/2021/04/26/human-height-in-prehistoric-europe/
Middle eastern people who wrote the Bible were probably relatively short but the middle east was regularly experiencing immigration from groups with higher northern eurasian DNA. Having read some of the “giant” passages in the Bible, I would speculate that people with “steppe herder” ancestry were settling in the levant along side people with more natufian ancestry who were shorter. Some of these people might have been Mycenaeans who have been hypothesized to be the infamous “sea peoples” and the ancestors of the Philistines (see goliath).
Also traditions of giants in European myth may have been from a period when people of high steppe herder ancestry were invading lands previously occupied by Early European Farmers who were shorter and originally from Anatolia. These two groups eventually mixed to become modern Europeans.
These were not true giants. 5’9” seems really tall to a 5’4” guy.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 11:57:57 ago (+1/-0)
For whatever jewish reason historians love to 'lose' large skeletons and skulls. Several are known to have existed before they were 'lost' by some museum or whatever.
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 8 monthsSep 27, 2024 00:11:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 12:16:34 ago (+0/-1)
Archeologist lose all kinds of things over the decades. I don’t think this is a conspiracy. The archeologist that could produce a 10 foot tall set of remains would be world famous. I think these claims are scams tbh. Weve got a lot of ancient skeletons from around 50,000 years ago and onward which can be verified as ancestral to whites. And some of them are relatively big. Giants compared to other groups. But not giants to us.
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 8 monthsSep 29, 2024 09:02:11 ago (+0/-0)
Anyway, there is a lot of documentation on giant skeletons, especially in America.
You sure have had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo of ScienceTM lately.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 8 monthsSep 29, 2024 12:22:41 ago (+0/-0)
I think that like all areas of science, the archeological establishment is corruptible and biased. Having said that, I try to read up on
“mainstream” archeology trends and to know what the current consensus is on topics relevant to recent human evolution, and I inspect those theories sceptically.
What I dont believe is that all of acheology is a conspiracy. Just like I don’t think all of virology is a conspiracy or all of physics is a conspriracy. Those fields are too big and varied for their established beliefs to be completely false or a “psyop”. There are trends within it that are corrupt. But I don’t dismiss all of archeology with the wave of my hand as too jewed to produce anything true. Thats not how institutional capture works frankly.
To insist that all of mainstream science is kiked and not worth regarding is simplistic. That thinking leads to flattardism— i.e. you can’t trust any mainstream consensus, no matter how basic and proven. The reality is much more complex. You have to pore over a research subject and determine which theories are likely to be true and which are likely to be false (politicized) and which ideas you are not able to assess correctly because you don’t have enough information.
With a subject like archeology, theres a lot of unknowns. Theres alot of politicization. It’s a soft science. There’s also a high rate of consensus turnover, so I take “accepted” theories with a very large dose of salt. But what I don’t think is happening is a bunch of jewish archeologists hiding giant gentile skulls in a basement somewhere because “muh fascism”. That is not how this sort of academic corruption works.
This has been more or less my position on scientific subjects since I started using vote 6 or 7 years ago. I can point you to many disagreements I have had with goats where Im in the minority and accused of being “jewish” or a fed plant, e.g. covid. That’s nothing new. “Science is fake an gay” is just as stupid as “Trust the science” — they are just two extremes that appeal to people that like fairy tales and don’t want to read boring scientific literature to form their own opinions. I don’t form my scientific opininons on this site because theres not very much good scientific thinking going on here.
Anyway I bring as much skepticism to Robert Sepehr videos as I do to David Reich papers. If these bitchute fags can’t point to some scholarly systematic analysis of these skulls what evidence do I have to believe that they exist? Every time Ive looked for some academic basis for these claims it leads me to crackpot sites that deal in fraudulent low IQ shit like space aliens.
The fact is that archeology has produced alot of information that leads to right wing conclusions about human nature and human history. The establishment just misinterprets and underreports these facts. They don’t cover them up. Not typically anyway. “Ancient Giants” is a con, imo. I don’t see a shred of reputable transparent science associated with it. If Ive missed something, please show me. I think theres nothing cogent on this subject because I would have seen it by now.
There are interesting controversies brewing within archeology, but you have to be willing to read the mainstream research to know about them.
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 8 monthsSep 29, 2024 12:26:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 8 monthsSep 29, 2024 12:35:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 8 monthsSep 29, 2024 12:43:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 10:45:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 8 monthsSep 26, 2024 11:16:59 ago (+0/-0)
Pastoralism also seems to be an economy that breeds tall people. I don’t know if its the meat diet or selection of individuals who can handle animals or fight better (pastoralists are violent). The ancient European hunter gatherers like Aurignacians and Gravettians hunted big game like mamoths. Some of these factors may also contribute to the selection of larger individuals. Maybe its contributing to the Bergmann phenomenon. Equatorial people are historically mostly veggie eaters. Compare that to eskimos who eat a 90% meat diet.
Theres something else called Allens rule which states that cold climates will favor stockier individuals. This is why northern euros tend to be big boned and barrel chested. Mediterraneans tend to have more gracile bone structure and so do africans. They have longer and thinner limbs. Northern Eurasians tend to have larger torsos proportionally. Im pretty thin but I do not have dainty fingers, wrists, ankles etc. I learned that that is typical for a northern eurpean and don’t feel so bad about it these days. I just think Im Aurignacian, lol.