Sign into an existing account

Imagine how functional she could be if she just got off the sauce. This will decide the election. Just remember she won't show up every day as president sober. She might show up sober close to zero of them.

It is interesting how low the standard is to get hired as president vs a real job. I don't think any of these people could get hired anywhere. But Kamala shows up for something sober one time in her life and that decides she qualifies to be president.

Here is the opportunity to seize on. We accept reality and that Kamala will be president (or at this point is likely to be and there isn't much sway we on this tiny site can have). But we can spin why she won this debate. We might have enough influence to plant a seed.

She did answer better on Israel, both by the public's standards and our standards. Not perfect but better. We should claim that was the deciding factor and holding Israel to account works politically. That would be a fun take away to push out there, see what people do with it.

So you heard it here. Kamala won because Americans like politicians that tell Israel they need to follow rules. NPCs don't process whether something is true or not if it isn't offensive. NPCs are now off of Israel which is nice. This means they are more programmable than your past experiences with them would suggest. It's time to program them. Hack the system. If you say she won because... they will adopt your opinion, because they are all low information and will accept anything that is said confidently.

There is an interesting book I read called Made to Stick: https://heathbrothers.com/books/made-to-stick/

One thing it tells you is that NPCs don't process critically anything after the word because. They just accept it.

So "Kamala won because she was harder on Israel" is just true if you say it to an NPC whether that is or is not the primary reason. So just tell them that. Tell every NPC you know. And it will be as good as true.