×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
16

Why cancer rates were rare in the past but common today

submitted by didyouknow to TheEternalJew 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 18:31:38 ago (+18/-2)     (TheEternalJew)

Cancer has been intentionally induced by the jews to reduce the world population and make tons of money using a treatment they created for cancer, that is chemotherapy. Chemotherapy started as a research conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense (formerly known as Department of War) to create new chemical weapon agents using mustard gas. The person who set up the contract that led to this research was Milton C. Winternitz, a jew. The research later suddenly turned into a ''medical research'' involving using toxic chemical agents to 'treat' cancer. This research led to further research conducted by jews. One prominent example would be Sidney Farber, who is hailed as the 'father of chemotherapy'. It was Farber's fraudulent research that led to chemotherapy being the primary treatment for cancer. Chemotherapy was recognized early on that it was not only harmful to the body but ineffective against cancer but that didn't do anything because chemotherapy was not only making people sick and killing them off, but it was also making them a lot of money. Chemotherapy today is a billion dollar industry.

Chemotherapy targets all cells in the body, the only fighting it does against cancer is that because chemotherapy is such a toxin, it will also kill cancer cells as it does not discriminate. However chemotherapy does more harm than good. There's a few important alternatives that the body uses to combat the onset of cancer. Anytime a cell gets mutated, the cell will try to repair the damaged DNA before it divides, immune system cells will detect these mutated cells and eliminate them or mutated cell will have apoptosis (self-destruction) induced to kill itself off. Chemo targets the immune system, making one of these alternatives weaker and thus making the body more susceptible to getting new forms of cancer. This is why it's common with chemo to have the cancer come back and more aggressively.

Not all cells are able to divide to create new cells. We got nerve cells and heart cells that can not reproduce so any damage done to them will be permanent so guess what? Chemo targets these cells as well, this is why heart problems and neurological diseases happen with people who had chemo treatment. Also chemo weakens the persons cognitive functions, making them dumber.

This is what we still use as primary treatment for cancer today. Is it any wonder why people who treat cancer die off like flies? It was reported in one hospital in Britain that 50% of cancer patient died to chemo and NOT the cancer.

What is however effective against cancer and has shown consistently to be effective are fruits and vegetables that are rich in polyphenols. It's a chemical compound found prominently in plants and what gives them their color. In the past, people were more agricultural and grew their own food and did it on their own natural soil. Meaning no bullshit pesticides and no GMO. Polyphenols serves as a defense mechanism for these plants to protect them from pests. When using pesticides, that defense is lessened which means both the quantity and quality of polyphenols created by these plants will be lessened significantly thus making them less healthy which also means it lessens its anti-cancer effect.

Genetically modifying the plants to change their size and have them live longer will also cause negative changes to polyphenols and other natural chemical compounds that's beneficial to one's health.

Blueberries for example have been shown in studies to be highly effective against cancer because its polyphenol content. Polyphenol is an antioxidant and has also anti-inflammatory effects. Polyphenol has the ability to suppress the growth of cancer, it reduces the amount of oxygen and nutrients cancer cells get and are able to induce apoptosis on these cancer cells, all without harming a single healthy cell.

Turmeric is another example. Very rich in polyphenols with strong anti-cancer effects. Turmeric has the biggest bioavailability (meaning where it has the most effect) in the colon system of the body. Meaning it's effective against preventing and treating colon cancer. This is why despite how filthy the pajeets are have low colon cancer rates because they consume a lot of turmeric.

It makes sense why in the past as people were eating real natural food which naturally had properties that is effective against cancer would have much lower cancer rates compared to today.

And if we look at the diet of people today and how many things that are loaded with carcinogenic ingredients they consume, are we surprise to see how cancer is everywhere? The jews have turned it upside down.

Not to mention all the vaccines people inject today. Not to mention all the exposure to all forms of harmful chemicals in the air and also in the water we drink.

This is a practice that's happening all over the world. This shows that cancer rates today are there by design, by the orchestration of jews seeing how the society we have today is a society they created and that they run entirely. It wasn't the case 100 years ago, they had a lot of power back then but not totally. Thus society was run more rationally, especially in regards to diet.

And who was there to provide the solution to the very problem they created? the jews off course with their chemotherapy poison. Just take a look at how much money they've made by poisoning and killing of the non-jew...


16 comments block


[ - ] CHIRO 3 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 23:00:11 ago (+3/-0)

Yeah, but what do you do to treat existing cancer? Remember when Steve Jobs delayed medical treatment for his pancreatic cancer for close to a year because he wanted to use alternative medicine? Remember when he died?

[ - ] didyouknow [op] 1 point 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 02:36:13 ago (+1/-0)

Yes, but that was because he was offered surgery which could have gotten rid of the cancer. Surgery can be curative, especially when the cancer is found early on. But I am speaking about chemotherapy here.

For some, alternative medicine has helped, for others it does not. Everyone is a little different in terms of their bodies reaction to things and it also depends on the kind of cancer as well. But this is not the point, the point is how chemotherapy, a very harmful way of treating cancer has been the primary cancer treatment for decades despite its strong potential to do more damage than good, with the capability of killing the person before the cancer does.

There's been a suppression of progress when it comes to cancer treatment.

A lot of it has to do with research which focuses on finding alternative treatments do not get the support it needs to reach the clinical stages due to lack of financial support and bullshit regulations. For example research focusing on blueberries anti-cancer effects have been promising but haven't gone anywhere because of lack of support.

And seeing how chemotherapy is a billion dollar industry, you can see why the medical establishment aren't serious and eager when it comes to finding a safer and more effective method that can replace chemo as the main treatment for cancer.

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 1 point 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 22:05:02 ago (+1/-0)

I've heard a few stories about the introduction of plastic as a food container causing cancer.

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 23:04:14 ago (+0/-0)

Microplastics.
Reading plastics is in all our food and (if you drink from the plastic bottles) and all food is packaged in plastic. The microplastic fiber will absolutely absorb intoyour blood stream causing cardiovascular, cancerous types of diseases

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 10:50:55 ago (+0/-0)

I want to say I heard this on Art Bell or Jeff Rense like 20 years but once plastics were introduced en masse in the 50s cancer rates took off in the 70s until now.

[ - ] Stonkmar 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 20:29:21 ago (+0/-0)

sugar

[ - ] Badgeroo 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 01:38:41 ago (+0/-0)

Vaccines cause cancer.

They just say everything causes cancer because they don't really know.

Some stuff is not good to injest but it won't do anything unless your immune system is already down the toilet, which vaccines are great at doing.

Also don't be a fat fuck.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 01:55:40 ago (+1/-0)

pet dog cancer rates have exploded in recent years... as has the amount of people getting their dogs vaccinated. they also eat shit processed food like us, but they've been doing that for a while now, so it's definitely the vaccines which is aligned with the sudden increase. although things like flea treatments, shampoos etc. have also increased massively in recent years so it may be that factor, they are literal chemicals so

[ - ] Badgeroo 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 05:41:49 ago (+0/-0)

Except, unlike humans, there are plenty of articles saying don't overvax your dogs because it'll cause cancer, but all (I think) insurance policies REQUIRE annual vaccinations or you aren't covered. They know exactly what they're doing.

[ - ] Pasty 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 00:47:35 ago (+0/-0)

Isn't it just that everything else is pretty much cured? You don't see people dying of consumption anymore.

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 23:08:02 ago (+0/-0)

I would believe this about chemo at least in my circle. Most everyone I've known who went the chemo treatment was pronounced cancer free just to find out several years later, it came back attacked another part of their body and was terminal.

[ - ] TheodoreKent 0 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 21:24:51 ago (+0/-0)

I think I agree with about 75% of what you say.

I am curious about what you mean when you say

What is however effective against cancer and has shown consistently to be effective are fruits and vegetables

Are you referring to this diet as preventative of cancer, or as a diet to be prescribed when you have detectable cancer?

[ - ] SOULESS 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 02:31:21 ago (+0/-0)

Careful with that. My uncle had a non-terminal cancer and decided to use the Gerson Therapy which is a diet-cure.

His cancer ended up becoming terminal and he died. He had no positive impacts from eating perfectly.

You really need to treat cancer hard and fast, but you can try to PREVENT cancer with a good diet.

[ - ] didyouknow [op] 0 points 9 monthsSep 8, 2024 02:54:27 ago (+0/-0)

I should have been more clear here. In terms of why cancer rates were lower in the past, the diet was more of a preventative of cancer. The example of India I mentioned with low colon cancer rates, that's probably due to their diet helping to prevent the onset of colon cancer as turmeric has the biggest effect there.

I can't claim that diet itself can cure cancer. But diet can sure help to prevent it.

Doctors already recommend a certain diet to help with the cancer treatment, however, the effect the diet has is most likely reduced because fruits and vegetables people buy at the store are not as natural as they should be.

The biggest problem is the lack of progress when it comes to cancer treatments and a lot of that is attributed to the corrupt medical establishment reluctance to properly support researchers who want to find a safer and more effective means of treating cancer. And why? That's because chemo makes them a lot of money.. and it also helps kill off the 'goy'. When a person who has cancer and gets chemo and later dies, it's hard to tell if the person died because of the cancer or because of the chemo.

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 19:33:16 ago (+0/-0)

the society we have today is a society they created and that they run entirely.

'Modern jewish society'. Stand way back and look at how our societies really work.

[ - ] beece 0 points 9 monthsSep 7, 2024 18:53:06 ago (+0/-0)

Makes sense to me OP. Any stats to back it up? Ie, study of some primitive culture that doesn't have access to roundup - etc