Hey, just in time to have zero impact on public opinion or on whether or not this bullshit ruined his life. Seven years after the fact, the damage has been done, and we've discovered that the public's general disposition toward the truth is (a) it's not as important as what the herd thinks and (b) it's utterly contingent on time.
A non-gulity verdict seven years later is basically a guilty a verdict. This seems to be one major way they are rigging the justice system, aside from stacking it with activist judges. If you can drag proceedings out for years, there is enough time for the media to determine a de facto guilty verdict, long before an actual verdict comes through and is heard by nobody.
Also, 'burning something with the intent to intimidate'. What sort of malarky is this? Proof of intent? Okay, if the guy had dressed in a white hood and burned a cross, then you might have a claim given the symbolic significance of those details. But a torch?
Meanwhile, Muslims can walk around in groups carrying machetes and shouting hostile-sounding sand nigger mumbo jumbo at innocent people, and that's a-o-fucking-k.
Can he sue the Mayor of Charlottesville? He CAN show that she participated in some truly inciting rhetoric. She stated publically that all White people should be killed, as did another city council member. They have tried to memory hole that but it can be trudged up. The internet is forever.
Suing those that defame and intend to ruin you/end your life is the only way he can undo the defacto guilty sentence.
Since taxes for governments are all funded by white men the buck is basically being passed to all your fellow whites while nobody responsible is punished.
They're still trying to charge people from an event that happened 7 years ago? Holy shit our justice system is intentionally broken in ways that fuck us.
I wonder when statutes of limitation went out the window. I have questions about all the rape show trials of late and state legislatures changing law to specifically target citizens. I have questions when freedom of association became illegal. Let alone the right to assemble. And at this point it's almost comical to utter the phrase "equal under the law." A reckoning is at hand, earthly, assuredly divine, or both.
I am thankful that one judge called it as the law of this land is written. We just need so much more of it.
It means that every single domestic terrorist during the BLM riots can still be charged. (Right, Justice Department? Right?)
"Intent to intimidate". Oooh a new word similar to "hate speech". I like it. Start making all of those participating in the ongoing anti-White movement eat their words.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 16 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 15:35:09 ago (+16/-0)
A non-gulity verdict seven years later is basically a guilty a verdict. This seems to be one major way they are rigging the justice system, aside from stacking it with activist judges. If you can drag proceedings out for years, there is enough time for the media to determine a de facto guilty verdict, long before an actual verdict comes through and is heard by nobody.
Also, 'burning something with the intent to intimidate'. What sort of malarky is this? Proof of intent? Okay, if the guy had dressed in a white hood and burned a cross, then you might have a claim given the symbolic significance of those details. But a torch?
Meanwhile, Muslims can walk around in groups carrying machetes and shouting hostile-sounding sand nigger mumbo jumbo at innocent people, and that's a-o-fucking-k.
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 6 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 20:16:12 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 3 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 16:00:55 ago (+3/-0)
Suing those that defame and intend to ruin you/end your life is the only way he can undo the defacto guilty sentence.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 6 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 17:06:29 ago (+6/-0)
Since taxes for governments are all funded by white men the buck is basically being passed to all your fellow whites while nobody responsible is punished.
Guillotines seem like proper redress.
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 8 monthsAug 23, 2024 02:34:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 8 monthsAug 23, 2024 06:56:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Stonkmar
[ - ] Stonkmar 1 point 8 monthsAug 23, 2024 12:06:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 12 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 14:45:20 ago (+12/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 2 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 14:58:44 ago (+2/-0)
I am thankful that one judge called it as the law of this land is written. We just need so much more of it.
[ + ] TomMacdonald
[ - ] TomMacdonald 0 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 17:41:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 2plus2equals5
[ - ] 2plus2equals5 1 point 8 monthsAug 23, 2024 07:47:26 ago (+1/-0)
(Right, Justice Department? Right?)
"Intent to intimidate". Oooh a new word similar to "hate speech".
I like it.
Start making all of those participating in the ongoing anti-White movement eat their words.
[ + ] LawFag
[ - ] LawFag 0 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 18:10:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] letsgetit
[ - ] letsgetit 2 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 13:49:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] glooper
[ - ] glooper 3 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 15:05:42 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 1 point 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 16:17:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 8 monthsAug 22, 2024 19:32:25 ago (+0/-0)