This PROVES curvature, you stupid assed muther fucker. Curvature. Proof of curvature, using mathematics that you can verify using GPS.
The comparison of the distance between two lines of longitude at a specific northerly Latitude and the same two lines of longitude at the corresponding southerly Latitude being equal and both being shorter than at the equator is only possible with a globe. That is a fundamental geometric principle of a sphere. This can ONLY be possible/practical with a sphere.
The distance from Perth Australia to Ushuaia Argentina (the southern most tip of south America) is 6450 miles.
The distance from Ottawa Canada to Bejing China is 6911.
This can ONLY be possible on a sphere.
2 ways that you can absolutely prove the earth is a sphere, you utter fucking faggot.
And, I gave you the explanation for how pressure exists without a barrier that you about could not exist with a sphere earth, which is easily proven.
Compressability of a gaseous fluid does not change the fundamental characteristics of pressure caused by weight, you utter fucking faggot.
This PROVES curvature, you stupid assed muther fucker. Curvature. Proof of curvature, using mathematics that you can verify using GPS.
No it doesn't. You don't understand what proof is if you think theoretical models constitute as proof.
Satellites in space don't exist, Earths gas pressure is held in with a physical barrier. Go ahead and copy and paste some more theoretical math and misuse of Pascals law to try and prove me wrong again.
Compressability of a gaseous fluid does not change the fundamental characteristics of pressure caused by weight
If you fill up a container with a mixture of gasses, those gasses will eventually separate into a vertical gradient based on buoyance and density. Dense gas sinks, buoyant gas rises. When the entire container/confined system undergoes compression then Pascals law applies.
Once your free from all the dogmatic theoretical bullshit you believe is "scientific fact" then you never go back. I don't share the same faith in theoretical nonsense that you do.
Nigger, mathematical proof is a thing, ya donkey fucker. It isn't a theoretical model if you can observe and verify actual positions drawn from the model on the real world.
I don't give a fuck if you're too fucking stupid to believe satelites exist, ya fuckin' moron. GPS is accurate regardless of your utterly fucking stupid theories on how a tower and balloon system would work.
I showed you how pressure can be exerted from the weight of the atmosphere above you. And Pascal's Law are not theoretical equations nor is it being misused here. The compressability of a fluid simply changes the equation to take into about the changing density as pressure increases.
What causes the dense gas to sink? Gravity ya fucking moron, which is why the equations for buoyancy contain the gravitational constant, just like the equations for free fall, hydrostatic pressure, and weight. And whether you think gravity is a thing or not, the phenomenon that you use to suggest that denser gasses fall is the phenomenon that allows us to determine how fast things fall, how quickly the heavier, denser gas fall below the less dense gasses, and how much pressure is exerted by weight over an Area, which, when discussing atmospheric pressure, is the weight of the column of air over the surface of the earth. This is also why you won't answer the basic simple question, "how low does the pressure get when all the gasses have settled and the pressure is observed at the highest altitudes of that gradient. Basically zero pressure. Without the need for a physical barrier, which can't exist on a globed earth, which is proven, mathematically and observable using GPS positioning and measurements.
And again, you can use middle school levels of math to prove, not theorize, prove the earth is a sphere and verify the measurements using GPS which you know of accurate enough to draw conclusions from the mathematical proof.
All the lights in the sky can be whatever you want to imagine they are, they are merely lights in the sky that help us circumnavigate the earth and keep time accurately.
If you want to be sucked into kike fairytales and CGI images of "planets" then you do you.
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 3 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 17:06:46 ago (+3/-0)
Part two of article summary: when we block the sun its for your own good.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 17:09:11 ago (+3/-0)
Bullshit faggot. And you know God damnedv well that the earth is a sphere, ya disingenuous fucking nigger.
Disproving global warming is easier than proving that the earth is a sphere.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 17:14:20 ago (+0/-1)
Who won world war 2 and kicked of the fake space race?
kikes did.
There is no proof that earth is a sphere. There is no proof of "global" warming.
There is plenty of proof that the earth is level, stationary and enclosed. Gas pressure wouldn't exist if the Earth wasn't enclosed. NPC
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 17:20:03 ago (+1/-1)
https://amsi.org.au/ESA_Senior_Years/SeniorTopic8/8b/8b_2content_5.html
This PROVES curvature, you stupid assed muther fucker. Curvature. Proof of curvature, using mathematics that you can verify using GPS.
The comparison of the distance between two lines of longitude at a specific northerly Latitude and the same two lines of longitude at the corresponding southerly Latitude being equal and both being shorter than at the equator is only possible with a globe. That is a fundamental geometric principle of a sphere. This can ONLY be possible/practical with a sphere.
The distance from Perth Australia to Ushuaia Argentina (the southern most tip of south America) is 6450 miles.
The distance from Ottawa Canada to Bejing China is 6911.
This can ONLY be possible on a sphere.
2 ways that you can absolutely prove the earth is a sphere, you utter fucking faggot.
And, I gave you the explanation for how pressure exists without a barrier that you about could not exist with a sphere earth, which is easily proven.
Compressability of a gaseous fluid does not change the fundamental characteristics of pressure caused by weight, you utter fucking faggot.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 22:48:05 ago (+0/-0)
No it doesn't. You don't understand what proof is if you think theoretical models constitute as proof.
Satellites in space don't exist, Earths gas pressure is held in with a physical barrier. Go ahead and copy and paste some more theoretical math and misuse of Pascals law to try and prove me wrong again.
If you fill up a container with a mixture of gasses, those gasses will eventually separate into a vertical gradient based on buoyance and density. Dense gas sinks, buoyant gas rises. When the entire container/confined system undergoes compression then Pascals law applies.
Once your free from all the dogmatic theoretical bullshit you believe is "scientific fact" then you never go back. I don't share the same faith in theoretical nonsense that you do.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 10 monthsAug 17, 2024 08:26:44 ago (+0/-1)*
I don't give a fuck if you're too fucking stupid to believe satelites exist, ya fuckin' moron. GPS is accurate regardless of your utterly fucking stupid theories on how a tower and balloon system would work.
I showed you how pressure can be exerted from the weight of the atmosphere above you. And Pascal's Law are not theoretical equations nor is it being misused here. The compressability of a fluid simply changes the equation to take into about the changing density as pressure increases.
Shown here
https://sciencing.com/calculate-atmospheric-pressure-2644.html
Observable, verifiable. Science.
What causes the dense gas to sink? Gravity ya fucking moron, which is why the equations for buoyancy contain the gravitational constant, just like the equations for free fall, hydrostatic pressure, and weight. And whether you think gravity is a thing or not, the phenomenon that you use to suggest that denser gasses fall is the phenomenon that allows us to determine how fast things fall, how quickly the heavier, denser gas fall below the less dense gasses, and how much pressure is exerted by weight over an Area, which, when discussing atmospheric pressure, is the weight of the column of air over the surface of the earth. This is also why you won't answer the basic simple question, "how low does the pressure get when all the gasses have settled and the pressure is observed at the highest altitudes of that gradient. Basically zero pressure. Without the need for a physical barrier, which can't exist on a globed earth, which is proven, mathematically and observable using GPS positioning and measurements.
And again, you can use middle school levels of math to prove, not theorize, prove the earth is a sphere and verify the measurements using GPS which you know of accurate enough to draw conclusions from the mathematical proof.
You utter fucking nigger.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 0 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 18:16:23 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 10 monthsAug 16, 2024 22:49:32 ago (+0/-0)
If you want to be sucked into kike fairytales and CGI images of "planets" then you do you.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 10 monthsAug 17, 2024 08:37:53 ago (+0/-1)
Shut up, ya fuckin' faggot.