submitted by paul_neri to Health 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 07:25:14 ago (+3/-7) (www.msn.com)
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/bad-news-for-meat-lovers-after-20-years-of-research/ar-BB1mtpPN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=cec7cef97e9a4cf9be73301a0fcd0123&ei=9
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 14:08:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Drstrangestgov
[ - ] Drstrangestgov 0 points 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 11:26:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 09:52:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Drstrangestgov
[ - ] Drstrangestgov 1 point 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 11:27:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ilikeskittles
[ - ] ilikeskittles 1 point 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 08:40:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 5 points 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 07:50:03 ago (+5/-0)
That msm site is such a definitive source of hard hitting news we all need to see.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 7 points 9 monthsAug 8, 2024 07:32:07 ago (+7/-0)
Cause there is a grand canyon of difference between grass fed organic ribeyes and a McDonald's hamburger patty. Or, a high quality sushi vs long John silvers fried cod or tilapia.
Did the meta study, which are not a good source for these kinds of evaluations, parse these differences?