How many times has the jew fuck media taken Alex Jones, or Trump's statements out of context to suggest that they said something that they never even remotely suggested, that you haven't learned that trick, yet?
The messianic prophecies that legitimize Christ as the Messiah are in the Torah. Why did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on a donkey? You don't know. Because you never read the parts of the Bible containing the messianic prophecies, because it's in "muh torrah!"
Yes. And he attempted to miscontextualize the Bible and I said that after the countless times people have miscontextualize people, he should be able to recognize that it's being done to the Bible, too. By filthy fucking jewsv JUST LIKE YOU!
No. The Bible was around when everybody understood the Earth was flat. I have no doubt that they were using knowledgeable cosmology of the time. I have no reason to doubt that they were being honest with their interpretation of the shape of the Earth.
No. The Bible was around when everybody understood the Earth was flat. I have no doubt that they were using knowledgeable cosmology of the time. I have no reason to doubt that they were being honest with their interpretation of the shape of the Earth.
No. The Bible was around when everybody understood the Earth was flat. I have no doubt that they were using knowledgeable cosmology of the time. I have no reason to doubt that they were being honest with their interpretation of the shape of the Earth.
If you actually care, which I doubt, you can go read my comment history in these threads with McNasty. I take a shit on every flat-earth argument he has made. I'm not rehashing any more of it here.
Science necessitates appeals to authority. That's how it works, unless you plan on carrying out every experiment ever done yourself.
Alright Love, get your Tylenol out of the cupboard, and answer me this.
Polaris exists virtually on a line with earth's north pole. That means for someone standing at earth's north pole, the north star wouldn't move. It also means that Polaris is directly visible at night everywhere in the northern hemisphere.
On flat earth, there aren't any hemispheres. Polaris should be direclty visible at night from anywhere on earth.
Now explain why Polaris can't be seen anywhere within the regions non-retards map as the southern hemisphere.
Alright Love, get your Tylenol out of the cupboard, and answer me this.
Getting ready for your Begging the question.
On flat earth, there aren't any hemispheres. Polaris should be direclty visible at night from anywhere on earth.
There it is; Misunderstanding of perspective and vanishing point and the inverse-square law baked into the question.
Now explain why Polaris can't be seen anywhere within the regions non-retards map as the southern hemisphere.
Can you see China from your home? How about the next state over? Why not? ... Because you haven't considered perspective and vanishing point. Not to mention the inverse-square law, which has to do with how light falls off over distance.
This I typically call the 'whataboutism' effect, wherein the globe believer exhibits the Invincible Ignorance fallacy (ignores evidence that there is a problem with their model) in order to continue their line of questioning.
Which is really just an admission that they don't know their own model.
Perspective and vanishing point have nothing to do with objects at Polaris's distance from earth. If it is visible from one place on flat earth, it is expected to be visible from all. Imagine being inside of a hollow pyramid. The analogy would be that the floor of the pyramid is earth and the tip of the pyramid is Polaris. There is no place on the pyramid's floor where the highest inside point is not visible. Same idea here.
Perspective and vanishing point have nothing to do with objects at Polaris's distance from earth.
You are making a claim, prove it.
If it is visible from one place on flat earth, it is expected to be visible from all.
You didn't answer why you can't see China from your house, or why you can't see one state over.
You didn't address WHY perspective, vanishing point and the inverse-square law don't apply. You just claim they do not with no proof.
Imagine being inside of a hollow pyramid. The analogy would be that the floor of the pyramid is earth and the tip of the pyramid is Polaris. There is no place on the pyramid's floor where the highest inside point is not visible. Same idea here.
Another story that has no bearing on reality.
"If you were in a box (or pyramid for whatever reason in your story) and there was a light in the center you could see it from everywhere"
Can you see your ceiling fan light from 12 miles away? Why not?
You completely ignore distance from the center, perspective, vanishing point and the inverse-square law.
My ceiling fan isn't a star 4.5 times the size of our own sun blazing 3,000 light years away on the same line as earth's axis. Light from Polaris reaches every point on (flat) earth due to the way stars emit light. The only way it wouldn't be expected to be visible from every point on earth is if earth has a 3-dimensional shape and some people live on parts of the surface that physically block the view of Polaris.
In the analogy I gave, if the base/floor of the pyramid is sufficiently large, you wouldn't be expected to have direct visibility of all points on the floor from any given point. But all points on the floor can see the highest inner point of the pyramid.
No. They were the brightest men around. They used to burn people that pushed jewish bullshit at the stake. Nobody liked those faggots that worshiped the Sun. You know, the Kabbalah. The thing that Freemasonry is built upon.
Lol. An astral lab is how they used to measure distances. It only works on a flat plane.
If you give me a sphere and tell me the circumference of it, I can mathematically use a formula to figure out where the horizon should be. Your model fails to produce observable reality.
Lol. An astral lab is how they used to measure distances.
When? Cause today, we have GPS, Radio navigation, rulers, tape measures, odometers, and speedometers with stopwatch.
And NONE of it work on a flat earth model, which is why you can't provide a scale for distance on any of your models. None of them.
Just like the guy who created the model that you used to show what the flat earth looked like,
The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.
Seen here.
Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.
That works by triangulating signals between cell towers.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, it still proves the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
I've asked you to prove that GPS is radiotowers. You can't. But it doesn't matter if it's towers or satelites. The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.
What is Cell Tower Triangulation? In an ideal scenario, the GPS tracker’s signal may be picked up by 3 or more cell towers, enabling the triangulation to work. From a mathematical standpoint, if you have the distance to a location from each of three distinct points, you can compute the approximate location of that location in relation to the three reference points. At Tracki since we access to mapping of all cellular towers location worldwide, we know the locations of the cell towers which receive our GSM signal, and we can estimate the distance of the GPS tracker from each of those antenna towers, based upon the lag time between when the tower sends a ping to Tracki GPS tracker and receives the answering ping back.
You're so disingenuous. I have to go find a link every time we talk about this subject or you're going to deny it?
The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.
The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
No it doesn't retard.
Gps triangulation would require trigonometry. Trigonometry can't work on a sphere. If my cell phone is pinging off of a satellite and also a tower, how can it ping off the line of sight Tower if it is obstructed by the physical curvature of the Earth?
The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.
Are you under the impression that if GPS were radiotowers instead of satellites
Yes I keep telling you that and I keep linking to you to the proof. That's how disingenuous you are. There's literally a link in my last comment explaining to you how GPS uses cell towers to triangulate position.
The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.
You are actually retarded, damn. I thought you might just be cloaking because you're a beta male with no friends. How very predictable that your cartoon cites no sources and is clearly just pulled out of a flat tard's ass.
Even the most early and basic evidence for a sphere earth blows your dumb swarthoid brain out: "The two things that eventually convinced him of his hypothesis were lunar eclipses and the fact that the horizon seemed to make ships disappear. The earth casts an unmistakable round shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse, and when a ship returns to land onlookers will first see its mast tops, then its sails, and finally its hull. In this light Pythagoras surmised the earth must have a curvature."
The earth casts an unmistakable round shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse, and when a ship returns to land onlookers will first see its mast tops, then its sails, and finally its hull.
I’ve asked him to try this experiment at home with a coin, a ball and a torch.
Simple instructions both confuse and enrage the swarthoid foreskin snatcher.
I accept your concession of defeat. Thank you for your feckless vitriol. I get a chuckle out of how you squirm when you have no argument.
The two things that eventually convinced him of his hypothesis were lunar eclipses and the fact that the horizon seemed to make ships disappear. The earth casts an unmistakable round shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse, and when a ship returns to land onlookers will first see its mast tops, then its sails, and finally its hull. In this light Pythagoras surmised the earth must have a curvature.
The light in the sky is round, therefore earth round! - Grug
Ship go far away and cannot see, therefore earth round! - Grug
Both of which are completely illogical, but hey, if you're convinced by that. Live a blissful life, bud. You'll just be a royal pain in the ass to everyone around you.
Lol says the drooling fucking retard in the cuckstianity cult because "faith".
Look bud we know, because you've admitted, that you're too stupid to understand even the basics of physics, mathematics, astronomy, biology, and even the most basic tenets of reality. All you're good for is batting around like a cat toy. And boy do you put up a fuss, brainlet 😉
Ok. You're right. I can't personally have a baby. I'm just saying how exciting it is to live in a time so enlightened and so knowledgeable that we know scientifically that men can have babies. The possibilities are infinite. Lol.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 8 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:14:53 ago (+8/-0)
How many times has the jew fuck media taken Alex Jones, or Trump's statements out of context to suggest that they said something that they never even remotely suggested, that you haven't learned that trick, yet?
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:54:41 ago (+2/-1)
A Christ-Cuck can't even get past Leviticus.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 20:25:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 21:06:29 ago (+0/-1)
Imagine having a Jewish-Savior who's legitimacy as messiah relies on prophecies from the Torah.
ProTip: You are almost there.
All you need to do now is forsake your Jew-Christ and declare White Blood and White Soil your highest power.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 21:08:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 21:28:47 ago (+0/-0)
Why did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on a donkey?
You don't know. Because you never read the parts of the Bible containing the messianic prophecies, because it's in "muh torrah!"
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 9 monthsAug 3, 2024 03:34:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -5 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:22:56 ago (+1/-6)
https://truthpodium.org/watch/alex-jones-exposed_DqkeP2IrjiwnWqD.html
Not only do you defend jews at NASA but you defend zog Donald and Alex Jones who admitted to having CIA in his family and actively shills for Israel.
This isn't an Alex Jones crowd faggot.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:26:06 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:27:17 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:29:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:30:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:32:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:32:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:32:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:33:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:26:33 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 6 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 17:57:56 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 20:29:48 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 21:51:16 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 1 point 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:19:10 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:00:53 ago (+4/-4)
Nobody needs to read the Bible to learn that the Earth is flat. Every single culture in history had a flat Earth cosmology. It's not exclusive.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 9 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:15:54 ago (+9/-0)
"Hey guyyzzz, every culture in history before modern science thought the earth was flat! So we should too hurrffff."
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:18:24 ago (+1/-5)
Man, if only you had an argument.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 7 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:23:02 ago (+7/-0)
Science necessitates appeals to authority. That's how it works, unless you plan on carrying out every experiment ever done yourself.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:37:38 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:34:43 ago (+1/-2)
That's funny. If you actually cared you'd research the lack of curvature instead of regurgitating your indoctrination.
Oh, no doubt, that's pretty much all globe believers do.
Ad hominems and non-sequiturs.
Science necessitates test-ability and repeatability.
But you don't know what science is, obviously.
of which you haven't done the simplest, otherwise you would know the curvature of the globe model is nowhere to be found.
You spout psuedo-intellectual placations and hope everyone mistakes them for genius. You mingle that with ad hominems while you beg the question.
Globe believers are a mish-mash of logical fallacies and angst.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:38:09 ago (+4/-0)
Polaris exists virtually on a line with earth's north pole. That means for someone standing at earth's north pole, the north star wouldn't move. It also means that Polaris is directly visible at night everywhere in the northern hemisphere.
On flat earth, there aren't any hemispheres. Polaris should be direclty visible at night from anywhere on earth.
Now explain why Polaris can't be seen anywhere within the regions non-retards map as the southern hemisphere.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:44:33 ago (+2/-2)
Getting ready for your Begging the question.
There it is;
Misunderstanding of perspective and vanishing point and the inverse-square law baked into the question.
Can you see China from your home? How about the next state over?
Why not?
...
Because you haven't considered perspective and vanishing point. Not to mention the inverse-square law, which has to do with how light falls off over distance.
This I typically call the 'whataboutism' effect, wherein the globe believer exhibits the Invincible Ignorance fallacy (ignores evidence that there is a problem with their model) in order to continue their line of questioning.
Which is really just an admission that they don't know their own model.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:50:32 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:55:41 ago (+1/-2)
You are making a claim, prove it.
You didn't answer why you can't see China from your house, or why you can't see one state over.
You didn't address WHY perspective, vanishing point and the inverse-square law don't apply. You just claim they do not with no proof.
Another story that has no bearing on reality.
"If you were in a box (or pyramid for whatever reason in your story) and there was a light in the center you could see it from everywhere"
Can you see your ceiling fan light from 12 miles away? Why not?
You completely ignore distance from the center, perspective, vanishing point and the inverse-square law.
Again, invincible-ignorance fallacy.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:03:31 ago (+3/-0)
In the analogy I gave, if the base/floor of the pyramid is sufficiently large, you wouldn't be expected to have direct visibility of all points on the floor from any given point. But all points on the floor can see the highest inner point of the pyramid.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:50:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 20:41:18 ago (+2/-0)
Thank you for pointing them out it is beyond obvious I wish more people understood it.
Once you see those tactics you know they are not genuine or real most likely bots or shills
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 23:13:13 ago (+1/-0)
Thank you for pointing them out it is beyond obvious I wish more people understood it.
Once you see those tactics you know they are not genuine or real most likely bots or shills
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:18:49 ago (+0/-4)
No. They were the brightest men around. They used to burn people that pushed jewish bullshit at the stake. Nobody liked those faggots that worshiped the Sun. You know, the Kabbalah. The thing that Freemasonry is built upon.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:15:58 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:17:24 ago (+1/-4)
If you give me a sphere and tell me the circumference of it, I can mathematically use a formula to figure out where the horizon should be. Your model fails to produce observable reality.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:21:23 ago (+5/-0)
When? Cause today, we have GPS, Radio navigation, rulers, tape measures, odometers, and speedometers with stopwatch.
And NONE of it work on a flat earth model, which is why you can't provide a scale for distance on any of your models. None of them.
Just like the guy who created the model that you used to show what the flat earth looked like,
Seen here.
ONLY IF ... get all the distances right.
You can't even add and subtract.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:24:05 ago (+1/-4)
That works by triangulating signals between cell towers.
We've been through this. Already posted links. I'm not going to do it again. You are obviously hired to object every time I bring it up.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:29:01 ago (+5/-0)
Even if that were true, which it isn't, it still proves the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
I've asked you to prove that GPS is radiotowers. You can't. But it doesn't matter if it's towers or satelites. The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
The earth cannot possibly be flat.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=66a63ecd27027
Seen here.
https://files.catbox.moe/atwc9a.jpg
ONLY IF ... get all the distances right.
This is only possible on a spherical earth.
The Earth can only be sphere. It's the only reasonable shape that explains this.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:32:14 ago (+1/-3)
https://tracki.com/pages/how-gps-tracker-works-and-cell-phone-tower-triangulation-accuracy
You're so disingenuous. I have to go find a link every time we talk about this subject or you're going to deny it?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:34:01 ago (+5/-0)
It doesn't matter if it's towers or satelites. The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
The earth cannot possibly be flat.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=66a63ecd27027
Seen here.
https://files.catbox.moe/atwc9a.jpg
ONLY IF ... get all the distances right.
This is only possible on a spherical earth.
The Earth can only be sphere. It's the only reasonable shape that explains this.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:37:00 ago (+2/-3)
No it doesn't retard.
Gps triangulation would require trigonometry. Trigonometry can't work on a sphere. If my cell phone is pinging off of a satellite and also a tower, how can it ping off the line of sight Tower if it is obstructed by the physical curvature of the Earth?
It's retarded.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:40:07 ago (+4/-0)
Trig absolutely works on a sphere you utter dumb fuck.
Holy shit. That's gotta be the dumbest fucking thing you've said, yet.
And again,
It doesn't matter if it's towers or satelites. The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
The earth cannot possibly be flat.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=66a63ecd27027
Seen here.
https://files.catbox.moe/atwc9a.jpg
ONLY IF ... get all the distances right.
This is only possible on a spherical earth.
The Earth can only be sphere. It's the only reasonable shape that explains this.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:38:16 ago (+1/-2)
Yes I keep telling you that and I keep linking to you to the proof. That's how disingenuous you are. There's literally a link in my last comment explaining to you how GPS uses cell towers to triangulate position.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:40:24 ago (+4/-0)
It doesn't matter if it's towers or satelites. The GPS system PROVES us the earth is a sphere and cannot possibly be flat.
The earth cannot possibly be flat.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=66a63ecd27027
Seen here.
https://files.catbox.moe/atwc9a.jpg
ONLY IF ... get all the distances right.
This is only possible on a spherical earth.
The Earth can only be sphere. It's the only reasonable shape that explains this.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:11:47 ago (+3/-3)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 6 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:35:52 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:37:27 ago (+1/-2)
Except they knew it wasn't a globe; intro; the astrolabe, which only works on a flat earth.
Embarrassing indeed, the appeal to 'ancient Greece' as your authority without understanding the simplest of things.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:43:17 ago (+4/-0)
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/ancient-greeks-proved-earth-round-eratosthenes-alexandria-syene-summer-solstice-a8131376.html
https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2006/06/eratosthenes-measures-earth
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:48:52 ago (+1/-2)
On top of that, the 'measurements' are equally able to happen on a flat earth
Once again you show us how you have done no research and are simply appealing to authority which you do not understand.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 5 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:01:43 ago (+5/-0)
Even the most early and basic evidence for a sphere earth blows your dumb swarthoid brain out: "The two things that eventually convinced him of his hypothesis were lunar eclipses and the fact that the horizon seemed to make ships disappear. The earth casts an unmistakable round shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse, and when a ship returns to land onlookers will first see its mast tops, then its sails, and finally its hull. In this light Pythagoras surmised the earth must have a curvature."
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:57:10 ago (+4/-0)
I’ve asked him to try this experiment at home with a coin, a ball and a torch.
Simple instructions both confuse and enrage the swarthoid foreskin snatcher.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:04:52 ago (+1/-3)
I accept your concession of defeat. Thank you for your feckless vitriol. I get a chuckle out of how you squirm when you have no argument.
The light in the sky is round, therefore earth round! - Grug
Ship go far away and cannot see, therefore earth round! - Grug
Both of which are completely illogical, but hey, if you're convinced by that. Live a blissful life, bud. You'll just be a royal pain in the ass to everyone around you.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:15:37 ago (+3/-0)
Look bud we know, because you've admitted, that you're too stupid to understand even the basics of physics, mathematics, astronomy, biology, and even the most basic tenets of reality. All you're good for is batting around like a cat toy. And boy do you put up a fuss, brainlet 😉
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:45:00 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:50:46 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:51:24 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:02:41 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:05:59 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 18:51:17 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sunman_Omega
[ - ] Sunman_Omega 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 19:38:10 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 9 monthsAug 2, 2024 22:06:44 ago (+0/-0)