×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
-3

What part of their quote is a jewish grift?

submitted by McNasty to SPACEisFAKEandGAY 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:09:15 ago (+1/-4)     (SPACEisFAKEandGAY)

Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. -Nikola Tesla-


61 comments block


[ - ] HelenHighwater 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:18:24 ago (+2/-1)

If you can show a mathematical proof about Einstein's general or special relativity being wrong, please post it for peer review, if you Kant, then maybe you should pursue a more reasonable area to critique.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:19:24 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HelenHighwater -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:30:36 ago (+1/-2)

that's it asshole, meet me outside in five minutes. gonna hotbox this thc vape and then kick your lard ass all over the high school parking lot. Bring some friends to carry you home.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:32:51 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HelenHighwater -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:34:19 ago (+1/-2)

oh dear.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:35:49 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 09:20:33 ago (+0/-0)

Speaking of oreos...how was your MMM threesome last night?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 09:25:47 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 09:26:36 ago (+0/-0)

More like "Tri State ambulance services rush burn victim to hospital"

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 09:27:55 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:22:32 ago (+0/-1)

Of course. Let's just ask how accurate relativity is without the inference of dark matter.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/791881/general-relativity-doesnt-quite-work-without-dark-matter

I am taking an astrophysics course, and my astro professor said that "we need to introduce dark matter because Einstein's general relativity doesn't quite work without it".

This guy was trying to study the subject and was told this by his professor so he dug into it more. It has everything you need to know. It's newtonians equation minus the ether. This equals an inaccurate model that needs to infer dark matter.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:22:51 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:43:32 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Portmanure 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:12:41 ago (+2/-1)

Einstein theory, while not entirely of Einsteins endeavors he managed to put together existing theories in a very clever way that explained most things at the time. But there were and still are flaws. Einsteins constant is a classic example of “except for this part” mathematics.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 2 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:29:57 ago (+2/-0)

That's actually accurate. Einstein was an interesting man and certainly put out some very interesting ideas that unfortunately don't hold up to scrutiny.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:35:22 ago (+0/-1)

Einstein was a jewish grifter you dumb faggot. His equation was 95% inaccurate unless he inferred a make-believe matter.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:37:24 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:13:35 ago (+0/-1)

That wasn't my question. My question was about the quote. What part of the quote is a jewish grift. Nicola Tesla is clearly talking about Einstein's work and not Einstein personally. So whether or not Einstein got the work from somebody else is irrelevant.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:54:28 ago (+1/-0)

I've explained this to you more than once. Either you're too stupid to grasp it, or you're some lonely fuck who finds it entertaining to keep spamming the site with the same dumbass talking points over and over again. Tesla didn't think the earth was flat. Nobody with a brain has thought the earth was flat for over two-thousand years.

If you can find me even a shred of evidence that Tesla argued for flat earth, I'll take you seriously. Until then, nobody at this site should be engaging with you at all.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:02:53 ago (+0/-1)

Tesla didn't think the earth was flat.

He said heliocentrism was bullshit and I proved that with his quote about relativity. Nicola Tesla believes The ether is real which would mean Mickelson and Morley's null result means that the Earth is not moving according to Nicola Tesla's beliefs.


[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:16:52 ago (+1/-0)

He said heliocentrism was bullshit

He never said any such thing. In fact, he agreed with the heliocentric model.

I proved that with his quote about relativity

No, you didn't. The earth was round under Newtonian mechanics too. Relativity has nothing to do with the position of the sun relative to earth.

Nicola Tesla believes The ether is real which would mean Mickelson and Morley's null result means that the Earth is not moving according to Nicola Tesla's beliefs.

Holy shit, no. First of all, Tesla was extremely mystical when it came to talking about the luminiferous ether. He never produced or even attempted to describe any quanitifable universal properties of this substance. His description of it was metaphysical in nature. That's point one. Now, let's assume that the ether is real. I'll play ball. This does nothing to suggest flat earth. Mickelson's and Morley's experiment might have been a bad method. Their result could have been a false negative. But even if the earth was not moving, that wouldn't entail that the earth is flat. Is there some rule I don't know about that says stationary things are always flat?

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:19:34 ago (+0/-1)

He never said any such thing.

He believed in The ether and he said relativity was nonsense. Relativity is the jewish theory that denies The ether.

Denying the ether is the only way to explain heliocentrism. Isaac Newton said this 180 years before that retarded jew claimed his retarded bullshit.

From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:

And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Isaac Newton knew that his equation was accurate and would not work for the cosmos. So Einstein used his equation and said fuck the ether. It turned out to be 95% and accurate. So he had to infer make believe matter.

This is why Tesla says it's nonsense. He is a believer in The ether. The ether does not allow heliocentrism. It makes the null result from Mickelson and Morley's experiment conclude that the Earth is not moving.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:33:36 ago (+1/-0)

Can you explain why only in the absence of an ether are we able to explain heliocentrism? You keep saying it, but you won't argue it. Newton's law of universal gravitation is still dependent upon mass. Under Newtonian gravity, with an ether, you still get the sun being the dominant gravitational entity in the solar system. Whether gravity works in the 'absurd' way, or in Newton's way, or in Einstein's way, the sun is still the center.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:37:30 ago (+0/-0)

I just posted the letter from Isaac Newton stating why he thought it was absurd and incompetent to believe that gravity can work through a vacuum. He clearly states that it needs a medium. A medium like ether.

Ether was the cornerstone of all scientific framework up until Einstein threw it out.

He could not throw out newtonian's equation because it is accurate and repeatable terrestrially. He can't apply it to his fantasy claims of the cosmos because they are fantasies. When he applies it to his fantasy claims, it is almost entirely inaccurate. He has to infer make believe matter so that his prediction is correct. That is the definition of post hoc reasoning. A logical fallacy.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:41:04 ago (+1/-0)

Answer the fucking question, or stop posting.

The ether doesn't matter. There are three logical cases here.

Case 1: Newton and Einstein are wrong; gravity is spooky action at a distance
Case 2: Newton is right and Einstein is wrong
Case 3: Newton is wrong and Einstein is right

In all three cases, we have no reason to think the sun would not be the center. If gravity is spooky action at a distance due to some innate property of matter (the case Newton called 'absurd'), well the sun still has more matter than the earth. Under Newton's gravitational theory, the sun still has greater mass than the earth. Under Einstein's theory, the sun warps spacetime more than earth does.

In all three, there is no reason to suppose that geocentrism is true.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:44:40 ago (+0/-1)

Newton and Einstein are wrong

Newton was never inaccurate in his claims. Einstein was.

Newton is right and Einstein is wrong

Correct. Gravity does not work through a vacuum because vacuums are not real. Just look at this dumb globe claim.

https://files.catbox.moe/lkcyvy.png

Somehow it's explained as the bending of space-time but they can't keep consistent with what it actually does. It's retarded.

Newton is wrong and Einstein is right

That's retarded. Isaac Newton said that the idea of gravity working through a vacuum was absurd and that anybody pushing this idea was incompetent. 180 years later Albert Einstein did just that and was 95% inaccurate needing the inference of dark matter to make his prediction correct.

It is what it is. Einstein is a jew.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:22:07 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 31, 2024 00:22:46 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:16:41 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Portmanure -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:15:24 ago (+0/-1)

He was saying that Einstein was a grifter.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:19:32 ago (+1/-1)

Yea. That's exactly what he was saying. Nicola Tesla, like everyone else in a scientific community, believe that the ether was the cornerstone of all scientific framework prior to the Mickelson and Morley experiment.

Look at this letter written by Isaac Newton 180 years before Einstein ever made his crazy assumptions.

From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:

And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

There has obviously been an agenda pushed the heliocentric model for a long time. They can never do it because everything required The ether. It wasn't until Einstein invented his theoretical metaphysics that Tesla is referring to and just ignored the ether. Ignoring The ether caused 95% discrepancies in Einstein's claims which required the inferrance of things like dark matter. This is called post hoc reasoning and it is a logical fallacy. This is why Nicola Tesla had a problem with it.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:20:02 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Portmanure -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:24:15 ago (+0/-1)

You ever wonder if the scientific community went down another path? As you described but WWII came a long and disrupted everything. Most of the world’s most brilliant physicists were trapped in Germany. Even Einstein sold out humanity and wrote a letter to Roosevelt about a shortcut to end the war.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:25:37 ago (+0/-1)

You ever wonder if the scientific community went down another path? As you described but WWII came a long and disrupted everything.

No. I think jewish bankers funded all sides of the war and planned everything out.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:26:32 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:32:04 ago (+0/-1)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:33:34 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Portmanure 1 point 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:34:24 ago (+1/-0)

Meh!

[ - ] Portmanure -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:28:37 ago (+0/-1)

.Outside my lane of thinking but possible. I would need more tangible evidence than just accusations.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:30:27 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:29:15 ago (+0/-1)

Well, do you know who was funding it?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:30:44 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Portmanure -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:29:57 ago (+0/-1)

Like I said outside my lane.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:31:00 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 30, 2024 23:30:30 ago (+0/-1)

Ok. Then why are you using the war to support your argument? If it's outside your lane and you know nothing about it, you shouldn't use it.