Lol. I just started calling your bullshit out this week. You faggots make my best arguments. More and more people will start paying attention. It's inevitable.
Hell yeah! Where do you think all of these rare sky occurences are coming from all of a sudden. I have a theory I need to flesh out but that eclipse India is supposed to get on saturday. Fucking satanic.
Hear me out and fill in where I might be missing something:
Two indians posed to be in the white house no matter the election results one of them is getting in. cern and nasa working together to bring about this lunar eclipse where the moon will cover SATURN and then with that jordan peterson and elon musk interview coming out talking about the divine feminine??? Its all occult all the time but we're just supposed to sit back and go ooohhh my eclipses.
From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:
And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.
They could not make any cosmological claims due to the fact that all scientific framework required a medium.
It wasn't until 180 years after this letter that Einstein was that absurd incompetent jew Isaac Newton was referring to in his letter.
Einstein simply used post hoc reasoning by taking his conclusion of the cosmos and building the theory around it.
He took Isaac Newton's equation, copied and pasted it into relativity, and replaced the objective aether with his conceptual space time.
Since the Newtonian equation would not give Einstein his perceived outcome, He had to infer things such as dark matter and black holes. These are more examples of post hoc reasoning.
Nicola Tesla, who I consider a white genius, made his views on Einstein's work very clear.
Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. -Nikola Tesla-
Even Einstein himself, in a single quote will admit his post hoc reasoning by stating that if the Mickelson experiment conclusion was null, that he would change the theory to fit his prediction. Then goes on to state that it would be impossible to prove his claim, and goes on to make the unprovable claim as if it were fact.
While I was thinking of this problem in my student years, I came to know the strange result of Michelson’s experiment. Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion of the Earth with respect to the ether is incorrect, if we admit Michelson’s null result as a fact. This was the first path which led me to the special theory of relativity. Since then I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment, though the Earth is revolving around the Sun. -Einstein-
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 2 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:07:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 10:37:24 ago (+1/-0)
No one wants to hear about your gay sex.
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 1 point 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 01:30:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:13:38 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:21:41 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:27:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:32:55 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:39:08 ago (+0/-0)
Hear me out and fill in where I might be missing something:
Two indians posed to be in the white house no matter the election results one of them is getting in. cern and nasa working together to bring about this lunar eclipse where the moon will cover SATURN and then with that jordan peterson and elon musk interview coming out talking about the divine feminine??? Its all occult all the time but we're just supposed to sit back and go ooohhh my eclipses.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:44:06 ago (+0/-2)
You people are so dumb that you think the Earth is casting its shadow onto the moon.
Watch this genuine person who is a globe Earther who is just excited about the eclipse try to explain what he's looking at.
https://youtu.be/QUkjb4bbjpc
And you think ancient scholars would have seen this and thought, "hey, that must be the Earth's Shadow on the moon?"
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:45:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:07:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:16:11 ago (+1/-2)
They could not make any cosmological claims due to the fact that all scientific framework required a medium.
It wasn't until 180 years after this letter that Einstein was that absurd incompetent jew Isaac Newton was referring to in his letter.
Einstein simply used post hoc reasoning by taking his conclusion of the cosmos and building the theory around it.
He took Isaac Newton's equation, copied and pasted it into relativity, and replaced the objective aether with his conceptual space time.
Since the Newtonian equation would not give Einstein his perceived outcome, He had to infer things such as dark matter and black holes. These are more examples of post hoc reasoning.
Nicola Tesla, who I consider a white genius, made his views on Einstein's work very clear.
Even Einstein himself, in a single quote will admit his post hoc reasoning by stating that if the Mickelson experiment conclusion was null, that he would change the theory to fit his prediction. Then goes on to state that it would be impossible to prove his claim, and goes on to make the unprovable claim as if it were fact.
Some pretty jewish shit.