☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
-3

Interactive flat Earth model that demonstrates all of our observations, including the stars in the southern hemisphere.

submitted by McNasty to SPACEisFAKEandGAY 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:35:09 ago (+3/-6)     (SPACEisFAKEandGAY)

Flat earth claims that space is fake and gay. The person that made this model is a globe earther and tried to use it to debunk the flat Earth. The problem is, as you can see by his statement

It can do this only by doing all calculations in the Heliocentric Model and then projecting the results onto the Flat Earth Model and bending light in a physically impossible manner.

He is taking the heliocentric model and trying to apply it to the flat Earth and then claims that he has to bend the light in unrealistic ways for us to see the observations we do.

This is because his heliocentric claim for cosmology is incorrect. That has always been the flat Earth claim. Nonetheless, when disregarding the notion that heliocentric cosmology is part of the flat Earth, This is a very accurate model.

http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Flat+Earth+Dome+Model&state=--635-21.6-1~19.33904-10-2355.9583-30-91-21-2



74 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:54:17 ago (+2/-0)

1. Where is the scale for distance?

2. The model cannot possibly be accurate.

The distance from Perth Australia to Ushuaia Argentina (the southern most tip of south America) is 6450 miles.

The distance from Ottawa Canada to Bejing China is 6911.

Your model shows the straight line distance from Ottawa to Bejing to be shorter than from Usuaia to Perth.

And. When you look at what a map apps "direct route" between the two cites, tracked on your model, the virtual semi-circle going from Usuaia to Perth is hugely longer than the very curved line from Ottawa to Bejing.

Why are you putting out knowingly disproven flat earth models?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:43:32 ago (+3/-1)

Spam it all you want, yid; eyes prove you wrong.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 17:37:34 ago (+2/-3)

Our eyes literally provide the a priori evidence that the earth is flat, as the horizon is flat.
As do our inner ears which do not sense any movement of the earth.

But you're brainwashed into offloading your own senses to nigger science man.

All hail nigger science man!

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:27:38 ago (+2/-0)

From that very website.

Distances: The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth. Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.

What do you're eyes tell you when you take the flat earth model and start drawing east to west lines and comparing distances between cities in the northern hemisphere to cities along the same longitude coordinates in the southern hemisphere?

Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.

Lol!

[ - ] Love240 -2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:32:09 ago (+0/-2)

Notice how you didn't answer anything I just said?

Answer is: No, you probably don't notice because you're a disingenuous nigger™

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:32:42 ago (+1/-1)

Your inner ear is horrible at sensing movement.

The single most cause of pilot caused deaths is controlled flight info the terrain because a pilot relied on his inner ear sensations, ignored his instruments, and crashed his plane.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi9Oaon_7d4

[ - ] Love240 -2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:34:25 ago (+0/-2)

Your inner ear is horrible at sensing movement.

And then you use an example of movement, of which the inner ear is incredibly sensitive, which is why there is 'confusion'.

The single most cause of pilot caused deaths is controlled flight info the terrain because a pilot relied on his inner ear sensations, ignored his instruments, and crashed his plane.

You must be 'confused' all the time just sitting still.

The cherry on top is that all of those instruments are engineered to work on a flat motionless plane.

You just keep losing.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:25:18 ago (+1/-1)

Our eyes literally provide the a priori evidence that the earth is flat

Thanks for admitting that our eyes see the same stars everywhere in the southern hemisphere, which is impossible on a flat Earth.

As do our inner ears which do not sense any movement of the earth.

Thanks for admitting you have never been in a car.

[ - ] Love240 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:28:50 ago (+1/-1)

another 3rd grader response

you have never been in a car.

You are a literal retard.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 22:11:11 ago (+1/-0)

WAAAAAA MOMMY THE BAD MAN PROVED ME WRONG HE THIRD GRADE NOT MEEEEEEE HE RETARD

Said the flat earther who lacks a basic understanding of optics.

[ - ] Love240 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 22:18:40 ago (+0/-0)

Said the flat earther

That's not an insult to me, retard.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 07:36:26 ago (+1/-1)

Thanks for admitting you lack the scientific knowledge of a third grader.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 20:55:04 ago (+1/-0)

GUISE, pandas are fake. Send all your gold and moneh to my Sandpoint, Idaho po box oy vey pay the gay away

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:03:55 ago (+0/-1)

You're a retard using the all or nothing jew trope. It is only true if it can be independently verified dummy.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:08:52 ago (+1/-0)

GUISE, like, birds are fake and stuff, like, jews aren't the problem at all, like, like, the problem is rich old white dudes, like, I ate some chicken at my black friends house and it was, like, good and stuff. ScAmy used to love bbc. okay, lets land the plane oy vey send all your shekels to me and pay your gay away, bearded manlets

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:11:44 ago (+0/-1)

You can independently verify birds? I have several bird and baths in my yard. Dog ate three baby birds a couple days ago. Birds confirmed.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:14:42 ago (+1/-0)

Guise, the trees are all fake. Send all your moneh to my po box and pay your gay away

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:20:07 ago (+0/-1)

You triggered nigger. Lol.

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 20:28:53 ago (+1/-0)

Drink battery acid Kike.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 20:48:05 ago (+0/-0)

I am really getting to you faggots aren't I? He he.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:43:03 ago (+1/-1)

What about the southern hemisohere? Inwent toban ex9ens8ve college that trained nasa with a henisohere tracker

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:45:09 ago (+2/-3)

You just said a lot of jewish things there.

college that trained nasa with a henisohere tracker

Nasa is jew.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-01/who-got-america-to-the-moon-a-unlikely-collaboration-of-jews-and-former-nazi-engineers

The collaboration between Von Braun and Silverstein was not unique. During the Apollo program, which landed Americans on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972, NASA was filled with both Jewish scientists and a large group of Germans who had worked for Hitler before and during World War II. The Nazi regime had been dedicated to the extermination of Jews. That the two groups were able to work side by side suggests a level of reconciliation, or at least acceptance, that would seem a near impossibility in today’s fractious social and political climate.

Now back to reality. I'm simply providing a model to explain how the southern hemisphere works on a flat Earth. You don't have to believe it, if you were curious as to how a flat Earth or thinks it happens, This is it.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:58:33 ago (+2/-0)

But it doesn't explain it.

If you draw a straight line from the southern most tip of South America (Usuaia, Argentina) to Perth Australia, that line would be much, much longer than the line from Ottawa Canada to Beijing China.

However,

The distance from Perth Australia to Ushuaia Argentina is 6450 miles.

The distance from Ottawa Canada to Bejing China is 6911.

Your model is clearly flawed.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 17:41:58 ago (+1/-2)

But it doesn't explain it.

It does, you just reify the model and beg the questions.

Of course you don't understand that though due to lack of logic, those being logical fallacies.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:12:08 ago (+2/-1)

Nigger, on that exact flat earth map. If you drew a straight line from Usuaia Argentina to Perth Australia and then drew another line from Ottawa Canada to Beijing China, then compared the two lines. The line from Usuaia to Perth is substantially longer, even though the two cities are 500 miles closer.

Therefore, that model is clearly and obviously flawed.

Now, using your alleged "logic", explain how a longer line equates to a shorter distance.

[ - ] Love240 -2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:27:58 ago (+0/-2)

It never claimed to be to scale accurate. That requires phsyical observations and coalescing of the data, which is how we have the maps and 'models' we have now, which has absolutely zero curvature in it. Only magnetic declination, which work just fine on a flat earth.

Again, you have no logic, which is why you don't understand that both models use the same data.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:34:30 ago (+2/-0)

which is how we have the maps and 'models' we have now,

Great post a model with a scale for distance.

Seems like that would be easy to do if it were true.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:51:12 ago (+0/-1)

It's the same data. That's the model. You don't know the difference because you're a disingenuous nigger™ that is reifying the model and begging the question, oblivious to your own blindspot (of course).

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:54:25 ago (+1/-0)

That model that the OP posted? Where the creator of the model says

The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth.

And

Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.

Which is why there is no scale for distance?

That model? The model where the creator tells you it only works AS A GLOBE?

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:55:40 ago (+0/-1)

That model that the OP posted?

Literally just answered that.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:41:50 ago (+2/-0)

It never claimed to be to scale accurate.

Yes it did, faggot.

Only distances exactly north-south are correct.

Then he also said,

Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:48:52 ago (+0/-1)

Yes it did, faggot.

No, you said it yourself, it was made by a globie. Why would he put the effort in to getting the sizes right? How can it be claimed to have correct distances if he didn't even try adding them?

I don't blame him, that's hard work.

But you're a disingenuous nigger™ that appeals to authority and doesn't know it, because there is no way to verify those distances as a straight line because that's not how airplanes fly their routes, which you also don't understand even though it's been explained to you already.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:56:45 ago (+2/-0)

So, the model is right, but the creator of the model is wrong despite the fact that you can verify the flaw in the model yourself? And, it's exactly the flaw the he describes, and exactly the reason why you will never post a model with a scale for distance.

He said the distances are exactly right north to south, but anything that is not north to south is wrong. Show me where he's wrong.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:06:29 ago (+0/-1)

So, the model is right, but the creator of the model is wrong despite the fact that you can verify the flaw in the model yourself?

Nobody is perfect, save one, Lord Jesus.

And, it's exactly the flaw the he describes, and exactly the reason why you will never post a model with a scale for distance.

Which is why he didn't even try to work on it.

He said the distances are exactly right north to south, but anything that is not north to south is wrong. Show me where he's wrong.

Simple, center (the north) is not a point, but a circle. The missing area there goes a long way toward explaining that.

News flash: for the earth to not be a spinning ball doesn't require me to explain the everything to you in the most minute details.

From this week of schooling you retards it is painfully obvious of how little you actually know.

You and other globies are such insufferable faggots because you think you know everything, but all you do is offload your senses to 'experts' and then you bullheaded claim you that do.

You're the breathing epitome of logical fallacy.
Continue thread

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:11:24 ago (+2/-0)

airplanes fly their routes,

They fly their routes in the shortest distance possible. North to south, they fly in exactly straight lines. Same with East to west unless the curvature of the earth allows for them to fly a wide arc to cheat the distance of the curvature.

The don't fly semi-circles.

[ - ] Love240 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:16:44 ago (+0/-0)

They fly their routes in the shortest distance possible.

Nope, a pilot has to consider flight duration, fuel, maximum takeoff weight, weather conditions, and other miscellaneous factors.

North to south, they fly in exactly straight lines.

Which would not be possible on a globe, the spinning would mean they'd be having to fly sideways. Again, you don't know your own model.
Continue thread

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:21:55 ago (+1/-0)

The creator of the model, who does not think the earth is actually flat, even says it.

Distances: The biggest problem are distances on the flat earth. Only distances exactly north-south are correct. All other distances are wrong, especially south of the equator, eg. Australia is 2.5 times too wide on the flat earth. Only if we deform the flat earth until it is a globe we can get all distances right.

Which is why you faggots won't post a model with a scale. Cause the "distances are wrong, especially south of the equator" and any scale you tried to scam off on us would be blatantly wrong.

[ - ] Love240 -2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:30:25 ago (+0/-2)

the distances are wrong, therefore the physical impossibility of a globe and maintaining a vacuum directly next to a pressurized container is reality.

Nigger, no. Just because there are things that are not known does not mean your fanciful physical impossibilities are somehow the only option. That is delusional.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:38:40 ago (+2/-0)

Nigger, the quote is from the website with the model posted by OP. The creator of that model does not suggest that the earth is flat and states very clearly that none of the distances, except the ones going directly north to south or directly south to north are correct.

He also says that in order to correct the distances that are wrong, the model that he provided would have to be made into a globe.

The distance between Ottawa and Beijing is known. The distance between Usuaia and Perth is known. You can physically draw lines between each of the two cities and compare them. If the line from Usuaia to Perth is longer than the line between Ottawa and Beijing, then the model is wrong.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:51:23 ago (+2/-0)

Just because there are things that are not known does not mean your fanciful physical impossibilities are somehow the only option.

Bullshit, nigger. It's basic geometry.

If you measure the distance between two lines of longitude at a northerly latitude, at the equator, and at the corresponding southerly latitude, and compared the three distances, the is only 1 reasonable shape that would explain how the northerly measurement and the southerly measurement would be equal but both be shorter than at the equator.

A globe is the only reasonable solution.

There is no solution that is flat. None.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:54:49 ago (+0/-1)

Bullshit, nigger. It's basic geometry.

Then do it, show me the proof.

If you measure the distance between two lines of longitude at a northerly latitude, at the equator, and at the corresponding southerly latitude, and compared the three distances, the is only 1 reasonable shape that would explain how the northerly measurement and the southerly measurement would be equal but both be shorter than at the equator.

Then do it. Let's see the proof.

A globe is the only reasonable solution.

A vacuum directly next to a pressurized system is not a reasonable solution.

There is no solution that is flat. None.

Again, you are reifying your model. It is a priori flat.
That's how the equipment for sustained powered flight was engineered in the first place.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:04:28 ago (+2/-0)*

A vacuum directly next to a pressurized system is not a reasonable solution.

1. The earth is not a pressurized system, ya fuckin' retard.

2. This is about basic geometry. The shape of the Earth is not dependent upon pressure. And the characteristics of a sphere are not dependent upon pressure, either.

But, given that you believe the earth is a pressurized system shows that you're dumb as fuck.

The pressure that we feel on the earth is a result of a basic, easily calculated equation.

Pressure = density of the atmosphere (times) gravitational constant (times) height of the substance above you.

Of course, you don't believe in gravity either, right?

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:08:48 ago (+0/-1)

1. The earth is not a pressurized system, ya fuckin' retard.

LOL what is the pressure at 'sea level', then, retard?

2. This is about basic geometry. The shape of the Earth is not dependent upon pressure. And the characteristics of a sphere are not dependent upon pressure, either.

No it's fucking not about 'geometry', this has all been about your misunderstanding of how this world works and the stupid kike lies that you have been convinced of throughout your dumb-ass life.

Muh grabidy!
Continue thread

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:59:28 ago (+1/-0)

I told you how to get the proof. Draw a lines between two points at a northern latitude, and the corresponding southern latitude compare the length. It isn't that hard. In the real world, those distances would be the same so the lines would be the same length. On the flat earth posted, they are not even close to the same length.