Open a book or something. You are arguing things you clearly don't understand. Let's start with basic established mathematics (if that isn't too jewy fake and gay).
Base 10 number system. What is 4 plus 4?
If you can't answer, because you think it is some trick, then you are merely treading water in life. We have to start somewhere.
From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:
And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.
Opening up books is why I'm a flat Earther. Maybe you should lay off the boob tube.
Newton expressed in his letter that he personally found it absurd to apply his theory of gravity to celestial mechanics. He felt that the notion of gravity acting across a vacuum without a physical medium was conceptually troubling and did not want his name associated with such ideas. His skepticism was more than a concern about how others might view the theory; he genuinely struggled with the implications of action at a distance in the context of celestial bodies.
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:19:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 00:00:11 ago (+0/-0)
If space is a vacuum, you aren't going anywhere on spew power with nothing to spew against.
Kind of like how you spew your nonsense. Impotent.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:23:16 ago (+0/-1)
I wonder how that works?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergolic_propellant
An oxidizer? Why would fuel need an oxidizer in a vacuum?
Thanks for playing.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 18:49:51 ago (+0/-0)
Base 10 number system. What is 4 plus 4?
If you can't answer, because you think it is some trick, then you are merely treading water in life. We have to start somewhere.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 19:45:44 ago (+0/-0)
And find something like this?
From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:
Opening up books is why I'm a flat Earther. Maybe you should lay off the boob tube.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 20:57:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 21:05:30 ago (+0/-0)
The comprehending does.
Newton expressed in his letter that he personally found it absurd to apply his theory of gravity to celestial mechanics. He felt that the notion of gravity acting across a vacuum without a physical medium was conceptually troubling and did not want his name associated with such ideas. His skepticism was more than a concern about how others might view the theory; he genuinely struggled with the implications of action at a distance in the context of celestial bodies.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 16:19:59 ago (+1/-1)
The flat earth model you post is demonstrably false.