Sign into an existing account

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:38:48 ago (+1/-3)

You could have me eat a turd right now and never make another post. All you have to do is stop with the dumb jewish bullshit and explain to me why an airplane at 1 mile away would appear the same size if it were 250 mi away. Simple.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:53:43 ago (+2/-1)

implying you will ever stop spamming until you’re banned

Why would anyone here trust you? Kill self.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:55:40 ago (+1/-1)

It's worth a shot right? How hard could it be?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:02:06 ago (+1/-1)

Nah, kill self.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:04:40 ago (+1/-1)

Lol. You make a great argument for the flat Earth. You know that?

[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic

[ - ] Tallest_Skil -1 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 21:49:13 ago (+0/-1)

you disproved my jewish hoax therefore you proved it

Nah, kill self.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 5 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:48:33 ago (+5/-0)

The reason an airplane at one mile away might appear the same size as one at 250 miles away is due to the limitations of human vision, specifically the concept of angular resolution.
Angular resolution refers to the smallest angle between two points that the human eye can distinguish. When an object is very far away, the angle it subtends (the angle it appears to take up in your field of view) becomes very small. For example, an airplane at 1 mile away subtends a larger angle than one at 250 miles away, but both angles are so small that they fall below the threshold of what your eye can distinguish as different sizes. Enjoy your shit sandwich, jew.

[ + ] Moravian

[ - ] Moravian 3 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:35:50 ago (+3/-0)

Exactly. Funny how there's no response.

[ + ] big_fat_dangus

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 2 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 23:05:45 ago (+2/-0)

lol @mcnasty it's time for your shit sandwich

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 23:13:08 ago (+0/-0)

The jew won't eat it. But he will stick his fingers in his butt while he room whacks!

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 3 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:27:14 ago (+3/-0)

It's like crickets in here.

I think the only crickets OP is talking about is inside his vagina.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:29:00 ago (+1/-1)

I'm definitely not eating turds.

[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:55:19 ago (+2/-0)

go to bed.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:57:18 ago (+1/-1)

Lol. You're telling me not one of you nigger kikes want me to stop posting? The challenge. Think of the challenge.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 23:04:46 ago (+1/-0)

Shalom.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 1 point 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:45:50 ago (+3/-2)*

I want to know how 50,000 satellites are orbiting earth with no fuel and not fucking up. Also, all fuckload of them are not crashing into each other or getting fucked up by space trash/debris. And why don’t they need fuel to maintain orbit and to maintain 17500 MPH? Why? Because space is bullshit.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:54:17 ago (+2/-0)

newton’s laws are too hard for me!

Come on, man.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 20:26:41 ago (+2/-1)

From Isaac Newton for Mr. Bentley at the palace in worchester:

And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Isaac Newton would have called Albert Einstein a retard.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 21:59:29 ago (+1/-0)

So yes, newton’s laws are too hard for you. Got it.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 08:28:41 ago (+0/-0)

So yes, newton’s laws are too hard for you. Got it.

I'm sure anybody reading these comments would come to the same conclusion. You make a great argument for flat Earth.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 09:50:36 ago (+0/-0)

Don’t worry, you’ll kill yourself soon.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 19:49:53 ago (+1/-2)

This is the subject to talk about if you want to know who is a kike. Kikes never answer these questions.

[ - ] ruck_feddit 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 03:10:47 ago (+0/-0)

See how the moon looks bigger in the pic on the right? It's from the zoom. The ISS appears "smaller" than the 747 even with the extra zoom. That's because it's farther away from you than the airplane.

The ISS might be fake and gay, but your pic just proves it looks much smaller than a 747 even while using a better telescope.

You pulled a great self own.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 25, 2024 08:17:31 ago (+0/-0)

See how the moon looks bigger in the pic on the right?

Lol. The moon is irrelevant, you should not see the ISS at all. Are talking about something that is 250* further away.

[ - ] ruck_feddit 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 20:39:20 ago (+0/-0)

Wait, you can't see the ISS swing in front of a full moon? You're being this retarded just because you need glasses?

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 21:16:38 ago (+0/-0)

Wait, you can't see the ISS swing in front of a full moon?

Saying that I "should not" is not the same thing as thing I "don't."

The way angular size works, an object gets further away. It will appear smaller. 250 mi is too far away to see a Boeing 747 at all.

If you scale down the example, do you think you could see a penny from 1 mile away?

[ - ] ruck_feddit 1 point 9 monthsJul 27, 2024 14:38:46 ago (+1/-0)

Lol. The moon is irrelevant, you should not see the ISS at all. Are talking about something that is 250* further away.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 27, 2024 14:43:44 ago (+0/-0)

Correct. So if we do see the ISS, it would suggest that it is not 250 mi away in outer space.

[ - ] ruck_feddit 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2024 15:08:23 ago (+0/-0)

But we can't see it with the naked eye, because it's too far away. Your picture was taken through a telescope with proper zoom.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2024 16:30:59 ago (+0/-0)*

No.

The easiest way to find out what the heliocentric claim is, is the Google it.

Yes, you can see the International Space Station (ISS) with the naked eye. It's usually the second brightest object in the sky after the moon, and can be seen from cities and rural areas alike. The ISS appears as a bright white dot that moves quickly across the sky without changing direction, similar to a fast-moving plane but much higher and faster.

The rule is that you have to stick to heliocentric claims.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2024 16:34:24 ago (+0/-0)

No.

The easiest way to find out what the heliocentric claim is, is the Google it.

[ - ] ruck_feddit 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2024 16:58:34 ago (+0/-0)

Your argument is unclear.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2024 18:22:18 ago (+0/-0)

If you want to know what the heliocentric mainstream NASA claim is, Just Google it.

You're telling me that it's not possible to see the ISS with the naked eye.

Just Google "is it possible to see the ISS with the naked eye?"

The answer is yes. Neither globe Earth or flat Earth is claiming that we cannot see the ISS. What's in question is whether we should be able to see it.

Continue thread

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic -1 points 9 monthsJul 24, 2024 23:15:03 ago (+0/-1)

Do you twirl your fecal finger around owen benjewin's nipple hair after the room whack?