[ - ] Theo 2 points 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 13:39:16 ago (+2/-0)
The sun never sets on a flat earth. The usual response is 'perspective!', but that doesn't work because if perspective were relevant the sun would appear to get smaller as it moved futher away.
This picture is taken from the shoreline of lake Michigan 60 mi away. This would be impossible on a round Earth. As for a flat Earth, it is rare to be able to see the entire city of Chicago given the amount of moisture that would normally be in the air over lake Michigan. The picture above would be one of those rare occasions where there is low moisture in the air. The following picture would be from the same perspective, but taken on a day with more humidity in the air.
Notice how the bottom half of the city is now obstructed by The horizon. This is because atmospheric refraction makes the horizon apparent.
So, it is impossible to see beyond the physical horizon on a round earth, but globohomos claim that refraction somehow magically makes the round Earth appear flat. But those idiots don't understand how refraction works.
When you stick a pencil in a glass of water, it might appear broken. This is not the case. What is happening is that the light that is transmitting from the pencil to your eyeballs is traveling through a denser medium than air. When it travels through that medium, the light particles will disperse away from each other and spread. This creates a magnifying effect. If you sharpen that pencil and stuck the pencil in the glass with the sharpened point down, you will notice that you cannot see the sharpened point any longer. This is because the glass is your lens. If you magnify the image inside that lens, then the lens will be too small to hold the entire image. Therefore, any objects that you are magnifying with that lens will be cut off on the edges. The horizon is the edge of our lens, therefore, The more moisture that is between the object emitting light and the observer, The more of a magnification effect will occur. If the horizon is the bottom of our lens, then the more magnification we see, The more objects will be cut off from the bottom up.
It's really simple. Refraction proves 100% that the world is flat. This does not work on a round earth. You can only invoke some jewish theoretical metaphysics that cannot be reproduced as your proof.
This is the really messed up part about it. Because radio waves and lasers work with a line of sight. So you dumb faggots claim that we can see further than possible on a spherical Earth because refraction can magically create the illusion of flat, also saying that the ionosphere is reflecting radio waves in the such a perfect way that you can aim your laser as if the world is flat. Everything with you faggots is, "it's a globe, if you want anything to work though you have to treat it like it's flat."
Refraction is not light curvature. Light particles are traveling through a dense medium. Since the medium is denser than air, the particles have less room to travel unobstructed. They will inevitably bump into the particles that make up the denser medium and separate. They are not curving anywhere. They are simply separating. Like dropping a handful of marbles into a pool of water versus dropping a handful of marbles into an empty pool. The pool that has water will show a wider impact zone where the marbles meet the bottom of the pool. This is exactly how refraction works. For some reason, you were dumb enough to think refraction is the bending of light.
But yes, refraction does explain why the sun appears to set. As the sun travels further away, there will inevitably be more moisture between the Sun and the observer creating a magnification effect that increases as the distance increases. At the same time, The sun is traveling away from the observer creating a degradation in angular resolution. This means that the sun is appearing smaller based on perspective while at the same time being enlarged through refraction. This will give the illusion that the sun is remaining at the same size as it travels away. As it gets so far away, our horizon acts as the edge of a magnifying lens. Just like a simple magnifying glass that you can hold in your hand above a sheet of paper on the table, you Will notice that as you pull the magnifying glass from the sheet of paper, The image on the paper is enlarged through the lens but the lens can only hold so much of the image. This means that there will be part of the image cut out of view. This is a repeatable phenomenon. Keyword is repeatable. Something globohomos can't do.
No. That's not how it works at all. You can't bend a light particle. You can only deflect them. If you were to deflect it several times, it might appear as though its trajectory is bending, but like my example of marbles in a pool of water, you are not bending the marbles. The marbles are just passing through space that is more densely packed with particles than air has.
We can talk about semantics. Whether the light is bending or deflecting. Regardless of what word you want to use to describe a light particles movement during refraction, it is always going to give the result of magnification.
Let's ask Google if a magnifying glass is refracting light.
Here's an article written for little kids so that they can understand that magnification is an effect from refraction.
[ - ] Theo 1 point 11 monthsJul 13, 2024 13:09:57 ago (+1/-0)
You can't bend a light particle, but a massive object can warp space so that light travels in a curved path rather than a straight line. Astronomers observe this as gravitational lensing.
but a massive object can warp space so that light travels in a curved path
No. This is jewish metaphysics and pseudoscience.
If what you are saying is correct then we should be able to observe the results. Instead, we infer that dark matter exists because if it didn't nothing would work like you are claiming it works. We have never observed dark matter. This is the most jewish thing there is.
"Trust us goy, if dark matter didn't exist, why would we tell you it exists?"
That could have been an honest mistake. Maybe you didn't know Einstein was a jew.
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 2 points 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 13:39:16 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 15:01:47 ago (+1/-1)
Here is an example.
https://files.catbox.moe/o3hnot.jpg
This picture is taken from the shoreline of lake Michigan 60 mi away. This would be impossible on a round Earth. As for a flat Earth, it is rare to be able to see the entire city of Chicago given the amount of moisture that would normally be in the air over lake Michigan. The picture above would be one of those rare occasions where there is low moisture in the air. The following picture would be from the same perspective, but taken on a day with more humidity in the air.
https://files.catbox.moe/4nsuvh.jpeg
Notice how the bottom half of the city is now obstructed by The horizon. This is because atmospheric refraction makes the horizon apparent.
So, it is impossible to see beyond the physical horizon on a round earth, but globohomos claim that refraction somehow magically makes the round Earth appear flat. But those idiots don't understand how refraction works.
When you stick a pencil in a glass of water, it might appear broken. This is not the case. What is happening is that the light that is transmitting from the pencil to your eyeballs is traveling through a denser medium than air. When it travels through that medium, the light particles will disperse away from each other and spread. This creates a magnifying effect. If you sharpen that pencil and stuck the pencil in the glass with the sharpened point down, you will notice that you cannot see the sharpened point any longer. This is because the glass is your lens. If you magnify the image inside that lens, then the lens will be too small to hold the entire image. Therefore, any objects that you are magnifying with that lens will be cut off on the edges. The horizon is the edge of our lens, therefore, The more moisture that is between the object emitting light and the observer, The more of a magnification effect will occur. If the horizon is the bottom of our lens, then the more magnification we see, The more objects will be cut off from the bottom up.
It's really simple. Refraction proves 100% that the world is flat. This does not work on a round earth. You can only invoke some jewish theoretical metaphysics that cannot be reproduced as your proof.
This is the really messed up part about it. Because radio waves and lasers work with a line of sight. So you dumb faggots claim that we can see further than possible on a spherical Earth because refraction can magically create the illusion of flat, also saying that the ionosphere is reflecting radio waves in the such a perfect way that you can aim your laser as if the world is flat. Everything with you faggots is, "it's a globe, if you want anything to work though you have to treat it like it's flat."
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 1 point 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 19:13:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 20:29:38 ago (+0/-1)*
Refraction is not light curvature. Light particles are traveling through a dense medium. Since the medium is denser than air, the particles have less room to travel unobstructed. They will inevitably bump into the particles that make up the denser medium and separate. They are not curving anywhere. They are simply separating. Like dropping a handful of marbles into a pool of water versus dropping a handful of marbles into an empty pool. The pool that has water will show a wider impact zone where the marbles meet the bottom of the pool. This is exactly how refraction works. For some reason, you were dumb enough to think refraction is the bending of light.
But yes, refraction does explain why the sun appears to set. As the sun travels further away, there will inevitably be more moisture between the Sun and the observer creating a magnification effect that increases as the distance increases. At the same time, The sun is traveling away from the observer creating a degradation in angular resolution. This means that the sun is appearing smaller based on perspective while at the same time being enlarged through refraction. This will give the illusion that the sun is remaining at the same size as it travels away. As it gets so far away, our horizon acts as the edge of a magnifying lens. Just like a simple magnifying glass that you can hold in your hand above a sheet of paper on the table, you Will notice that as you pull the magnifying glass from the sheet of paper, The image on the paper is enlarged through the lens but the lens can only hold so much of the image. This means that there will be part of the image cut out of view. This is a repeatable phenomenon. Keyword is repeatable. Something globohomos can't do.
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 1 point 11 monthsJul 13, 2024 02:01:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 13, 2024 10:26:20 ago (+0/-1)
We can talk about semantics. Whether the light is bending or deflecting. Regardless of what word you want to use to describe a light particles movement during refraction, it is always going to give the result of magnification.
Let's ask Google if a magnifying glass is refracting light.
Here's an article written for little kids so that they can understand that magnification is an effect from refraction.
https://www.amnh.org/explore/ology/physics/see-the-light2/refraction#:~:text=Magnifying%20lenses%20also%20use%20refraction,so%20the%20image%20appears%20larger.
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 1 point 11 monthsJul 13, 2024 13:09:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 11 monthsJul 14, 2024 09:27:27 ago (+0/-1)
No. This is jewish metaphysics and pseudoscience.
If what you are saying is correct then we should be able to observe the results. Instead, we infer that dark matter exists because if it didn't nothing would work like you are claiming it works. We have never observed dark matter. This is the most jewish thing there is.
"Trust us goy, if dark matter didn't exist, why would we tell you it exists?"
That could have been an honest mistake. Maybe you didn't know Einstein was a jew.
[ + ] Theo
[ - ] Theo 0 points 11 monthsJul 16, 2024 19:39:48 ago (+0/-0)
Fuck off you ignorant plonker.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 08:04:48 ago (+3/-1)
As for your flat earth bullshit,
Take the Challenge
https://youtu.be/AQl8h7Aa75s?si=D-hlPr35jSf3-BZF
Does this sound like you?
https://youtu.be/KyD8VIK032o?si=etfwGQb9lobucnWx
Do you hear this much? What's your response?
https://youtu.be/JDy95_eNPzM?si=qMoWx2MoKlvJJQwx
What about the moon?
https://youtu.be/_bHqBy92iGM?si=upwS_9ubiwd4QFBA
And the stars?
https://youtu.be/su-fmoZUkF8?si=yHCKgpomS_k7n6kU
Why wouldn't planes just fly in a straight line?
https://youtu.be/Dd-FAyHdpxI?si=3AfNThmPfuePIRZ-
Show me your model of Flat earth with a scale for distance.
Show me a side of the moon that I don't see right here in Austin Texas, every full moon.
Show me a building that should be over the horizon but that you can still see over a spance of land instead of water.
Show me a picture of Chicago that YOU took from the shores of MI.
Show me a model that explains why the southern tip of south America experiences long days in the winter and short days in the summer.
Tell me why the constellations rotate one way in the northern hemisphere but the opposite way in the southern hemisphere.
Explain how a lunar eclipse works on your dumb assed fuckin' model.
You can't. Because the earth is a fucking globe, ya disingenuous fucking nigger.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 15:09:35 ago (+1/-0)
Gotta love how the 'accelerations and decelerations' of the moon are so debunked by the flat earth explanation for the moon he presents...
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 11 monthsJul 12, 2024 09:42:11 ago (+2/-1)
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-01/who-got-america-to-the-moon-a-unlikely-collaboration-of-jews-and-former-nazi-engineers