×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
46

Low end of the cognitive spectrum

submitted by UncleDoug to Niggers 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 03:43:41 ago (+46/-0)     (pomf2.lain.la)

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/20uwp6n.mp4

What it Means to have an IQ LOWER than 83 | Jordan Peterstein


41 comments block


[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 06:22:17 ago (+1/-0)

Plenty of jobs here for them here in NYC. I have worked around my fair share of 80's and 90's.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:29:28 ago (+2/-1)

Nyc sucks

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:17:23 ago (+0/-1)

Nyc is just not wjere tonlive these days

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:23:12 ago (+1/-0)

Yoooooooo! mah nigga? dey gat jawbz fo muh dyyyyyck? ya herrrd?!

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 10:40:08 ago (+0/-0)

How do you stand living in that shithole? Good lord, jew yawk city is the armpit of America

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:40:37 ago (+0/-0)

No, it's the shitty, un-wiped asshole of America.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:23:41 ago (+1/-0)

Nobody followed this up during any of the interviews I've seen. I bet that is part of the agreement to get an interview with Peterstein because most of his other views don't hold once you start analyzing dysgenics.

[ - ] hylo 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 09:21:08 ago (+1/-0)

I remwmber listening to this bit from JP a while ago. Watching it again now I can say that half the stuff he says is pure speculation. It sounds logical, sure, but it's not based on facts, reality or something that was researched.

In most likelyhood, the reason why the military doesn't take people with below 83 IQ, is they are not as efficient to train and there is plenty of better stock available.


I am sure you can give a gun to anyone that can hold it and run towards the enemy. They will at least be an expendable target.

[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 14:50:33 ago (+2/-0)

I am sure you can give a gun to anyone that can hold it and run towards the enemy. They will at least be an expendable target.

Friendly fire is a thing.

[ - ] observation1 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 13:26:46 ago (+1/-0)

How is that different than what he said

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 09:23:51 ago (+0/-0)

They will at least be an expendable target.

How is that marketable and most of all profitable, to train and equip lemmings?

[ - ] hylo 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 15:44:51 ago (+0/-0)

Marketable? Unless the US military is into selling soldiers that term doesn't apply. Anyway, for the cost of a rifle and some old equipment that is gathering dust, you can send a valid target and force the enemy to use their potentially expensive arsenal against your cheap, disposable soldier. That's what Russia is doing with convicts and people from the provinces they don't like. They don't train them, they just give them a rusty AK and tell them to charge or they get shot. The Ukrainians reveal their positions, their strength and then Russia sends artillery. Rinse and repeat. That's how they've been gaining ground.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:59:13 ago (+1/-0)

And this is after the shitskins get bonus points on IQ tests simply for not being White, and they still get test scores of retarded.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 2 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 03:44:48 ago (+3/-1)

Huh?!

[ - ] GreatSatan 7 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 03:55:32 ago (+7/-0)

You are what the video is talking about

[ - ] DukeofRaul 6 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 03:56:47 ago (+6/-0)

Wash your penis

[ - ] Prairie 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 06:58:28 ago (+1/-0)

Before or after cleaning one's room?

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:08:14 ago (+0/-1)

You are witnessing the greatest animal show on earth

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:08:46 ago (+0/-1)

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:17:47 ago (+0/-1)

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:18:16 ago (+0/-1)

[ - ] DukeofRaul -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:30:40 ago (+0/-1)

People in nyc pay me to soend a weekend at my farm

[ - ] Clubberlang -1 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:21:18 ago (+0/-1)

Wuuuuuuuut? Aye doen legit even noe wuuuuut heez tawkink aboud ever.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:32:49 ago (+0/-0)

Huh?!

[ - ] ModernGuilt 2 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:33:34 ago (+2/-0)

I remember this interview. The interviewers comments are cut out because he kept coping like a retard himself saying, 'ya they are too dumb to train, but can't you just train them more?'

[ - ] Leveraction 3 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 10:36:57 ago (+3/-0)

Easy. EVERY dumbocrap and nigger has an iq of less than 83.

[ - ] NeverHappened 3 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:14:43 ago (+3/-0)

Mentally retarded is 85. They had to change it to 69 because almost all niggers are retarded.
A White with an IQ of 85 clearly has something wrong with them but it's just normal for nogs.
Peterson is at best a limited hangout with a whore daughter.

[ - ] RabbiKinderschtupper 9 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 06:45:30 ago (+9/-0)

I work in IT for a government entity. Plenty of below 90's that I have to babysit every day. So many people who are incapable of any job other than keeping a chair warm.

[ - ] deleted 4 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:27:37 ago (+4/-0)

deleted

[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:55:04 ago (+0/-0)

I work under a White woman (though I'm paid more, which she's thrilled about), and I frequently... like probably quarterly... have to explain percentages and averages to her. Charts and data visualizations are right out, which is unfortunate because I have to give presentations that she must approve (retarded, I know, but that's government). She favors a literal cartoon over a time series or bar graph. I wish I was being hyperbolic.

[ - ] SmallGuyFromBrooklyn 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 19:23:23 ago (+0/-0)

Women were introduced into the workplace for multiple reasons. First they were used to hide the federal reserve robbing the goy by introducing more workers. It's not the jews robbing you, it's these females! Pay no attention to the big nose behind the iron curtain, that's just anti semitic ... And sure, idiots will say it was the boomers, NAFTA, outsourcing. Regardless, that purchasing power would erode over time. By design too. Hypothetically, assuming women never entered the workforce, it would be some other group: niggers, mexicans, somalis. And we see that today, one group gets emplaced into a position of power, than curb stomped back to the dumps. See Rwanda for the playbook. And the worst part is White people who literally had no say in this are being blamed for the actions of decrepit jews. Sadly, there is limited groups one can use for this playbook which is why we see the construction of more shoehorned, specific groups: LGBT, LGBTQIA, QIA+.

Second, they introduce a divide/conquer issue through blatant lawfare and legal favoritism. Because simps will always seek validation from their peers, as an aggregate, it tends to force the men to curtail asinine, absurd requests from completely incredulous mental retards. I've heard some absolutely retarded, mentally mind boggling dumb shit from women. The reason why is simple when you think about biology. Without fail, those ideas explode in their faces, and it's not women fixing shit. It's the men who have to go in, fix everything, and untangle the mess that was created. When the ramifications of illegal replacement migration, something liberal women overwhelmingly voted for come to fruit, who do you think will be fixing that crap? Not women, they'll happily dump the responsibility on someone else.

Guess who will take the credit for it though? Women of course. Old cultures knew the dangers of letting women in positions of power. They also didn't give an iota of a crap if some random one off woman was doing some research. This is why Marie Curie could do research and no one cared. Left in a cubicle hole, to their own devices to do some busy work, no one really cares about women. And sure 1 in maybe 100,000 wont act like a complete and utter mentally challenged moron. But given a hint of power, women will destroy a culture worst than any nuclear bomb could.

[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 11 monthsJun 12, 2024 08:10:15 ago (+0/-0)

Old cultures knew the dangers of letting women in positions of power

Well, the ones that survived anyway. Even viewing today's successful societies through a Darwinist lens should tell you something about how successful matriarchal and persistent societies are.

I kinda get the feeling it's like that "do what you will; I've already won" meme. You walk in to find the society in ruins and a woman in the corner drunk with power, and her only thought is "doesn't matter; got girl power."

[ - ] TheNoticing 2 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:38:08 ago (+2/-0)

Let me guess, they'e niggers, spics, and pajeets, with the odd lowercase white person thrown in.

[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 10:38:43 ago (+1/-0)

Let me guess. Those "chair warmers" all have shit for skins. That is of course HOW they got their jobs. No IQ required.

[ - ] RabbiKinderschtupper 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 13:17:48 ago (+1/-0)

Most of them, yes, but there are also some embarrassingly stupid White people here.

[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 07:29:01 ago (+0/-0)

Is this mount weather or something?

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:20:15 ago (+0/-0)

Gotta love the DEI hires

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 12 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 05:38:22 ago (+12/-0)

Not a fan of Jewdon but I'm still trying to imagine being too stupid for the military.

[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 6 points 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 08:28:35 ago (+6/-0)

Juden is hamstrung by the same thing that seems to affect all modern day prophets: love of the shekel. His cash flow is jew dominated. Just like Congress. Just like even the most conservative pundits. Which allows them to be right within strict (((limits))). So if it doesn't directly pertain to the JQ, most of the time they have accurate things to say, presented in a cogent manner.

And I'm even doing them a bit of a disservice by pointing to the love of the shekel - they're fully in bed to the point that they'll be destroyed if they speak out. So they not only lose their money and means to support themselves (or at least, support that lifestyle), but they lose any platform with the ability to expound upon whatever got them censored in the first place. Candace Owens is going through this right now.

Can you imagine going to any investor with pitch of founding a media company that won't shy away from exposing or blaming the jews for thing they're directly responsible for? Never happen in today's world.

[ - ] TheNoticing 1 point 11 monthsJun 11, 2024 11:31:50 ago (+1/-0)

Probably had more leeway a few years ago right when he blew up online.