Jews are a substandard race of humans. Not sure where they came from but there is only one FINAL SOLUTION to the JEWISH PROBLEM. In 100 years there will one of two outcomes.
1) Jews will run a planet of niggers and gooks. 2) There will be no jews left.
The question wasn't whether we should outlaw all religion, the question was whether we should outlaw jewish religion. Have you forgotten that your ancestors had religions before jews came?
You can give a good instruction to an evil person and they will do evil with it. You can give an evil instruction to a good person and they will do good with it.
The instructions aren't going to be the thing to make a difference, it will be the heart of the perceiver.
Words are nothing in themselves. It is the corrupt heart that can make words an issue. Like alcohol to an alcoholic, perhaps a case could be made for evil words not being given to evil hearts.
The words of the Talmud contain evil. Should then Talmudism be banned? No. That only drives evil people to find clever ways to hide themselves, in the same way that alcoholics will find a way to find a drink.
It is better to fight evil with good rather than evil with evil, lest we bring injury to redeemable Talmudites that would find a way to do good from evil instruction. These souls can be redeemed and saved, just as much as an alcoholic can be saved. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. It is better just to focus on stating what Talmudic philosophy says and rebuke people for following evil instruction for the purpose of committing evil. Treat them like alcoholics. Some alcoholics find help, others never do and will give in to their vices. The ones that successfully find help are those that find successful measures for mitigating the nature of their vices.
An alcoholic that successfully resolves to never touch liquor never stops being an alcoholic, they are always a recovering alcoholic (with effort). An evil/corrupt person that repents of their ways never stops being evil/corrupt, they are always in a state of recovering (with effort).
The words of the Talmud say, specifically, that goys are nothing but cattle and serve to enrich the jew. And that kikes can rape a 3 year old, if a non-kike.
Yes, ALL jewish religions should be outlawed, even their golems like satanism, christianity, new age, and islam. Only ancestral Paganism should be allowed and encouraged.
They should, and I’m speaking literally, be all killed as slowly with as much torture as one could handle. The executioner, not the subhuman.
All of them. Every single one. Not one is “good”. Not one is worthy. We all are at risk until that infection is completely destroyed.
Then we send a message to the shitskins and pajeets to stay where they are, else the same happen. They expand, they die. We hunt the niggers and spics for fun, like the guys shooting fish from the boat.
Non-belief, meaning an overall mental rejection of God. The default state of infants is ambivalence, which is a mixed belief based on a proposition.
The religion that often calls itself atheism poses metaphysical naturalism which itself is not based in science.
If you want to play word games, technically theism isn't a belief system either. It is a description of a mental state. Both terms reference categories of belief systems. Both atheism and theism refer to a mental state that would necessitate an underlying belief system. The terms are sometimes used colloquially to refer those underlying belief systems but themselves truly only describe an overall mental attitude toward the topic of God/gods.
Every human on earth is born atheist until indoctrinated.
And here is the crux of where you are wrong. You are proposing a theory of mind that isn't consistent with modern science. Cognitive Tabula Rasa (unbelief as a default) is not supported by science but yet the (scientific) metacognitive model of ambivalence holds the default state as belief. You can choose to follow your belief system that endorses Tabula Rasa, or you can side with modern cognitive science.
If you want to propose a theory of mind, you'll have to prove it or at least convince your opponents of it.
The possibility remains that they could exist in the form of demons posing as gods. Therefore I am ambivalent toward the propositions (carrying mixed belief).
Ultimately God is the perfect form of consciousness, if you are claiming that FSM fits that profile you are essentially arguing that "God exists" AND "here are the aesthetics that God presents with". FSM is a Poe's Law position, but if you had a genuinely believer, the argument then comes down to both Christian and FSMer would believe the proposition that God exists, the argument would just be over the aesthetics.
And if God rides in the clouds, and if spaghetti is a type of bread (cf. Bread of Life), and Revelation's account of Christ slaying the remnant is considered monstrous, we could see how even with those belief systems there could be overlap with types of aesthetics.
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 4 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 11:52:12 ago (+4/-0)
1) Jews will run a planet of niggers and gooks.
2) There will be no jews left.
A white man needs to make a decision and soon.
[ + ] Jimmycrackerson
[ - ] Jimmycrackerson 4 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 08:25:02 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 10:35:41 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 2 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:28:30 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 2 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 11:20:55 ago (+3/-1)*
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140117153635.htm
Even if you killed every religious person it would evolve again.
There will always be evil in the world, even if you were the world leader/tyrant.
Without religion you get moral relativism.
Some groups are incompatible with Western society and should be excluded
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:29:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:53:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rob3122
[ - ] Rob3122 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 16:21:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 19:01:44 ago (+0/-0)
If you need the fear of a god to do good then you are a psychopath.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:23:07 ago (+1/-0)
We must exterminate the jews not just their religion.
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 1 point 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 10:25:28 ago (+2/-1)
The instructions aren't going to be the thing to make a difference, it will be the heart of the perceiver.
Words are nothing in themselves. It is the corrupt heart that can make words an issue. Like alcohol to an alcoholic, perhaps a case could be made for evil words not being given to evil hearts.
The words of the Talmud contain evil. Should then Talmudism be banned? No. That only drives evil people to find clever ways to hide themselves, in the same way that alcoholics will find a way to find a drink.
It is better to fight evil with good rather than evil with evil, lest we bring injury to redeemable Talmudites that would find a way to do good from evil instruction. These souls can be redeemed and saved, just as much as an alcoholic can be saved. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. It is better just to focus on stating what Talmudic philosophy says and rebuke people for following evil instruction for the purpose of committing evil. Treat them like alcoholics. Some alcoholics find help, others never do and will give in to their vices. The ones that successfully find help are those that find successful measures for mitigating the nature of their vices.
An alcoholic that successfully resolves to never touch liquor never stops being an alcoholic, they are always a recovering alcoholic (with effort). An evil/corrupt person that repents of their ways never stops being evil/corrupt, they are always in a state of recovering (with effort).
[ + ] recon_johnny
[ - ] recon_johnny 3 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 12:30:55 ago (+3/-0)
There’s no way to interpret that to good.
So, respectfully, fuck off with that bullshit.
They all die. It’s the only way.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:52:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 14:39:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 13:08:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] recon_johnny
[ - ] recon_johnny 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 12:27:07 ago (+1/-1)
All of them. Every single one. Not one is “good”. Not one is worthy. We all are at risk until that infection is completely destroyed.
Then we send a message to the shitskins and pajeets to stay where they are, else the same happen. They expand, they die. We hunt the niggers and spics for fun, like the guys shooting fish from the boat.
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 11:08:43 ago (+2/-2)
Live in reality please.
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 17:37:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 18:05:42 ago (+0/-0)
Atheism only means non belief in a deity, that's it.
Every human on earth is born atheist until indoctrinated.
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 00:28:12 ago (+0/-0)
The religion that often calls itself atheism poses metaphysical naturalism which itself is not based in science.
If you want to play word games, technically theism isn't a belief system either. It is a description of a mental state. Both terms reference categories of belief systems. Both atheism and theism refer to a mental state that would necessitate an underlying belief system. The terms are sometimes used colloquially to refer those underlying belief systems but themselves truly only describe an overall mental attitude toward the topic of God/gods.
And here is the crux of where you are wrong. You are proposing a theory of mind that isn't consistent with modern science. Cognitive Tabula Rasa (unbelief as a default) is not supported by science but yet the (scientific) metacognitive model of ambivalence holds the default state as belief. You can choose to follow your belief system that endorses Tabula Rasa, or you can side with modern cognitive science.
If you want to propose a theory of mind, you'll have to prove it or at least convince your opponents of it.
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 01:10:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 07:40:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 11:53:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] The_Reunto
[ - ] The_Reunto 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 15:29:31 ago (+0/-0)
And if God rides in the clouds, and if spaghetti is a type of bread (cf. Bread of Life), and Revelation's account of Christ slaying the remnant is considered monstrous, we could see how even with those belief systems there could be overlap with types of aesthetics.
[ + ] GodDoesNotExist
[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 3 weeksMay 26, 2024 19:14:52 ago (+0/-0)
Holy shit
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 10:54:13 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 15:55:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GreatSatan
[ - ] GreatSatan 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 07:55:25 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser -2 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 11:05:40 ago (+1/-3)
No religion should be outlawed.
They should all be abolished by the people, with extreme prejudice.
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 3 weeksMay 25, 2024 13:22:09 ago (+0/-0)