Well lets play devils advocate here, how about (atlesst for now) we let all the drawn shit alone and take care of, oh I dunno the brow hordes coming over the border where incestious childfucking is common? Or all those fucking trannie freaks? Or even better those who brainwash and cut up children.
Then we can move to the 2nd tire of niggers pimping (underaged girls) and the moms and soydads who tranny up the children/ fuckers trying to groom kids.
After all that if child abuse is still an issue we take on the AI/drawing crowd, but first things first. Yet non of this will happen, too many powerfull interests in keeping IRL children avilable.
So we keep hunting 18yo who slept with an 17 yo classmate.
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 2 points 1 yearMay 21, 2024 08:40:46 ago (+2/-0)
Then we can move to the 2nd tire of niggers pimping (underaged girls) and the moms and soydads who tranny up the children/ fuckers trying to groom kids.
After all that if child abuse is still an issue we take on the AI/drawing crowd, but first things first. Yet non of this will happen, too many powerfull interests in keeping IRL children avilable.
So we keep hunting 18yo who slept with an 17 yo classmate.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 1 yearMay 21, 2024 10:19:48 ago (+1/-0)
If the idiot hadn't sent the pics to a minor, then there would be a good chance of the AI porn law being challenged under the First Amendment.
But wrapping the two charges together makes it a lot harder, and probably way more expensive, to fight both.
Child exploitation laws exist to protect the victim. Who is the victim in AI art? A computer? Someone that "looks" like the person?
Don't we all have doppelgangers? How can everybody on the planet be protected from AI generated images that look like us?
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark 0 points 1 yearMay 21, 2024 04:23:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BrokenVoat
[ - ] BrokenVoat 0 points 1 yearMay 21, 2024 06:47:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 1 yearMay 21, 2024 11:15:53 ago (+0/-0)